• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
  • Volunteer
    • Internship with The Online Citizen
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
  • zh-hans 简体中文
  • en English
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

MHA owes the public an explanation as to why it chose to flout the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child

"Singapore is a signatory to the Convention on Rights of the Child since 1995."

by The Online Citizen
28/01/2021
in Commentaries, Law & Order, Opinion
Reading Time: 3min read
25
MHA owes the public an explanation as to why it chose to flout the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child

A 16-year-old Singaporean had planned to attack the Assyafaah Mosque (left) along Admiralty Lane and Yusof Ishak Mosque (right) in Woodlands

by Teo Soh Lung

Singapore is a signatory to the Convention on Rights of the Child since 1995.

In 2019 or 2020, the law was amended to grant a person who is below the age of 18 protection under Singapore’s laws. He cannot be prosecuted as an adult.

It took Singapore nearly a quarter of a century to recognise that a person under 18 should be deemed a child and receives adequate protection.

The Internal Security Act (ISA) is the harshest criminal law in Singapore. It does not afford the person arrested and detained a right to be tried in open court and detention is indefinite.

The Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministers can make the wildest allegations against the person but the public will never know if the allegations are true.

I find it incredible that Singapore had used the ISA against a 16-year-old child, and deemed it proper to level wild allegations against him. Even if the allegations have a grain of truth, why is the school, the Ministry of Education, and the Ministry of Community Development unable to deal with the child?

I also find it extremely disturbing that while Singapore is a signatory to the Convention and has raised the age for protection of a child from 16 to 18, the ISD continues to arrest and detain young Singaporeans under the age of 18.

This 16-year-old is not the first child to be arrested and imprisoned under the ISA. A 15-year-old was arrested in January 2020, and is still being detained. In June 2016, a 17-year-old was arrested and detained.

The Ministry of Home Affairs owes the public an explanation as to why it chose to flout the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child which it willingly acceded to in 1995.

This was originally posted on Teo Soh Lung’s Facebook page, and reproduced with permission.

Public trial not suitable for 16-year-old boy who planned to attack Muslims as it may run the risk of deepening religious divides: Minister K Shanmugam

Speaking to the media on Thursday (28 Jan), Minister for Home Affairs K Shanmugam said that the 16-year-old Singaporean who had made plans to attack Muslims here will get a hearing under the Internal Security Act (ISA).

Mr Shanmugam argued that broadcasting the teenager’s motives to public may stir up negative religious sentiments, as reported by TODAY.

The Minister added that the boy’s age was not taken into account when the decision to detain him under the ISA was made.

He was quoted saying, “I think we agree that he is capable of doing harm. And until he’s rehabilitated, if we leave him out, and if he carries out what he intends to do, I think we’ll all be very sorry.”

“Given his age there must be considerable hope that he can be rehabilitated.”

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Tags: Internal Security ActK ShanmugamMinistry of Home Affairs
Subscribe
Connect withD
Login
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Notify of
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Recent Posts

  • UN rights office says at least 18 killed in Myanmar crackdown
  • Water cannon, tear gas at protest outside Thai PM’s residence
  • Philippines receives first COVID-19 vaccines from China
  • Hong Kong police charge dozens of dissidents with security crime
  • Global Times: China and SG conduct joint naval exercise in South China Sea to ‘address risks’
  • 11 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 1 case in migrant workers dorm

Trending posts

UN rights office says at least 18 killed in Myanmar crackdown

Desmond Lee highlights young couple received full $80K HDB grant; Grant means their combined salary is less than $1.5K

Kranji woodland saga: Former HDB deputy CEO says wrong to push responsibility to contractors

Man fined for leaving car “unattended” as he helped son with TraceTogether scan for a few seconds

Can LTA and Minister Ong Ye Kung justify why was I summoned for riding my e-scooter on a walkway when every other riders are doing the same?

How can the torture of a human being over 10 months take place under the watch of a police officer?

Load More
January 2021
MTWTFSS
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Dec   Feb »
  • About Us
  • Volunteer
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

wpDiscuz
25
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply