Although Singapore supports the intent of a new global pact against violence and harassment in the workplace, it abstained from voting for it during a United Nations agency’s annual conference in June due to “concerns about overreach”, said Manpower Minister Josephine Teo.
“This would expand workplace safety and health well beyond the workplace remit,” said Mrs Teo, while speaking in Parliament on Monday (5 August). She said this in response to parliamentary questions raised on why Singapore abstained from voting.
For those who’re unaware, the new convention, which has been adopted by the International Labour Organization (ILO), tabled measures like including domestic violence in workplace risk assessments.
Apart from the city-state, other countries like Russia, El Salvador, Malaysia, Paraguay and Kyrgyzstan also abstained from voting at the ILO’s annual conference of government, employers groups and workers held on 21 June.
Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Anthea Ong asked how the Singapore delegation voted, and as a reply, Mrs Teo said the Singapore National Employers Federation “had grave concerns” but voted against the treaty.
On the other hand, the National Trades Union Congress, which represented workers, voted “in favour of the convention as a mark of solidarity for the spirit behind it, knowing full well that the Government was going to vote to abstain from it”.
Mrs Teo explained that Singapore views seriously of its treaty obligations, and has a well-established policy to “only consider adopting or ratifying conventions which are in Singapore’s interests, and with which (its) laws and policies can fully comply”.
“Where we have doubts, we will continue to study the terms of the convention. In the meantime, we will make improvements to our policies and measures that are aligned with the spirit of the convention, if they also meet our objectives,” the Minister noted.
As an example, Mrs Teo referred to the ILO’s Occupational Safety and Health Convention. She said that before ratifying the international agreement in June, the city-state had taken steps to strengthen measures and successfully reduced its workplace fatality rate.
Although Singapore chose to abstain from voting for the new treaty, it still voted to support a non-legally binding ILO recommendation accompanying the convention “as it is aligned with (Singapore’s) commitment to eliminate workplace violence and harassment”.
“We continue to partner the ILO to promote decent work and have put in place practical measures to eliminate workplace violence and harassment,” she noted.
For instance, “practical measures” are already in place, like how employers must follow the Tripartite Guidelines on Fair Employment Practices which includes grievance handling.
Apart from that, employers are also expected to respond quickly to affected individuals and conduct proper investigations into complaints. Data is also gathered through complaints that the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) receives yearly, said Mrs Teo.
TAFEP will raise cases to government agencies and partners, as well as the police and the courts, where appropriate.
As of now, only “a very small percentage” of these gathered complaints come from workplace harassment.
“This is not to trivialise the concerns of those who did file the complaints, but in general, we do not have a pervasive issue. It is quite specific to certain employers and certain types of work arrangements. Those we will follow up,” she pointed out.
Serious cases like outrage of modesty are punishable crime under the Penal Code or can be taken up under the Protection from Harassment Act, said Mrs Teo.
Upon reading this news, many netizens expressed their anger with Singapore’s move to abstain from voting for the global treaty. Commenting on CNA’s Facebook page, they said that they’re “ashamed” of the government’s decision and pointed out that Singapore just made one step backward to be part of the other six countries which abstained from voting.
 

They also pointed out that the government is “trying to protect companies from getting scrutinized over such cases”, causing them to opt out from voting for the global pact. “The pack is to protect employees. Teo made it clear her ears are instead with employers,” said Facebook user Leandro Ngo.

However, Praisie Huang said that the reason Singapore abstained from voting is not because the government don’t see the importance of workplace safety, but rather because “the treaty involved issues like domestic violence which would mean the workplace has to get involved with people’s domestic life which is the overreaching part”.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

AGC potentially overlooking possible sub judice contempt by pro-PAP Facebook fanpage regarding ongoing WP MPs’ trial

Amidst the controversy surrounding the ongoing trial of three Workers’ Party (WP)…

The state of our buses – LTA should do more

I refer to the report,  “Only one case of non-compliance” (TODAY April…

两车相撞毁大厦外墙! 所幸两名司机仅轻伤

今日(6日)上午,莱佛士广场地铁站的AIA大厦外发生骇人车祸,两辆轿车相撞并撞毁大厦墙壁,墙瓦脱落,其中一辆车子更是侧翻,场面如同动作电影场景。 所幸两名司机均属轻伤,62岁德士司机在意识清醒下被送往新加坡中央医院,而另为男性司机则被现场医护人员救治,惟拒绝进一步到医院接受治疗。 该起车祸发生在今早10点前,车祸发生后,立即被路人拍摄下来上传至网络,迅速引起网民疯传。 从照片上可见,一辆蓝色相信是德士的轿车与银色的私家车撞上,德士内已弹出安全气囊,而银色车子侧翻,救难人员需从车子的另一边将受害者救出。 此外,大厦的状况也可见损毁不少,墙瓦脱落,可见当时冲击力不小,但目测并未伤及大厦的主要架构。 警方表示,事故仍在侦办中。 网友EstherTan :我的天啊!我希望他们都能够平安,AIA大厦要再次检查,万一内部有裂痕呢 部分网民则形容整个场景如同香港电影般刺激,有些人更称像是看了一场成龙的电影 网友Eric Chia :很赞的场景,好像那些香港电视剧…

GE is about us, our future: Chen Show Mao

Ko Siew Huey / The Worker’s Party (WP) introduced its final slate…