See Leong Kit /

( Writer’s letter to TODAY Voices was rejected for publication )

The letter “Clearing the air on pensions” ( TODAY May 14) from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) is just a first step on transparency and accountability expected by our taxpayers and voters.

Thinking Singaporeans do not expect our politicians and senior bureaucrats to live on “fresh air and love of the people”.  They will readily support reasonable and adequate remunerations for such public servants.

However, since 1994, there has been never-ending public consternation over  the million-dollar remunerations of our political office holders.

As such remunerations are paid out of public funds, our taxpayers certainly have the right to know the true facts.  Lack of transparency on this rightful public concern will only aggravate the voter disenchantment that is so evident in the recent general elections.

In the private sector, to promote good corporate governance, the Singapore Stock Exchange requires public-listed companies to disclose the Total Annual Pay packages within salary bands for their CEOs and other senior staff.

Our public sector should also follow suit as an act of good political governance.

For 2010, the reported Total Annual Pay packages of the CEOs of Temasek-linked companies such as DBS, CapitaLand, Semcorp Marine and Keppel Corp ranged from $6.7m to $11.5m.

In 2007, CapitaLand CEO Liew Mun Leong, a former civil servant, received a whopping Total Annual Pay of $20.5m, which led to a public outcry.

For our political office holders, their disclosed Basic Annual Pay are currently $2m for Minister, $3m for Deputy Prime Minister and $3.4m each for the former Minister Mentor and the Senior Minister.  The PM himself receives S$3.76m*. However, their undisclosed Total Annual Pay packages which allegedly comprise such items as basic pay, mid-year bonus, year-end bonus, GDP bonus, Performance bonus have been an endless source of speculation on the Internet.

Taking the cue from the CEO pay packages of Temasek-linked companies, some netizens  deduced that  the Total Annual Pay packages of Temasek Holdings CEO Ho Ching and our Cabinet ministers would likely be in the two-digit millions and upwards of $15m.  But this could mean anything between $15m and $99m.

Thus, the onus is now on the PMO to issue a credible public statement to dispel once and for all the widespread Internet rumours and misinformation surrounding ministers’ Pay.  Additionally, will the postponed third round of their salary increases proceed as planned or be permanently scrapped?

 

* 3:17pm: Earlier today the sentence read “The PM himself receives S$3.4m.” We have just corrected the error, as the PM actually receives S$3.76m.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Indian media defending LVB shareholders over DBS-LVB merger

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which is India’s central bank, has…

旧机场路小贩申诉 社企接管后洗碗碟费涨40巴仙

位于旧机场路小贩中心,数名小贩申诉,自职总富食客接管以来,小贩们的碗碟清理费就增长了40巴仙,达到每月580元。 目前,全国114座小贩中心,其中13座由五大社会企业管理:肥雄、职总富食客、Timbre集团、Hawker Management和OTMH。 其中,职总富食客就从环境局手上接管了五座小贩中心,旧机场路小贩中心就是其中之一。 上月,本社报导也是由职总富食客管理的巴西立中路小贩中心,近10名小贩因为客流量不足、不堪负荷近两千元的附加费用,选择退出。 其中一名经营清真汉堡摊位的小贩贾哈鲁丁也反映,他向职总富食客反映了几次,摊位的排气罩有漏气问题,但是至今都没有解决。 许多小贩反对社企管理手法 许多小贩在社企接管后,面对许多原本在环境局管理下不会面对的问题,渐渐对社企管理模式感到不满。 其中一些社企设下的规定,就包括要向管理层请假修业;不能自行调整十五价格,以及终止租约还要赔“违约金”。 成功跻身新加坡米其林必比登美食指南的鱼缘美食摊主黄正勇,就直言有些小贩中心被当成私人食阁来经营,租金起了、提早退出又拿不回押金,难怪小贩会不满。 在牛车水大厦美食中心经营精致啤酒的Daniel Goh,提到他和一些有抱负的餐饮业者交谈,原本这些人有意当小贩,但发现一个月薪超过2千元的酒店厨师赚得可能必小贩还多,就打消了念头。小贩有很大部分利润都被社企征收的种种高昂费用削掉了。…

Netizens wonder if Dover forest redevelopment plan is a sign that gov’t is actually pushing for significant population increase

After several weeks of public outcry about the reclassification of the Clementi…

不丹下议院压倒性通过同性恋除罪化,仅一议员反对

不丹下议院于上周五(7日)以压倒性票数,几乎全数通过同性恋除罪化。 根据当地媒体《昆色爾报》(Kuensel)与《不丹人報》(Bhutanese)报道,法典第213及214条,被广泛理解为同性恋或将“不自然性行为”定为犯罪,而修正案旨在废除其二项条例。周五(7日)由44人组成的国民会议中,仅有一位议员投下反对票。 然而,修正案必须经过上议院的批准,再经过王室的核准,最终方能通过执行。 少数族群(LGBT)兼维权组织《彩虹不丹》的负责人切藤(Tashi Tsheten)告诉《路透社》“目前最大的优势是我们与现任政府合作,而且对我们的需求也相当了解,这是我国通往人权平等的第一步。” 切藤认为虽然少数群体LGBT普遍能够被不丹社群所接受,但他们仍在落后地区备受歧视。 “要打破其刻板印象仍面临各种困难,而且我们的教育系统并不允许我们了解少数群体LGBT。” 《法新社》引述切藤的说法,“我们是弱势切被边缘化的群体,当我们的权益在国会中被讨论时,我们相当开心。“ 虽然不丹当局从未动用该两项条文,但提出废除法条的财政部长南杰(Namgay Tshering)表示,这些充满歧视性的恶法,已是该国声誉的“污点。” “我们的社会对于少数群体LGBT是非常宽容的。”南杰说道。他认为不丹自2008年君主立宪制以来,这些条文变得多余,社会对于少数群体LGBT是高度接受。 去年,不丹邻国印度也裁定废除将同性恋定为犯罪的殖民地时期的条例,推翻了157年的禁令。虽然曾经历恢复条文,但在2018年最终裁定推翻,不得再被挑战;另外,台湾在今年5月通过同性婚姻专法。由此证明,少数群体LGBT在亚洲国家逐渐走向平等。…