CORRECTION NOTICE:
This article contains a false statement of fact. For the correct facts, click here: www.gov.sg/article/factually-corrections-on-falsehoods-on-annual-salary-of-temasek-holdings-ceo-ho-ching.

In a Taiwan news show recently, it was reported that Mdm Ho Ching, wife of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, earns about TWD2.1 billion (S$99 million) a year or about S$300,000 a day as the incumbent Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer of Temasek Holdings.

v=2684081375037574

The news anchors also noted that Singaporeans often discuss Mdm Ho’s annual salary and comment if it is too high.

This report relates back to the recent saga sparked by Mdm Ho’s Facebook post about Taiwan’s donation of face masks to Singapore where she shared a news report and included a caption that simply said, “Errr….”

The post drew flak from Taiwan netizens who found her caption confusing and ask her to explain the meaning of the post, adding that if Singapore doesn’t want the masks, it can reject the offer.

While Mdm Ho’s comment was ambiguous, Singaporeans rushed to defend her on Facebook, with allegations from a pro-PAP fanpage called Singapore Matters claiming that Taiwan had held on to Singapore’s face masks leading to shortage in Singapore.

About two days later, Mdm Ho edited her post to thank “friends and friends of friends in Taiwan” for all they have done, adding that she is “forever grateful”.

She said, “We all know we are in this together as one world – and I’m totally grateful for every one which has reached out, advised, pointed the way, and tried their best to help, sometimes successfully and sometimes not.”

“But that sincere effort and thought, regardless of success or failure, is what I will treasure forever.”

She then added, “And mistakes? Also forgiven, lah!”

She also urged people  to stop “trying to beat each other up in cyber space”, stressing that we should “beat” the virus instead and noted that the “bug” can be beaten if everybody pulls together as one an does what needs to be done.

Despite Mdm Ho’s edits to clarify her comment, netizens are still flocking to Facebook to voice their displeasure over her post.

Ho Ching’s salary is question that remains unanswered in Singapore

Now, the question of Mdm Ho’s salary is one that crops up regularly. Back in June 2018, blogger Phillip Ang speculated that it could be somewhere around $100 million a year.
Others were speculating as well, guessing at perhaps $24 million or even $1 billion.

Unfortunately, we don’t know for sure if this is true because Temasek Holdings is an exempt private company under the Singapore Companies Act. This means the company is not required to publish its audited statutory consolidated financial statements. It’s even stated on their website.

So really, there’s no way for the public to know for sure how much Temasek’s management makes.

Last year in parliament (8 May), Second Finance Minister Lawrence Wong said that the Government keeps an “arms-length relationship” with GIC and Temasek Holdings, and does not get involved in their operational decisions, such as remunerations.

Mr Wong, who is also Minister for National Development and sits on the GIC’s board of directors, was responding to Workers’ Party Member of Parliament (MP) Png Eng Huat, who asked if there is a salary cap for key management of companies like sovereign wealth fund GIC and state-owned investors Temasek Holding.

The Minister did not reveal the salaries of the top brass at the two firms, and added that instead the Government expects the Boards to hold accountable for their respective performances.

Mr Png had specifically requested for the range of total annual remuneration – which include salary, annual and performance bonuses – of the top three highest-paid executives at GIC and Temasek Holdings over the last five years.

As such, Mr Wong noted that remuneration falls on performance and industry benchmarks, and supports a “prudent risk-taking culture”. In addition, a part of the remuneration at both companies are also tied to long-term performance.

Further pushing for figures, Mr Png said, “These two entities are managing our reserves, and the Government is the sole shareholder. Usually shareholders would know the remuneration packages for the companies they own.”

Despite the push, Mr Wong still refused to divulge the figure and said that there’s a system that is presented to determine compensation. Based on the past performances of these two entities, it shows that the system works, he added.

The system does not solely look at “one or two expense items” like remuneration. Instead, it comprises of a “thorough assessment” to decide long-term expected return, which will then be proposed to the President who will conduct an independent assessment with the help of advisors.

Subscribe
Notify of
50 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

District Judge says prosecution’s submission on Karl Liew’s sentencing reads like mitigation

Karl Liew, the son of former Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong, was sentenced to two weeks in jail for providing false evidence during the trial of Ms Parti Liyani, a migrant domestic worker who was initially convicted of stealing items worth S$50,856 belonging to Liew Mun Leong and his family — out of which S$46,856 worth of items were declared to have been stolen by Karl. Karl was charged for falsely claiming that two pieces of clothing found in Parti’s possession belonged to him and making a false statement to a police officer that he had discovered 119 pieces of clothing belonging to him in boxes packed by Parti. DJ Teo noted that his judgement would be limited to the two charges bought before him as the prosecution has focused only on a small segment of Karl’s testimony at the hearing in State Court and charged Karl Liew for having knowingly offered up false evidence in court in respect of that small segment. The sentencing judge noted that Karl’s false testimony could have resulted in a wrongful conviction of Parti and emphasized the importance of upholding the integrity of the justice system. The judge also observed that the prosecution’s submission read like mitigation for the accused, which the defense copied wholesale. The prosecution had sought the maximum fine of S$5,000, but the judge ruled that imprisonment was necessary for such cases. With remission, Karl is expected to serve nine days out of the two weeks in jail.

Mr Shanmugam sacrificed by earning ‘at least S$100 million lesser’ since entering politics, claims former MP Lee Bee Wah

Former People’s Action Party MP Lee Bee Wah staunchly defended Minister K Shanmugam by saying he made sacrifices to serve the people, by earning “at least S$100 million lesser’ since entering politics. She asserted in a Facebook video that he was facing unjust criticism regarding the rental of the state-owned black-and-white bungalows which he rented out from Singapore Land Authority Furthermore, she firmly believes that the Ridoutgate issue was “waste the time of our national leaders” for discussion in Parliament.

Heartwarming moment between man and little girl watching ‘Tom & Jerry’ together on MRT

A video recently emerged showing an MRT commuter sharing his phone with…

Singapore Police investigating condominium resident for berating security officer over parking dispute

A resident of Thomson Grand condominium in Singapore was caught on camera berating a security guard after the guard wheel-clamped the resident’s BMW for parking violation. The resident, who repeatedly demanded that the guard unclamp his car while pointing and cursing at him, boasted about owning more than two units in the condominium. The Union of Security Employees condemned the incident and vowed to assist the senior security supervisor and operations manager in reporting the matter to the police. In December 2021, a survey showed that about four in 10 of the 1,002 officers surveyed continued to see various forms of abuse at work.