The Online Citizen (TOC)’s editor, Terry Xu has filed a police report against a commentary Facebook page Critical Spectator on Tuesday (7 July), over its posts made in relation to the ongoing General Election (GE).

Mr Xu posted the police report on Facebook on Tuesday, citing the Channels News Asia (CNA)’s article – which was published on 28 April 2019 – that stated Michael Petraeus is the man behind the Facebook page, who happens to be a Polish national.

“Under s83 [Section 83(1)(d)] of the Parliament[ary] Election Act, No person — who is not a citizen of Singapore, shall take part in any election activity,” he noted.

Mr Xu also cited the Election Department (ELD)’s advisory that was issued on 20 April. It cautioned political parties to “lodge a police report immediately” and “keep the Elections Department informed”, should they detect anything that could be “indicative of foreign interference in the GE”.

“As no one has done so, I have filed a police report on behalf of the political parties,” he wrote.

In the post, Mr Xu pointed out three posts published by Critical Spectator which he claimed contained “clear intent to influence the election by criticising a candidate from a particular party and on policies proposed by various parties”.

The first post was published on Tuesday (7 July), in which Mr Petraeus had criticised the Workers’ Party (WP) candidate Raeesah Khan’s role model as American Marxist feminist Angela Davis. He described Angela Davis as one of the most “odious” and “repugnant characters of the American left”.

“It’s taken a bit of mulling for me to decide whether to write this post but, ultimately, I think that as someone coming from a communist country I can’t let this issue slide,” he wrote, as he went on to explain about Angela Davis.

In another post on 6 July, Mr Petraeus compared Ms Raeesah’s case with the People’s Action Party (PAP) former candidate Ivan Lim’s case – who withdrew his candidacy after a wave of online criticism appeared over his behaviour at work and during National Service (NS).

He questioned the rationale behind Singaporeans’ support towards Ms Raeesah after she apologised on her past comments that allegedly promote “enmity between different groups on grounds of religion or race”, while Mr Lim was “mercilessly hounded” and labelled as “elitist”.

“And yet, all she did was to say she’s sorry – and all I can see and read in response are voices of support and encouragement? I’m sorry, but what’s going on?” Mr Petraeus added.

While the third post that Mr Xu highlighted was made on 5 July, where Mr Petraeus wrote about why he thinks GST should be raised in Singapore instead of tapping on the nation’s reserves.

“Since some people have suggested tapping the nation’s vast reserves instead of raising the goods & services tax, I think it’s in everybody’s best interest to understand the difference in consequences between the two options,” he stated.

Xu notes that the Police has not contacted him in regards to the filed report as of time of publication.

Another Singapore citizen raised the issue about Critical Spectator Facebook page to the ELD

Meanwhile, a Singapore citizen who goes by the name Ng alerted TOC that he had also raised the issue to ELD on 30 June.

In his email to the ELD, Ng noted that his enquiry is based on the ELD’s guidelines for the mitigation of foreign interference in the GE which was published on CNA on 18 June.

The article states, “Only Singaporeans can take part in elections and campaigning. Any citizen who wants to conduct an election activity – whether online, offline, or both – for a candidate must have a written authority signed by the candidate or his election agent.”

“As I understand, ELD has stated that ‘Individuals who are not citizens of Singapore are prohibited from taking part in any election activity’.

“However, it has come to my attention that the Facebook and webpage “Critical Spectator” run by one Michael Petraeus, a Polish national, has been running politically charged articles which actively seek to shape the political narrative,” he noted.

Noting that Mr Petraeus is not a citizen of Singapore, Ng asked the ELD if the articles posted on Critical Spectator contravene with its regulations and the consequences that Mr Petraeus might be facing.

“Given that this individual is not a citizen of Singapore, nor his sources of funding transparently stated, I would like to enquire if these articles contravene ELD regulations and if so, what further actions might be taken,” he said.

