PAP’s Murali Pillai on the GE2020 campaign trail (Source: Murali Pillai / Facebook)

A police report was made against PAP candidate Murali Pillai on 8 July by a citizen named Royston Albert over the video Mr Pillai made about a “scurrilous attack” against his family.

The report, filed earlier today (8 July), referred to Mr Pillai’s Facebook video on 30 June in which he claimed that there was a “scurrilous attack” made on his family, specifically an attack on his son regarding his criminal background. It added that there was no mention of whether the post was made on social media or other platforms.

It went on to read, “He posted a video of himself explaining that the post was an attack on his son with regards to his criminal background and suggested that the post was made minutes after election was declared in the Bukit Batok SMC thereby suggesting that it was an attack to damage his candidacy and the election campaign.”

Mr Albertson continued in the report by saying that he tried to search for the video that Mr Pillai claimed was circulating but to no avail apart from a news article from years ago which talked about his son’s criminal past.

He wrote, “However, it seemed that there was perhaps no such post that attacked his family or son that was particularly being circulated on 30th June as mentioned by him. No such post appeared on any of the various local media platforms or Facebook pages. Nor was there any such post circulated via WhatsApp groups of private chats as far as I know.”

Adding that he had personally searched various media platforms and search engines for the video Mr Pillai was talking about, the man said he “did not find anything on the matter, except news about his son’s criminal past which was reported many years back which still exists online”. He added that even checks with his friends and online media Facebook pages turned up empty.

“As such, there is reason to believe that Murali Pillai contravened the POFMA act,” said the report.

“He has spread fakenews based on falsehood. In particular, he has contravened POFMA Act Part 2 Section 7(1)(a), (b), (iv) where his falsehood may have been to influence the outcome of his own election campaign, a general election of members of parliament.”

It continued, “In view of the above, I strongly urge the Singapore Police Force to investigate the authenticity of his video claims on the ‘scurrilous attack’ of his own and that to show evidence that such a post existed and that he should make a police report on that post which he claims has hurt him and is damaging his family.”

“Otherwise, he should be investigated for spreading fakenews and falsehood. I also strongly urge the POFMA agency to take this matter seriously and to thoroughly investigate Murali Pillai for his video post on his Facebook page,” the report concluded.

The video that the report mentions was posted by Mr Pillai on 30 June on his Facebook page. In it, he said that a post has been circulating online highlighting his son’s past offences, and it surfaced “minutes after election has been declared in Bukit Batok SMC” on Tuesday.

The MP, who is a lawyer, added that the timing to which the post surfaced “leaves nothing to imagination”.

The politician also stated that he is not a perfect father and all families have issues, but these should not be involved in politics.

“Yes, I’m not a perfect father. Yes, families have issues. But no, these things should not be brought into politics. I’m terribly affected by this, but I will not be deterred. I will fight on,” he said.

On the same day, Mr Pillai’s opponent in Bukit Batok SMC, Singapore Democratic Party’s (SDP) Chee Soon Juan came forward to condemn the attack and urged people not to circulate it.

He wrote in a Facebook post, “I have just been told that there is a video circulating about Mr Murali’s family. I haven’t seen it myself but I have watched Mr Murali’s anguished response to it,” he wrote in a Facebook post.

He added, “I stand with Mr Murali on this and call on whoever who did this to stop it and for others not to circulate it”.

Curiously, on 30 June, just before Mr Pillai posted the video of himself alleging this “scurrilous attack”, someone had sent a letter to various media outlets, including TOC, which called to question Mr Pillai’s eligibility as a candidate in the election based on his son’s history.

The letter described Mr Pillai’s son’s criminal past and brushes with the law and asserted that Mr Pillai and his family should “lead by example”, urging relevant authorities to look into the matter and to ensure that citizens have a “proper leader” for their constituency.

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NTUC central committee unanimously supports Ng Chee Meng as its secretary-general

The National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) Central Committee stands in “unanimous support”…

TOC Perspectives: Views on AWARE

Two notes by NUS lecturer and a petition to MOE by parents.

从许文远称“采用创新科技不求领先” 一窥我国交通科技投资现况

基础建设统筹部长兼交通部长许文远,声称我国在采用创新科技方面不求领先,认为公交等基础服务采用创新科技时不应操之过急,需花时间先充分理解,包括参与研发和实验。 根据《联合早报》报导,许文远在昨日出席智能交通系统世界大会,在开幕礼致词时称,科技非交通系统唯一考量,从政治角度看,最重要是提供安全可靠、大众负担得起的交通系统。 他认为任何智能交通系统,都应睿智地研发和使用,他以拥车证和公路电子收费(ERP)为例,解释科技如何改善交通。 不过许文远似乎很支持5G网络,认为“有无限潜能”,可推动无人驾驶车成长,也能勇于新一代大士港,应尽快采用。 同时,政府大量投资在公交,每年为公交运营成本拨款近20亿元津贴。 他也提醒智能交通系统的利弊,包括可能出现采用科技的私召车Grab服务,与传统德士司机之间的鸿沟;智能化交通系统也存在受数码攻击的风险。 上述智能交通系统世界大会首次在新加坡举办,来自80各国家约一万多名交通领域人士、学者、企业和政府机构等,参与研讨交通系统议题和新方案。 对特斯拉电动车“不感兴趣” 事实上,或许内阁当中不仅是许文远对引入创新交通科技“不求领先”。 积极推广电动车的特斯拉(TESLA)总裁埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk),曾批评新加坡似乎对于推广电动车行动迟缓,并在今年1月的推文称“政府对推动电动车不感冒”。 We…

Heng supports former Govt chief planner’s view of having 10M population in S’pore

At a ministerial dialogue at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) yesterday (28 Mar),…