A member of the Pioneer Generation who goes with the surname Lee recently gave an interview to TOC. Mr Lee was born in 1947 and as such, belongs to the Pioneer Generation. As a young adult, he grew up with Singapore under then founding PM Lee Kuan Yew and DPM Goh Keng Swee, when Singapore began its industrialization. At the time in late 60s and 70s, Singapore started to invite MNCs to invest in Singapore.

1. What was your job in the past before your retirement?

I started off in the government service after school in 1966, then moved on to the private sector after three years in a period seen to be the beginning of the industrialization phase in Singapore. I started off as a first line exempt staff and I retired in 2010 at the age of 63 in a senior management position at an MNC.

2. Can you tell us the difference between then and now in Singapore?

I must confess that I have lived the golden era of Singapore when career advancement and opportunities were plentiful and if one were to put one’s shoulder to the wheel, material comfort, immense job and life satisfaction came readily. I was able to support my parents and my family of four on a single income and comfortably so, financing my children through local tertiary education. My wife resigned from the civil service right after the birth of my first child. Not so today in an environment where even a dual income family finds difficulties in getting by with the astronomical high cost of living.

3. How were the previous generation of PAP leaders?

I thrived and succeeded beyond the wildest imaginations under the 1G/2G leadership teams. They were seen to be doing no wrongs, every socioeconomic policy executed to perfection, almost clockworks with the well beings of the citizens in minds.

4. How do you feel about the current generation of PAP leaders?

They are seen to be doing no right, an echo chamber of group thinkers, in-breeding, empathy deficit, acutely deficient in responsibility and accountability to the people. No one at the top has been taken to tasks for the innumerable failings from SMRT breakdowns to the CV-19 dorm infestation etc.

5. Does your PG card help you in anyway?

In very limited ways, centering on healthcare subsidies, the parsimonious 3% NTUC FairPrice groceries discounts twice a week and the $200/= MediSave top-up a year. All with fine print caps and encumbrances. My home marginally exceeds the AV of $21K and hence excluded from a series of social transfers like the quarterly GST vouchers, U-rebates etc. Not that I clamour for such tokenism, it count for little in an extremely high cost of living environment. But what I ask for is a fairer and just society where our forward generations are assured of social mobility in their life journeys.

6. How are you living now as a retiree? Is your CPF enough?

I have learned to live frugally and made painful adjustments and the CPF Life payouts are far from sufficient to accord a decent living standard.

7. What was the first house you bought and was it affordable?

I was brought up living in a two room rented flat in Tiong Bahru, formerly SIT (Singapore Improvement Trust) build by the colonial government. After marriage, I bought a HDB 5-room flat for $27K with a sea-view to boot. No mortgage loan needed, cash and CPF upfront. After five years, I upgraded to a sizeable freehold condominium, $370K, paid off in three years and living in it till today. I lived free from the burden of debts.

8. What about your children? How are they coping with housing?

Not so with my children, they will be saddled with the burden of mortgage debts for in excess of twenty years. When my second child got married, buying a pigeon hole 4-room HDB flat in a mature estate, it cost in excess of $550K. The reason for buying the HDB flat in a mature estate is because she wanted to stay closer to my wife and I.

As a father, I had to fork out a significant sum out of my retirement funds so that she could have a head start in life. In extended ways, they are still somewhat needing my assistance to make life a little bearable. I am dead worried and concerned about the futures of my children and grandchildren.

9. How are your peers doing?

There are a good number of them struggling with the brutalities that life here bestowed on them in the twilight of their years. Many have downgraded their flats, encashed to live out their remaining years, even from condominium to HDB flats. Their children, tertiary educated, unemployed or under-employed for the past many years. Two cases of which their children suffered psychological setbacks and lost their self-esteem, requiring psychological counseling. Several of them age 7O and above went back to work as security guards and in the gig economy when previously they were in executive positions.

10. What do you hope to see happen in Singapore?

A government focused on the well being of the citizens and a keenly contested parliament with ideas to bring Singapore back to the glorious past of the 1G/2G eras and a less crowded, rat race environment.

