The Nomination Day on Tuesday (30 June) saw the revelation of a surprise face-off in East Coast Group Representation Constituency (GRC), a battle between former Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat – from the People’s Action Party (PAP) – and Nicole Seah, who has made a comeback as a member of the Workers’ Party (WP).

Apart from Ms Seah, the WP team includes Kenneth Foo, Dylan Ng, Terence Tan, and Abdul Shariff Aboo Kassim. They will be up against the PAP team comprises Mr Heng, Maliki Osman, Cheryl Chan, Jessica Tan, and new face Tan Kiat How.

While many were curious on the reason behind Mr Heng’s decision to leave Tampines GRC – where he has been the MP since 2011 – and move to contest in East Coast GRC, others were trying to “grasp” his speech on Nomination Day proceedings.

During his speech, the PAP’s First Assistant Secretary-General seems to have mentioned “East Coast” incessantly.

“For our East Coast residents, we also have a plan for the East Coast. We have a… East Coast… Singapore… we have it together… an East Coast plan. We care at East Coast,” said Mr Heng.

He continued, “So we look forward to working closely together, with our residents … to endeavour the East Coast and the whole of Singapore to emerge from this stronger.”

Many netizens penned their comments on the video of his speech – which was posted on TOC Facebook page – noting that all they heard from Mr Heng – who is tipped to be the next Prime Minister – was “East Coast”.

 

Meanwhile, some netizens theorised that Mr Heng’s decision to move to East Coast GRC was made in the last minute, which explained why his speech seems unprepared.

Heng Swee Keat says he decided to move to East Coast GRC as it cannot afford a ‘succession gap’

As for Mr Heng’s decision to move to East Coast GRC, he shared on Facebook yesterday that the constituency cannot afford a “succession gap” in such uncertain times thus the decision was made.

In his post, he noted that he had discussed the move with PAP’s Secretary-General Lee Hsien Loong.

“The question was: should I move to East Coast? I thought long and hard about it. After serving for almost a decade, I am very attached to Tampines and the people there,” said Mr Heng.

Noting that the PAP has fielded a “very good team” in Tampines GRC, he stated that he has a strong successor in former Senior Minister for State Trade and Industry Koh Poh Koon, who has moved over from Ang Mo Kio GRC.

“If I move, I can do my part in East Coast,” Mr Heng remarked. “We cannot afford a gap in East Coast in these uncertain times. We need a full team that can take care of the residents and position them to come out of this crisis stronger than before.”

“Our team looks forward to working together with our residents, to get through this crisis safely, to continue to build the East Coast spirit of care and support for one another, and to emerge stronger,” he added.

Subscribe
Notify of
29 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

议员身兼二职 客户和公众利益,孰轻孰重?

在本月升任律政部兼卫生部高级政务部长的唐振辉,认为过去分身担任城市丰收教会案辩护律师,并没有造成任何利益冲突。 唐振辉受理城市丰收教会失信案期间,担任政府国会内政及律政委员会副主席。他在该案为该教会创会牧师康希辩护。 他在接受亚洲新闻台专访时透露, 他理解担任该失信案辩方律师然他招来很多负评,被抨击这不是人民行动党议员所为,“但我不会道歉,重来一次我还是会做同样决定。这是我的工作,有人把案子带到律师楼,要我受理。” 他说,律政部长尚穆根,也强调宪法保障任何人都有权在法律面前选择自己的辩护者。如果律师因为被批评而不敢为受害者请命,那么我们的法治精神是匮乏的。 他补充,难道身为行动党议员,就不能作为律师为嫌犯辩护?那么身为医生的议员是否就不能为嫌犯治病? 去年4月,高庭三司在二对一的情况下,用刑事法典第406条文,以较轻的失信罪惩罚丰收教会案的失信者。今年初,最高法院上诉庭也维持原判,没有接受控方要求,加重康希和五名副手的罪刑。 上诉庭解读,“代理”应为职业代理,即保险经纪和房地产经纪等,不包括公司董事。 唐振辉担任康希辩方律师。他在专访中辩解,有关条文多年不曾修改,已不合时宜,存在缺陷。他指出丰收教会领导并不属“专业代理”,以409条文对付康希并不恰当,法律规定刑罚是根据被告的层次而定。 “我很庆幸我能够把道德情感从我的专业态度中区分出来。作为律师我陈述眼前的事实。” 是议员又是辩方律师 尚穆根在今年2月曾表示,有关刑罚太轻,考虑在国会讨论,提高高级职员失信的刑罚。…

6th death from COVID-19 infection confirmed by MOH; 88-yr-old patient was admitted on 30 March

The Ministry of Health (MOH) has confirmed that a patient has passed…

TOC Reader: Keep religious values and decorum of Thaipusam

The following is a letter sent to TOC by one of our…