Last Wed (16 Jan), a member of the public, Albert Tang, wrote to ST Forum asking why SP Group didn’t offer the heavily discounted electricity rates, which many of the electricity retailers are currently offering to the public, in the first place.

“Given that electricity retailers are looking to make a profit, have spent a significant amount on marketing costs and are still able to offer consumers electricity rates that are a good 20 to 30 per cent lower than SP Group’s, why doesn’t SP Group just offer consumers these lower rates in the first place?” he asked.

Indeed, according to, one can get a fixed discount of as much as 25% off the regulated tariff from SP Group for floating rates. For fixed price plans, it can be even higher at 30% discount.

Mr Tang continued, “Many of the 13 or so retailers participating in the OEM do not generate their own power, instead claiming to buy in bulk from power plants to sell to consumers. As the largest bulk buyer of electricity, SP Group should benefit the most from economies of scale, and be able to pass the savings on to consumers.”

“It is hard to understand the logic behind creating the OEM and getting so many retailers to compete for consumers, when SP Group is in a position to bypass this step to sell electricity directly to consumers at more competitive rates,” he added.

Indeed, many netizens are also wondering if SP Group has overcharged the public all this while.

EMA: Current lower prices offered by retailers due to electricity production capacity exceeds demand

In response to Mr Tang’s letter, Ms Dorcas Tan, Director of Market Development and Surveillance Department of the Energy Market Authority (EMA), replied on ST Forum today (‘Why electricity retailers’ rates are better‘,23 Jan).

She said that the regulated tariff, charged by SP Group and approved by EMA, reflects the “long-term costs of producing and delivering electricity in Singapore”.

Such long-term costs include the costs of building and operating the power plants and maintaining the power grid, she added.

“On the other hand, the electricity rates offered by retailers typically reflect the current market conditions, level of competition and short-term costs of producing electricity,” she said.

“Under current market conditions where electricity production capacity exceeds demand for electricity, we can expect market prices to be lower than the regulated tariff. However, this may change over time based on market demand and supply.”

That is to say, the current low prices offered by the electricity retailers are due to over-capacity supplied from SP Group.

But she cautioned that retailers, like all businesses, may adjust their prices and discounts over time.

So, the question remains, if SP Group — which is owned by Temasek — has been over-generating electricity all these while, why didn’t it lower the electricity tariff for Singaporeans in the first place, instead of allowing them to suffer with the high cost of living in Singapore for the last many years?

Indeed, according to blogger Philip Ang after he combed through every SP Group’s annual report since 2005, he has discovered that SP Group has been making an average of almost S$1 billion for some 13 years. From 2005 to 2017, its annual net profit averaged almost S$1 billion.

Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

超标化学物质污水倒入下水道! 威记食品被罚1万7700元

公用事业局指出,一家本地食品制造商多次将超标的化学物质倒入公共下水道内,因此对它开出1万7700元的罚单。 当局于今日(10月8日)发文告指出,当局于去年9月到10月期间,到威记食品位于大成道的厂房进行稽查时,发现他们将含有化学物质的污水倒入下水道内。污水内的化学含量超标了120倍以上,也好有超标八倍以上的油渍。 该公司因此面对四项排放含超标化学物质污水的控状,还有六项控状在下判时被纳入考量中。 据文告指出,威记食品并非首次违法,该公司于起2019年5月也因类似罪行而被定罪,被罚款了1万4400元。 当局指出,下水道若出现化学物质超标或油渍含量超标的情况,会影响水的处理过程,进而导致新生水的生产被破坏。 为了保护下水道和排水系统等,当局自今年5月4日起,就不再批准威记食品将污水倒入下水道,并要求该公司聘请废料收集公司进行废料处理。

Netizens furious at AVA for showing no sympathy to the man who was bitten by a snake in the case of mishandling the reptile

Netizens are furious at Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) for…


卫生部表示,一名感染新型冠状性病毒的患者,已经康复出院。 据卫生部周二(4日)表示,该名病患为35岁中国武汉男子,是本地第七起确诊病例,经过全面检测后,均呈现阴性,达到了出院标准。 对此,卫生部召开记者会表明,“我们今日(4日)有一名病患出院,经治疗后已无出现相关症状,他同时也连续接受了三天的检查,其检测结果均呈阴性,因此,确认他不会再有感染的风险。” 据了解,该名病患于1月23日抵达我国,隔日出现新型冠状性病毒相关症状,被送往莱佛士医院接受治疗,随后被转介至国家传染病中心(NCID),于1月27日确诊。 卫生部也指出,医生也将会持续密切留意病患的情况,同时也补充道,另一名病人也出现好转现象,正准备在未来几天内出院。 该部表示,目前仍无法全面确定,因为医生仍需每日检查病人的状况,但也有部分病人的状况已逐渐出现好转,至少三名患者已无出现相关症状;另五名患者则必须仰赖呼吸器协助呼吸,卫生部表示,这是因为他们有出现肺炎症状。 公立医院内所有肺炎患者均需接受新型冠状性病毒检测 与此同时,卫生部也表示,自上周以来,公立医院内所有肺炎患者均需接受新型冠状性病毒检测,而且在同日,亦检查出六起确诊病例。 其中包括其中有四名病患近期内都没有到过中国,包括一名印度尼西亚籍女佣. 针对我国是否有能力检测大量肺炎患者,卫生部医药服务副总监麦锡威教授指出,肺炎已成为新加坡第二大死因,占我国死亡人数的五分之一以上,每周大约会有500至600名肺炎患者需要接受病毒检测,因此不必担心检测的能力。 此外,根据《海峡时报》报道,除了公立医院,私家私人医院也将会对肺炎病患进行病毒检测。