GE2020 was marked this time around with a number of police reports lodged by parties and citizens alike over various things from damaged campaign posters to statements made by various candidates and alleged falsehoods.

For some of these reports, the Singapore Police Force (SPF) released statements confirming that they were indeed filed. However, there are others which the SPF didn’t directly address, leaving on social media postings and screenshots showing the reports.

In total, we counted 13 reports filed during the campaign period until the Polling Day, 30 June to 10 July.

1 & 2 July 2020

The campaign period started off with a few police reports filed over damaged election posters. There were quite a few of these by both the People’s Action Party (PAP) and the Progress Singapore Party (PSP)

On 1 July, a report was filed by the PAP over one of the damage of their election posters in the area of Hougang Avenue 10. Just a day later, the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) lodged a similar police report about their damaged election posters along Bukit Batok Avenue 5 and Hougang Ave 10.

The SPF said in a statement that a 51-year old and a 13-year old were being investigated for those two separate cases.

4 & 5 July July 2020

Another poster related police report was filed by the PAP on 4 July over damaged election posters in Woodlands Street 13. This time, a 48-year old man was arrested for allegedly damaging those posters.

There were also reports made against several candidates who were running in the election. Two reports were filed, on 4 and 5 July, against Workers’ Party (WP)’s Raeesah Khan who stood for election and won in Sengkang GRC. The report alleged that she made comments on her social media pages a while back which promoted enmity between different racial and religious groups. Investigations are ongoing.

The SPF said investigations are ongoing.

6 July 2020

Following this, a citizen lodged a report against the PAP’s statement about Ms Khan. A citizen on Facebook revealed on Monday (6 July) that he has filed this report to “hold the PAP accountable for an ‘offence of promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion or race under Section 298A of the Penal Code’ as well as the spreading of online falsehoods.”

On this, the SPF released a statement to say that no offence was found after consultation with the Attorney-General’s Chambers.

7 July 2020

Another report also arose from this specifically against a Facebook user who claimed to be one of the first people to “leak” Ms Khan’s earlier social media comments which are now the subject of a police investigation. SPF confirmed on 7 July that reports were filed against the Facebook user who goes by “Abdul Malik Mohammed Ghazali” on the platform.

“The Police are looking into the alleged offences of posting comments on social media with deliberate intent to wound religious or racial feelings under Section 298 of the Penal Code and harassment under Section 4 of the Protection from Harassment Act,” the SPF asserted.

Police investigations are currently ongoing.

Separately on a similar allegation as that made against Ms Khan, another report was lodged on 7 July against PAP’s Heng Swee Keat—who contested and won in East Coast GRC—in relation to his response to a question posed to him at a student’s forum in 2019 at Nanyang Technology University where he said that he doesn’t think Singapore is ready for a non-Chinese Prime Minister.

However in this case, the SPF said that the Attorney-General’s Chambers advice was that no offence was committed and that Mr Heng’s remarks, in context, “do not evidence any intent to wound anyone’s racial feelings or promote enmity between different races.”

On 7 July, a police report was filed against PAP’s Ong Ye Kung for allegedly abetting a primary school child to participate in election activity. This was in relation to a video he had earlier shared on Facebook of him talking to a boy in school uniform. The video was taken down on 2 July after Mr Ong was informed by authorities that it is not in line with electoral rules.

The person who filed the report told TOC that the police informed him that they have begun investigations in to the matter.

8 July

PSP also lodged another poster damage police report on 8 July, this time over posters in Jurong West Street 92.

On the same day, a report was filed against PAP’s Bukit Batok SMC candidate over alleged falsehood made in a video in which Mr Pillai talked about a “scurrilous attack” against his family.”

The report alleged that there was no evidence of any video to have surfaced which “attacked” Mr Pillai’s son’s criminal history as he has said in the video. As such, the report alleged, “there is reason to believe that Murali Pillai contravened the POFMA act. He has spread fakenews based on falsehood.”

Also on 8 July, The Online Citizen (TOC) editor Terry Xu filed a police report against a commentary Facebook page Critical Spectator on Tuesday (7 July), over its posts made in relation to the ongoing General Election (GE), citing foreign intervention. In the report it was noted that Michael Petraeus is the man behind the Facebook page and that he is a Polish national.

