The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP)’s election campaign was rendered “pointless” as one of its “Four Yes, One No” campaign” key plank, “1 No”, has been proven a “falsehood”, said the People’s Action Party (PAP) on Thursday (2 July).

Earlier on Wednesday (1 July), SDP’s chief Chee Soon Juan mentioned at an inter-political debate ahead of the General Election (GE) that PAP candidate Heng Swee Keat was “toying with the idea” of increasing Singapore’s population to 10 million people.

PAP’s candidate Vivian Balakrishnan – who took part in the debate – refuted his point, saying that it was “false statement” and Dr Chee was raising a “false straw man”.

After the GE debate – which was televised over Mediacorp Channel 5 on Wednesday – Mr Heng took to Facebook to deny that he ever targeted a 10-million population and posted a video of his dialogue at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Student Union Ministerial Forum in 2019.

In response, SDP announced on Facebook that it had “successfully extracted an assurance from the PAP that it has no intention of increasing the population to 6.9 or 10 million”.

The PAP released a statement hours later, accusing Dr Chee of twisting the facts to claim that SDP had “achieved victory” by extracting a promise from the PAP that it had no intention to increase the population to 10 million.

“Having been proven wrong, the honourable thing for Dr Chee to do would have been to admit that SDP’s election campaign was based on a falsehood, withdraw it, and apologise to Singaporeans for misleading them. But that would have been out of character,” the PAP wrote.

The Party noted that Dr Chee has “staged this drama before” when he refused to apologise for his use of wrong data on healthcare subsides at a Parliamentary Select Committee in 1996.

“Dr Chee first conjures a bogey out of thin air to befuddle, frighten and divide Singaporeans. When it is pointed out to him the bogey doesn’t exist, he claims someone else had “toyed” with the idea first.

“And when it is shown conclusively that someone else had done no such thing, he waves his arms triumphantly in the air, proclaiming, ‘see, I slayed the bogey’,” it added.

The PAP continued, “The ‘1 No’ is a key plank in the SDP’s election campaign. Its falsehood renders the campaign pointless, and calls into question the integrity of the whole party.”

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Has SP Power been overcharging consumers some 21% more all these while?

The Energy Market Authority (EMA) announced the launch of the Open Electricity…

Phase 2 five-person rule makes election campaigning virtually impossible for alternative politicians

According to reports in the Straits Times, six members of the Progress…

A Possible Indirect Admission of a Strategic Policy Failure

By Chua Suntong – On 25 September 2012, the Ministry of Trade…

媒体人访谈揭新闻审查确实存在(附完整视频)

本社前日在脸书专页上载了一段主流媒体人在一场研讨会上的谈话剪接视频,揭示本地新闻界同仁新闻价值观和他们面对的新闻审查。对此,有读者要求本社上载完整视频,读者可点开以下的脸书链接,观赏完整现场录影。 有关访谈片段是录制于2016年,主题为《所有关于你想知道、却不敢问的电视与媒体业界情况》对话会上。 对话会由新加坡科技设计大学(SUTD)人文学院讲师罗林(James Rowlins)主持,邀请《亚洲新闻台》“Talking Point”主持人暨编辑Steven Chia、“局内人”数码团队制作人蓝淑珊(译音),以及高级制作人罗敏敏(译音),和学生听众分享在媒体业界的经验。 完整视频时间全长40余分钟,有兴趣者可点开脸书链接观赏,本文也节录与原先剪接视频相关的访谈的内容。 除了聆听受访媒体人分享新闻制作经验,讲师罗林抛出尖锐问题,指出新加坡有严重的新闻审查现象,新闻自由全球排名仅154,还落后于印尼和马国,询问在新加坡的媒体,是否有自我审查的现象? “媒体不扮演监督角色” 对此,Steven Chia在回答时表示,新加坡做的一套都有原因,媒体并不肩负“看门狗”(监督)政治领袖和政府的角色。 “我们有做政治宣传吗?有的!政治宣传也不是贬义词,政治宣传就是让民众知道发生了什么。很多时候我们也协助政府传达信息。”…