The Facebook user who claimed he was “one of the first” to leak the Workers’ Party (WP) candidate Raeesah Khan’s comments on social media is now being investigated by the police. They are looking into his alleged comments that contain deliberate intent to wound religious or racial feelings, and for harassment.

The Singapore Police Force (SPF) stated on Tuesday (7 July) that reports have been lodged against the Facebook user who used the moniker “Abdul Malik Mohammed Ghazali”.

“The Police are looking into the alleged offences of posting comments on social media with deliberate intent to wound religious or racial feelings under Section 298 of the Penal Code and harassment under Section 4 of the Protection from Harassment Act,” the SPF asserted.

Police investigations are currently ongoing.

This came after Mr Abdul Malik aired his controversial views publicly on Facebook following two reports that were lodged against Ms Raeesah, with regards to her comments on social media that allegedly promote “enmity between different groups on grounds of religion or race”.

In his Facebook post on 5 July, he hinted that he was among the first to leak Ms Raeesah’s comments and expressed his hopes for her candidacy in the General Election (GE) to come to “an abrupt end”.

Moreover, Mr Abdul Malik seems to be making a threat against her father by saying, “Who cares about your father? SMCCI very big, meh? Best for you to step down, Raeesa[h], or he’ll be next.” This explains why he was being investigated under Section 4 of the Protection from Harassment Act.

The Facebook post, however, has since been deleted or made private after it garnered a negative response from many people.

Meanwhile, some netizens then started to dig out old tweets of him that contain a racial slur, which explains why Mr Abdul Malik is now being charged with an offence of posting deliberate intent to wound religious or racial feelings under Section 298 of the Penal Code.

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

无理取闹延宕投诉进程 卫生部设新纪委会提高诉案效率

卫生部工作小组认为一些无理取闹的投诉造成了“浪费公帑与严重不公”的现象,未来可能将采取强制承担诉讼中的费用。 卫生部工作小组近期内针对获取知情同意程序,以及新加坡医药理事会纪律程序进行检讨,昨日(3日)公布结果,其中对卫生部提出28项建议,均以被卫生部接受。 工作小组认为目前医药理事会处理投诉的现有程序过于冗长,至少需要四年以上才能将所有的案件处理完毕,因此为提高效率,卫生部将成立新的纪律委员会,将投诉案件在一年半内结案。 就现有程序而言,医药理事会在接获病患投诉后会先成立投诉委员(Complaints Committee)进行调查,再视案件的轻重判决,轻者将会受到警告信,重者则转交纪律审裁庭(Disciplinary Tribunal)展开进一步审讯。 《联合早报》报道,卫生部工作小组委员黄长彦医生受访时说,“调查、提控和审裁均由医理会所负责。我们小组建议把审裁的工作分出来,纪律审裁庭日后会由独立的纪律委员会成立,以提高审理程序的透明度。” 为提高效率,工作小组建议医药理事会成立工作小组建议成立投诉小组(Complaints Panel),在接获通报后会先成立调查委员会(Inquiry Committee)初步审查,筛选案件,于三周内决定是否受理案件。 经评估后,若委员会判定投诉并无其合理性,将需承担诉讼期间的费用。而诉讼人则可在接获通知后的14天内,向高院申请复审。 卫生部也计划成立新的纪律委员会(Disciplinary…

TOC Focus Week: The Wright route to success

This is our sixth article in our Focus Week on people who,…

不丹下议院压倒性通过同性恋除罪化,仅一议员反对

不丹下议院于上周五(7日)以压倒性票数,几乎全数通过同性恋除罪化。 根据当地媒体《昆色爾报》(Kuensel)与《不丹人報》(Bhutanese)报道,法典第213及214条,被广泛理解为同性恋或将“不自然性行为”定为犯罪,而修正案旨在废除其二项条例。周五(7日)由44人组成的国民会议中,仅有一位议员投下反对票。 然而,修正案必须经过上议院的批准,再经过王室的核准,最终方能通过执行。 少数族群(LGBT)兼维权组织《彩虹不丹》的负责人切藤(Tashi Tsheten)告诉《路透社》“目前最大的优势是我们与现任政府合作,而且对我们的需求也相当了解,这是我国通往人权平等的第一步。” 切藤认为虽然少数群体LGBT普遍能够被不丹社群所接受,但他们仍在落后地区备受歧视。 “要打破其刻板印象仍面临各种困难,而且我们的教育系统并不允许我们了解少数群体LGBT。” 《法新社》引述切藤的说法,“我们是弱势切被边缘化的群体,当我们的权益在国会中被讨论时,我们相当开心。“ 虽然不丹当局从未动用该两项条文,但提出废除法条的财政部长南杰(Namgay Tshering)表示,这些充满歧视性的恶法,已是该国声誉的“污点。” “我们的社会对于少数群体LGBT是非常宽容的。”南杰说道。他认为不丹自2008年君主立宪制以来,这些条文变得多余,社会对于少数群体LGBT是高度接受。 去年,不丹邻国印度也裁定废除将同性恋定为犯罪的殖民地时期的条例,推翻了157年的禁令。虽然曾经历恢复条文,但在2018年最终裁定推翻,不得再被挑战;另外,台湾在今年5月通过同性婚姻专法。由此证明,少数群体LGBT在亚洲国家逐渐走向平等。…