After the report was filed, Facebook unpublished the Critical Spectator page from its platform.

10 July 2020

On 10 July, a police report was lodged by a citizen against former ambassador-at-large Bilahari Kausikan over a Facebok post he made on Cooling Off Day (9 July) in which he rebuked PSP’s Lee Hsien Yang, who is the younger son of founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. The report alleged that the post sought to “influence the public on election partisan politics”.

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SG High Commissioner rebuts The Economist on freedom of speech in Singapore

By TREmeritus The Economist writing about the media situation in Singapore last…

Dissent requires responsibility, says prominent legal academic Simon Tay

With the recent conversation around protests and dissent in Singapore, prominent legal…

人民协会:加强防疫措施 明日妆艺大游行如期举行

2020妆艺大游行主办单位官方脸书今日(30日)发通告,有关游行仍会如期在明日(1月31日)指2月1日举行。 通告称人民协会将监督情况,并与相关机构合作和更新资讯。当局表示将根据本地新型冠状病毒进展,酌量更动或取消活动。 人协表示现场将进行体温检测、投入更多医护人员到场协助。 “我们呼吁群众保持警惕,并维持良好个人卫生习惯,如有不适应立即就医和呆在家休息。”当局也指出如在活动现场有人出现不适,可立即寻求现场工作人员求助。 根据《8视界》报导,人协总执行理事长陈国明则表示,希望透过设立体温检测站等措施,能给观众安全感。表演者也每天有接受体温检测,表演当天也会量体温。 预计明后天的妆艺大游行,一天人流量可达到逾万人。

疲于抗疫还遭民非议“带菌” 医护人员社媒真心询问“怎样应对”

工作了整天,拖着疲惫的身躯要登上公交回家,却遭他人有意无意地表示“不卫生”、“身带病菌”时,你会作何感想?一名医护人员表示,在这个非常时期,“下班后已经很累了,只好沉默地下车”,令闻者动容,安慰他之余也给予打气。 在陈笃生医院就职的医护人员Benzeemin日前在Instagram帖文,分享了遭人驱赶下公交的经过,对所遭遇的不平对待感到“疲惫”和不解。他也表示,这并非他首次遇到类似的情况了。 他指出,在这非常时期,医院内的工作就犹如战争,简直就非常糟糕,每天和家人道别出门后,就投入“战场”中。“你需要穿上多层的保护罩,确保处于感染区,身上不会带着任何病毒回家。你需要带上面罩、眼罩、N95口罩,有的还要带上电动空气净化呼吸器(PARP)”。身穿多层“保护罩”,工作还要迅速,每一步还要非常小心谨慎,因为“生命很重要”。 他表示,身为医护人员,下班后自然需要进行一番清理后,穿上自豪的医护人员制服,岂知在回家途中乘上公交时,却遭到民众的指责和冷眼相待。“人们会提高他们的声音,说你带着病菌,说你可能会把病菌传染给他人,说你‘不够慎重’,然而你只有安静地离开地铁或巴士,因为你已疲于工作,懒得解释你的立场了。” 帖文中他也表示,因为“生命可贵”,这场“抗疫战争”需要他们,医护人员们的假期被冻结,基于伴侣也是前线的医护人员,所以两人的婚礼也因为新型冠状病毒疫情而被迫取消,但是他们都没有怨言。 “告诉我,面对类似状况,我们应该怎样反应?难道我们不像大家一样都是人吗?难道我们不爱彼此吗?难道我们不希望有假期吗?” 他分享了一张脸上印有口罩留下的疤痕照片,帖文第一句话就是“我奋战的疤痕”,似乎在展现他的“努力成果”之余,也影射了社会留下的“伤疤”。 他的帖文分享至今,已经获得超过4000分赞,网民们纷纷对他以及其他医护人员的付出表示感谢和佩服,为他们的努力打气。 网民也呼吁医护人员谨慎工作,保护好自己和周围的他人,至于其他人的无礼对待和不了解,就不要放在心上。“没有你们在前线抗疫,我们不可能打赢这场防疫‘战’”、“这是非常时期,我们应该团结起来,互相给予支持”、“加油!”。