The Kopi, an online journalistic site, recently interviewed Prof Bilveer Singh who thinks that PAP will entirely wipe out opposition in this GE (‘This NUS Professor Predicts That GE2020 Will Be a Landslide Victory for the PAP‘, 29 Jun).

Prof Singh is the Deputy Head of Political Science Department in NUS. He is the author of a number of books on Singapore’s politics: ‘Is the People’s Action Party Here to Stay?’ (2019), ‘Understanding Singapore’s Politics’ (2017) and ‘Politics and Governance in Singapore: An Introduction’ (2007).

In the interview, Prof Singh thinks PAP will win by landslide in this GE. “It is without a doubt that GE2020 will be a landslide victory for the PAP. In fact, the opposition may be entirely annihilated this election. Singaporean voters will run back to papa,” he said.

He warned not to overestimate the power of social media. He explained that in times of crisis, Singaporeans will run back to the ruling party. “We would rather forgo time for check and balance, accountability and transparency if it means securing our bread and butter as quickly as possible,” he opined. He noted that many Singaporeans have been living on government handouts during the Circuit Breaker.

PAP has proven throughout Singapore’s history that it could craft strong policies to revive the economy during a crisis, Prof Singh said. He cited 3 instances: Lee Kuan Yew after independence, Lee Hsien Loong during the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis and Heng Swee Keat during the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. As such, he thinks that it is still likely PAP will win by a generous margin because of its track record of handling crises, despite slip-ups like Ivan Lim.

With regard to the presence of Lee Hsien Yang in this GE, who is the brother of PAP Sec-Gen Lee Hsien Loong, Prof Singh is of the opinion that Singaporeans would prefer family feud to be separated from national politics, especially it concerns the legacy of the much-loved founding PM Lee Kuan Yew.

“GE2020 will be like 2015, it will be another ‘freak election’ (for opposition), because of Covid-19. But what is more exciting to come is GE2025. It will be a referendum on the 4G leaders and not the 3G leaders… the PAP will have to prove themselves (by then),” Prof Singh said.

PAP will win big for GE2020, says managing editor of online lifestyle publication

Managing editor and co-founder of online lifestyle publication Asia 361, Katherine Goh, wrote an article that was published on Alvinology.com saying that PAP will win big this time (‘Statistics Don’t Lie – Why The PAP Will Win Big For GE2020‘, 1 Jul).

“Statistics don’t lie,” the article said.

“For this reason alone, one can boldly predict the People’s Action Party (PAP) will win BIG for the Singapore General Elections 2020 (GE2020). In fact, they may even make a clean sweep, taking back the previously Workers’ Party (WP)-held wards of Hougang Single Member Constituency (SMC) and Aljunied Group Representation Constituency (GRC).”

The article said that it has been empirically proven that voters will lean towards the incumbent ruling party in times of crisis. “There is no worse crisis than the current COVID-19 pandemic-turned-economic-recession, which is definitely in PAP’s favour,” it added.

It went on to quote the example of South Korean President Moon Jae-in, whose ruling coalition scored the largest parliamentary election victory in South Korea recently.

“President Moon’s approval rating shot up from 42% to 57% during the COVID-19 crisis — a considerable difference of 15%. Again, add this difference to PAP’s popular vote in GE2011 and GE2015. The results are 75.1% and 84.9% respectively.”

“Even if you were to take the best performing opposite ward, Hougang SMC and add on a 15% swing to PAP, they go from 42.3% in GE2015 and 37.9% in GE2011 to 57.3% and 52.9% respectively.”

“Sorry to burst the bubbles of all the opposition supporters. The PAP is going to win big in the election and it is likely even Hougang will be wiped out.”

In any case, if these experts are right, PAP Sec-Gen Lee Hsien Loong will be able to do what former PM Goh Chok Tong couldn’t do previously – to attain a clean sweep with zero opposition in Parliament. Mr Lee himself will have achieved the same as what his father did in the 60s and 70s, a 100 per cent domination of the Parliament – a world’s first among all the first world countries in the globe.