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Public servants in political parties – politically neutral?

Chew Thiam Kwee and Victor Lye are both public servants. One is…

网民比拇指赞家教良好 暖心女路边帮阿嬷收纸皮

善心女子帮助路边的阿嬷收纸皮,从白天收到黑夜,举止令人动容。一名路人见状拍视频录下女子帮助阿嬷的善举,上载到网站上,网民看了纷纷按赞,指女子家教良好,天使心肠。 有关的视频是由网民Raymond(55岁,德士司机)所录制。他当时是在吉兰丹巷(Kelantan Lane),准备前往用晚餐时看见这一幕。岂知在他用了晚餐后返回现场时,发现女子还在现场帮助阿嬷,所以决定拍下放上公民新闻网站STOMP。 从白天到黑夜 视频中,身穿培德中学红色汗衫的女子背着背包,站在阿嬷用来收纸皮的手推车旁边,不断帮忙阿嬷将纸皮拿起、折好后收入另一个纸盒中。 Raymond在受询时指出,当时他用完晚餐后已约晚上8时,看到女子还在帮助阿嬷,就趋前询问女子是不是一名义工。 他表示,当事女子腼腆的回答不是,只是想帮助老人家而已。 父亲以女儿为荣 女子帮助阿嬷到天黑,他的父亲见女儿天黑还未回家就出来寻找,发现女儿在住家附近帮助阿嬷收纸皮。Raymond当时就称赞女子的热心行为,女子父亲也表示以女儿为荣。 Raymond表示,阿嬷当时告诉女子父亲,曾经以潮州语向女子表示不用帮忙,但是女子好似不明白。她随后用手势和女子沟通,教女子将纸皮折平后,放入一个大的纸箱里。 阿嬷赞女子乖巧可爱 91岁的阿嬷郑应兰在隔日受询问时,证实了这件事情。她表示那名女子长相可爱、乖巧…

成基层领袖  孩子获推荐入良校? 迈杰思幼园急回收误导信函

家长成为居委会自愿者,可换取孩子升学小学推荐信?一则发自亮阁区迈杰思幼儿园校方,鼓励家长注册成为自愿者的信函引起误会和混淆,有关当局已发文告澄清,并回收误导性信函。 本月27日,在题为《申请成为河谷林居民委员会自愿者》的信函,亮阁区迈杰思幼儿园,告知学生家长/监护人。他们将获优先权,申请成为河谷居民委员会的基层领袖。 “这将使您获得升学本区小学,例如河谷林小学的升学推荐信。” 该信函称,该校积极响应河谷林居民委员会许多活动,家长可在这些活动扮演领导角色,获得活跃基层领袖的地位。信中也鼓励家长积极参与和主办至少两项主要活动,以期能成为活跃基层领袖。 “我们的目的是协助家长减轻一年级入学的压力。同时回馈社会,促进邻里合作和团队精神。”信函呼吁有兴趣的家长,可在8月2日前签署和提交注册表格到该校。 网民:自愿者获特权,偏离服务宗旨 本地社媒“爱新加坡”在其粉丝专页公开此信函,大多网民皆不认同“争取成为居委基层领袖,获小学推荐信”的安排,认为此举扭曲了真诚为社区服务的精神。 河谷林居民委员会立即在脸书澄清,该信函是在该居委会完全不知情的情况下,由校方发出。 居委会表示,虽然迈杰思鼓励家长积极参与社区的立意虽好,但很遗憾,信中提及的资讯不恰当也不准确。 “我们已照会迈杰思校方,对方也对此事致歉,并同意回收有关信函。”在帖文中居委会,也附上了来自迈杰思校方的澄清书。 迈杰思:信函未咨询居委会和总部 这封誌期29日的澄清信,是以亮阁区迈杰思幼儿园首席执行员王瑞连(译音)名义发出,表示前述信函,乃由该校发出,未曾咨询居委会和迈杰思总部的意见。“信中内容不正确也不符事实。”…