Two days later on 2 July, Ng received a reply from the ELD stating that it was indeed “correct” that “individuals who are not citizens of Singapore are prohibited from taking part in any election activity”.

It added, “Election activity includes any activity which is done for the purpose of promoting or procuring the electoral success for any political party or candidate; or prejudicing the electoral prospects of other political parties or candidates at the election.”

“We will look into the matter. Thank you for your feedback,” said the ELD, without stating the actions that will be taken against Mr Petreaus.

TOC notes that no further response has been issued to Ng.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dr Paul Tambyah clarifies against allegation made by former NMP Calvin Cheng’s comment, but Cheng still insists in his claim

On 10 April (Wednesday), former Nominated Member of Parliament Calvin Cheng took…

民主党:政府恰恰错过关键时机 让新加坡进行必要改革

上月18日,副总理兼财政部长宣布2020财政预算案,对此新加坡民主党主席淡马亚(Paul Tambyah),曾点评今年财案“充满小调整,却缺乏大胆举措”。 本周三,民主党再举办网络论坛直播。该党认为政府看似过于专注“微调而复杂的计划”,却恰恰错过了一个关键的时机,让新加坡进行必要的改革,以减低工薪阶层与中产阶级的财政负担。 民主党连同财政主管林文兴、主席淡马亚、江伟贤以及Alfred Tan回应2020 财政预算案,并针对几项关键措施与问题提出建议与看法。 首先针对增加消费税一事,林文兴表示,鉴于新加坡的中产阶级与工薪阶层正受困于日益高昂的生活成本,政府应将调涨消费税(GST)的计划取消,而不仅仅是推迟。 林文兴:应取消调涨消费税 因为这大大影响了工薪一族的财务管理、工作效能甚至是退休前景,而且新加坡的外汇储备已相当膨胀,为何仍需要提高消费税? 他指出,“自2016至2018年,我们所累计的财政盈余(budget surplus)已高达191亿美元,即使将扣除赤字109亿美元,我们仍有82亿元的余额。” 林文兴亦提及,曾任副总理的尚曼达于2015年大选前的声明,表示应取消医疗等基本必需品的消费税,提高奢侈品的消费税。…

总理李显龙:无意废除刑法第377A条 但不曾阻止性少数群体生活

尽管政府并无意废除刑事法典第377A条,但总理李显龙表示并不曾阻碍任何公民生活的权力,以及科技人才的流入。 根据我国刑事法典第377A节条文,男性同性性行为属犯罪行为,一旦罪名成立可被判监禁长达两年。 李显龙总理昨日(26日)以主宾身份出席智慧国峰会,面对与会者提问,关于同性恋者的劳动者是否会纳入我国法律的保障时,总理则回应,377A条文仍“将保留在法律中一段时期”。 不边缘化性少数群体 然而,他续指,保有部分的条例,并不代表新加坡会将性少数族群(LGBTQ)边缘化,犹如刑法第377A条并不阻止粉红点每年的聚会。 “你知道新加坡的条例,无论是何种性倾向的人民 ,你都欢迎在新加坡工作。”他说。 “这就是我们的社会,我们并不像旧金山或其他中东国家,(我们)都是这里的人民…还有基于此条例架构,我们完全可以为科技与不同文化景象创造无限可能。”他指出。 李显龙的一番言论也引起广大网民的讨论,许多人分享自身与总理观点相反的经验。 网友Fourier Ang :我已经因为刑法377A条例离开新加坡…

两学生托管中心 114师生集体食物中毒

莱佛士学生托管中心,旗下两家位于新民小学和丰原小学(Fern Green)的托管中心,周二发生集体食物中毒事件。 共有108学生,六名职员吃过午餐后身体不适,出现肠胃炎症状。其中新民小学有八名学生受影响,两人目前在家休养。 目前,校方和食品局等各造正调查这起事故,也与新的供应商合作。莱佛士学生托管中心也为受影响学生提供协助。