Subscribe
Notify of
30 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

1,100 foreigners vs 900 S’poreans took up senior roles in banking sector last 5 yrs

In Parliament yesterday (1 Sep), Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung insisted that…

津贴、保险后医药费仍高 网友忧福利跟不上医疗通膨

一名网友分享友人郑瑞豪(译音)的住院经历,感叹老百姓虽然花钱买保险、还公积金保健储蓄(Medisave),然而真正需要时,获得赔偿额仍难以应付日益高涨的医药费。此事引起网民纷纷留言热议,认识到现有医疗津贴制和保险的局限。 该名网友以此事为例,认为在重度残障情况下,终身护保每月只赔600新元仍有不足,即使无病无痛,最后仍难以索回保费。特别是未来医疗费逐年调涨,我们的公积金、终身健保是否能减轻我们的负担? 郑瑞豪在2018年二月26日,突发心脏病和心脏骤停,在陈笃生医院接受治疗。有两天必须躺在加护病房,随后三天转到普通病房,并接受了气球血管扩张手术(PCI)和植入支架。 他说,政府只津贴1万4000元,终身健保则津贴了1万元,然而自己仅能从公积金保健储蓄(Medisave)提取4千073元,扣了上述数额,自己仍必须承担约1万3千元的医药费。 郑瑞豪在帖文中叹,自己的医药费并没有获得政府津贴65巴仙,医疗储蓄至少有5万2千积蓄,但在当下生死关头,却无用武之地。 一名网友还质疑此贴文的真伪,因为我国公民享用政府医院服务,不论住C级病房或手术,理应至少能得65巴仙津贴,不过郑瑞豪亲自解释,也将当时的医疗收据上载,给众网友评评理:他确确实实为整个治疗服了1万3千余元的医疗费。 郑瑞豪说,完整收据有6页,问题关键不在于每个单一事项,是否获65巴仙津贴,而是在总数额,能够获得多少津贴。“C级病房也没有电视、个人卫生用品和冷气等,我还要请家人带我的个人餐具和杯子。可是一晚住宿在津贴后,仍要价212元,即便是五星级酒店都没那么贵!” 网民Kumar则分享时事评论家Andrew Loh在2016年的境遇:接受血管造影侦测,和诊断是否适合进行血管扩张手术,医药费达1万0727新元。这笔费用或政府津贴6千767.90新元(约65巴仙),终身健保偿还720元,再扣除部分保健储蓄,Andrew先生只需付2千248新元。 至于Andrew的另一心脏绕道手术要价2万5千554新元,政府津贴高达80巴仙即2万0664元;Andrew再用终身健保偿还4千909元,剩余的380元只需用保健储蓄偿还,他根本不需再自掏腰包出一分钱。 (CGH=樟宜中央医院;KTPH=邱德拔医院;NHC=国家心脏中心;NTFGH=黄廷芳综合医院;NUH=国立大学医院;TTSH=陈笃生医院。图源来自卫生部官网) 政府提供基础安全网…

Political parties share their National Day messages

Following Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s traditional National Day Message, political parties…

无可避免的办公室流言:四成员工无意中得知同事薪水

供稿来源:卡巴斯基实验室(Kaspersky Lab) 俗话说,“数据就是金钱”。有时候确实如此——例如有人碰巧看到一张记录同事薪水的试算表格(spreadsheet)。 根据卡巴斯基实验室近期进行的民调,几乎四成(37巴仙)的员工,都承认在无意间发现有关他们同事的机密信息,例如工资和奖金。 工资单明细(Payroll details),也只是存储在企业服务器上敏感个人数据的其中一种。如在安全和访问权限的防范做得不足导致数据泄露,不仅会破坏团队精神,还可能导致更为严重的后果:网络攻击、因保护个资不力惨遭罚款,甚至被受影响的员工起诉。 个人工作文件容易被未经授权人士登入访问,其中一个可能因素是,仅不到一半(43巴仙)的员工会定期检查,以及修改共享文档或协作企划的访问权限。 应定期检查访问权限 当有人离职或调入同一个公司的另一个部门时,他们的访问权限应当立刻被取消。否则,将会给组织及有关岗位的同事带来风险。 这些情况是一种更大问题的一部分,称为“数码杂乱”(digital clutter)。数字杂乱指的没有经过妥善预防措施保存的工作文件,被不受控制地散布和共享。 缺乏有效的规章和政策来管理数据,可能会导致员工对公司内外的文件流动的责任感到模糊和普遍不关心。…