Connect with us

Current Affairs

Blogger Phillip Ang raises inaccuracies in Mothership’s article to MOM; questions why POFMA wasn’t issued

Published

on

On 12 July, Singapore-based online publication Mothership published an article, titled ‘Nearly 400,000 S’poreans have at least S$500,000 in CPF accounts, 100 are aged 35 & below’, which revealed details of Central Provident Fund’s (CPF) Annual Report 2020.

The article mentioned that close to 400,000 Singaporeans have at least half a million in their CPF account, adding that 100 of them are aged 35 and below.

Following this, blogger Phillip Ang sent an email to the Executive Director of the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) Lew Chuen Hong on 25 July, pointing out that there are inaccuracies stated in the article.

In his email seen by TOC, Mr Ang cited CPF’s Annual Report 2020 saying that the mention of “Nearly 400,000 S’poreans” in the article’s headline is not factual as foreigners and Permanent Residents (PRs) are also included in “All CPF Members”.

He asserted that Mothership’s report “appears to be an attempt at sensationalising our ‘successful’ CPF scheme”.

To illustrate further, Mr Ang noted that the table from the Annual Report clearly stated that the total number of “All CPF Members” is 4.05 million, however the number of Singapore citizens as of 2020 is only 3.52 million.

If that’s not all, he also highlighted “other factual inaccuracies” in another two sentences in the article.

The sentences are “Of these nearly 400,000 Singaporeans, 100 are younger than 35 – with 90 between the ages of 30 and 35, and 10 aged 25 to 30” and “The age group with the most number of Singaporeans owning at least S$500,000 (92,880) was between 51 and 55”.

Both these sentences mentioned Singaporeans, but in fact it should be “All CPF Members”, Mr Ang stressed.

Based on these inaccuracies, Mr Ang asked in his email to Mr Lew if Mothership will be issued a Correction Notice by POFMA.

However, the matter was then referred to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), and Mothership’s article was later “updated to accurately reflect the status of CPF members”.

The headline of the article was changed to ‘Nearly 400,000 CPF members have at least S$500,000 in CPF accounts, 100 are aged 35 & below’.

Mothership also replaced the word “Singaporeans” in its earlier write-up to “CPF members”.

Interestingly, Mothership did not update its Facebook post that was sharing the article.

At the time of writing, the headline still appears the same as the initial one.

Screenshot from Mothership’s Facebook page

Why was Mothership allowed to just amend the article without posting a correction notice?

To this, Mr Ang questioned MOM in a separate email – which was also seen by TOC – on why Mothership was allowed to simply amend the article without posting a correction note to inform its readers, which is a standard practice for publications under POFMA.

“And how did the MOM ascertain that the Mothership article was not attempting to spread fake news, ie no need for POFMA office to issue correctional direction?” he asked.

Separately, Mr Ang also said that Mothership’s article highlighted specifically the highest regrossed balance amount of S$500,000 of all CPF members. However, it did not inform readers that there are other important details like more than two million members having less than S$100,000 in their account.

“Was Mothership not trying to mislead?” he questioned.

“Point to note is the ‘fake’ news was easily verifiable. But we needed 11 days to have the article corrected. Without posting a correction note.”

Mothership spared from Correction Notice, but independent news outlets and alternative political parties do not share the same fate

The baffling matter here is that a Correction Notice was not issued by the POFMA office to Mothership for its inaccuracies, but other sites like TOC and The Independent Singapore, as well as alternative political parties like Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) and People’s Voice (PV) have been issued such notices with no hesitation.

In January last year, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) had issued Correction Directions to TOC, journalist Kirsten Han, Yahoo Singapore’s Facebook post, and Malaysian rights group Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) for an article on Singapore’s execution methods in prisons.

In April 2020, the Ministry of Finance (MOF) had also issued Correction Directions to TOC’s Facebook page, PV’s chief Lim Tean, The Temasek Review’s Facebook page, and HardwareZone user ‘darkseidluv’ for sharing an article by a Taiwanese news show on the salary of Temasek Holding’s CEO Ho Ching.

Few months later, the corrections orders were issued by the POFMA Office to SDP, PV, and TOC for publishing an alleged false statement that the CEO of the Housing & Development Board (HDB) had suggested that Singapore’s population will increase to 10 million by 2030.

These are just the many correction directions issued by POFMA to independent sites and alternative parties, but no such order was issued to Mothership for its article.

Background of POFMA

POFMA was enacted in October 2019, which enables authorities to tackle the spread of fake news or false information — particularly from those of foreign origins.

Under the Act, ministers are given the power to order for corrections or removal of online falsehoods, as well as demand for sites spreading such falsehoods to be blocked when they harm public interest.

However, if someone wish to challenge the decisions, it can be done in court after applications to the ministers to vary or cancel the orders are rejected, as the court is the final arbiter.

Mr Low Thia Khiang, former Secretary-General of the Workers’ Party (WP), said in the debate on POFMA that the law gives the minister(s) absolute power to judge what is false and to decide on what action to take.

Mr Low likened it to playing a game in which the minister is both the player and the referee.

“The real aim of the Government through this Bill is to protect the ruling party and achieve political monopoly,” he remarked.

Continue Reading
12 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending