The legal battle between Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and veteran blogger Leong Sze Hian continues as PM Lee wrote in his affidavit dated 11 February that the article that the blogger shared on his Facebook page was a personal attack and an attack on the government of Singapore.

In November 2018, PM Lee sued the renowned Singaporean blogger for defamation over a Facebook share he made on his Facebook profile with an article from TheCoverage.My. The article claimed that editor-in-chief of investigative journalism platform Sarawak Report (SR) Ms Clare Rewcastle had mentioned Singapore as “one of the key investigation targets, alongside Switzerland and United States” in the 1MDB scandal during an interview with Malaysian media.

In his affidavit, PM Lee affirmed that he was defamed on a personal and professional level.

He wrote, “The article falsely alleged that I had become a key target of the investigations into 1MDB, that Mr Najib had signed several ‘unfair agreements’ with me, in exchange for assistance by Singapore banks to launder 1MDB’s billions, and that I am corrupt. That was an attack against me personally as well as against the Singapore government, of which I am the head.”

The affidavit statements were filed in response to the counterclaim filed by Mr Leong after he was sued by PM Lee last year. In his counterclaim, the blogger argued that the lawsuit was an “abuse of the process of the court”.

As such, Mr Leong, represented by lawyer and opposition party leader Lim Tean, is filling to strike out the entire lawsuit. However, Mr Lee, who is being represented by Senior Counsel Davinder Singh, is applying to strike down Mr Leong’s counterclaim.

On Monday (25 February), a close-door hearing of the two’s strike down applications, which lasted more than three hours, took place in the High Court.

Justice Aedit Abdullah reserved his judgment and will deliver a written judgement at a later, unspecified date.

After articles of PM Lee’s affidavit statements were published on Channel NewsAsia, TODAYonline and Mothership, many netizens question the need for PM Lee to single out Mr Leong and sue him for a just sharing an article.

Over 300 comments were received in these news sites’ Facebook pages.

Some even wrote that PM Lee should sue the original creator of the article and not Mr Leong, and he should also accept criticism if it comes his way.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

India’s Finance Minister praises RBI in allowing DBS to rescue failed Chennai bank

In an interview with Bloomberg on Tues (8 Dec), India’s Finance Minister…

“反对党团结仍是一大挑战” 毕丹星对吴明盛隔空喊话?

“我们的目的不是要摧毁政治对手,而是远高于此:追求全体国人更好的新加坡。而工人党处理反对党政治的方式就反映这点。” 工人党秘书长毕丹星回溯2013年榜鹅东补选,工人党前秘书长刘程强曾指“道不同不相为谋”,感叹促成反对党团结的困难。 毕丹星在脸书发文,分享一则来自《亚洲新闻台》的报导,内容是蓝彬明指责某反对党成员在与送餐员对话会上的做法“不负责任”。 毕丹星先是在帖文中称,不同政党和个人都有不同的理念,工人党的基本信念则是,不论政府谁当家,反对党都是议会民主的一部分,扮演重要的制衡角色。 故此,他解释该党目的不是要摧毁对手,而是让国人的新加坡更美好;他也相信国人乃至他们致力合理说服的行动党支持者,都认同“忠实反对党”这种处理方式。但他坦言并非所有反对党都有同一信念。 针对近期的电动滑板车禁令禁令风波,他先是说明自己和费沙议员,曾前往探访因被改装电动滑板车撞上而不幸身亡的王女士家属,以及那些反映因PMD事故受伤的居民,也提到孩童安全的隐忧。 他也阐述本身对电动滑板车禁令,以及送餐员生计倍影响的观点,认为送餐服务特别是为低收入者提供工作机会,让他们得以养活家庭,也是正当的职业。他相信调整政策后个人代步工具仍能重新回归,但在提升基础设施上恐怕知易行难。 他指工人党作为本土政治版图的“小角色”之一,应明确本身的政治目的,也指在更大程度上也解释尽管有良好友善的讨论和关系,反对党团结仍是一大挑战。 吴明盛反驳蓝彬明:打破7千人饭碗才严重 虽然毕丹星未点名,不过他的言论似乎是针对此前盛港西单选区议员蓝彬明,在脸书抱怨有反对党成员在与送餐员的对话会上,把课题政治化。 蓝彬明在本月12日于选区与送餐员对话,他在帖文中指有关反对党成员将问题政治化和炒作在场人士情绪,认为“这是不负责任和可憎的。”,并指这么做对任何人都没有帮助,也在此时理应协助送餐员群体的当儿分散注意力。 吴明盛稍早前则在脸书录视频反驳自己没政治化议题,反指“人们的温饱是政治,饭碗是政治,当你打破7千人的饭碗,那才是严峻的政治状况。”他也质疑让送餐员改用其他代步工具是否能解决问题。…

马哈迪警告 不排除对付在国外引起烟霾马国公司

马来西亚首相马哈迪警告,那些在国外引发烟霾的大马公司须负上责任,包括采取行动扑灭林火,否则马国政府不排除将立法对付他们。 马哈迪在昨日的新闻发布会上透露,若发现这些公司不愿采取行动,可能会寻求在国会通过法律,要他们负起责任。 他认为,即使这些马国公司资产在外国,但也应对自己的产业着火负责。 上周五,印尼环保与林业部长茜蒂努尔峇雅,透露该国已封锁超过30个被指涉及烧芭的种植公司,包括森那美种植集团的子公司Sime Indo Agro、IOI集团的子公司Sukses Karya Sawit 、嘉隆发展集团的子公司Rafi Kamajaya Abadi,以及吉隆坡甲洞的子公司Adei Plantation…

170,000 more trees will be planted in industrial estates by 2030, says National Development Minister Desmond Lee

The Singapore Government has set a goal to plant 170,000 more trees…