Connect with us

Uncategorized

Screaming xenophobia no more?

Published

on

By Andrew Loh

 

Have you noticed that “xenophobia” seems to have disappeared into thin air in Singapore?low refutes xenophobia

On 31 March this year, Straits Times reporter Tessa Wong wrote a piece for the paper on what she perceived to be the then prevailing xenophobic online postings among some members of the public.

Her article, titled “Zero tolerance for intolerance”, was an attack on those who had spoken up against the Government’s immigration, labour and population policies.

“[The] pushback against xenophobia is still nowhere close to gaining steam,” she lamented.

“These days, they are more likely to spout phrases such as ‘Singaporeans first’ and champion the rights of ‘born and bred Singaporeans’,” Ms Wong wrote, referring to those she saw as xenophobic.

She went on:

“Xenophobes never like to be called xenophobes; instead they prefer the friendlier and more patriotic-sounding term ‘pro-Singaporeans’.

“Those who indulge in this masquerade should be called out, as this behaviour seeks to protect Singaporeans’ interests and identity using a negative ‘us versus them’ mentality.”

She urged:

“Singaporeans should speak out against xenophobia even if it’s currently the unpopular thing to do.”

And:

“The truth is there can be no justification for hating another person for being a foreigner, and this kind of discriminatory behaviour should never be allowed to take root in a Singapore that has always been open and tolerant of many faiths and races.

“This is a message that needs to be reinforced over and over again, no matter the political climate, no matter how unpopular the message may be, by citizens and leaders alike.”

Strong words indeed.

Ms Wong was no doubt echoing the government’s angst of criticisms of its immigration policy from Singaporeans. She, quite obviously, had jumped on the bandwagon to paint every criticism and critique of such policies as “xenophobia”.

I’d written a rebuttal to her article here: “Screaming xenophobia”.

Fast forward six months to 30 September and this was the headline in the TODAY newspaper:

tsf

Rewind to Ms Wong’s words:

“These days, they are more likely to spout phrases such as ‘Singaporeans first’ and champion the rights of ‘born and bred Singaporeans’.”

What shall we then say about Speaker of Parliament Mdm Halimah Yaacob’s comment?

3 weeks ago, the Ministry of Manpower introduced its “Fair Consideration Framework” to urge employers to “hire locals before foreigners”. In effect, this is – for all intent and purposes – a “Hire Singaporeans First” policy, although the Manpower Minister denies it is.

"... hire locals before foreigners..."

“… hire locals before foreigners…”

It is suddenly alright to be “pro-Singaporeans”, or to promote “Singaporeans First”.

What changed?

My guess is that the Government has finally realised that what Singaporeans, including its online critics, were saying was not untrue. That, in fact, employers do discriminate against Singaporean workers when it comes to employment, and that a sizeable segment of our workforce, the PMETs, are at the forefront of this, as indeed many have been trying to tell the government for several years now.

Mdm Halimah’s remarks are the latest proof that the Government has finally come round to openly accept that Singaporeans should have priority when it comes to jobs and urge employers to “think Singaporeans first.”

The discrimination which PMETs faced at the workplace has become a political issue which could threaten to reduce the ruling party’s share of the votes at the next election. So, it had to act, otherwise it will not have time to, before the next hustings due by 2016.

The point I am trying to put across is this: reporters and journalists should spend more time thinking things through before jumping on the convenient bandwagon to be the loudspeakers of a government which many see as out-of-touch. Even former head of the Civil Service recently criticised the PAP government for lacking empathy, being elitist and that the party “don’t feel for the people”.

Don’t become cheerleaders of the establishment just because it is the convenient thing to do.

You risk becoming purveyors of witch hunts against those who genuinely care about our society.

It has happened in the past, such as in 1987.

It happened recently with regards to the Indonesian haze episode.

The screams and cries of “xenophobia!” perpetuated by the mainstream media and the likes of Ms Wong threaten to bury and shame into silence the genuine concerns of Singaporeans.

But if those like Ms Wong feel that promoting a “Singaporeans First” idea is xenophobic, then let them speak up against Mdm Halimah and the Ministry of Manpower for, as Ms Wong herself wrote so eloquently:

“This is a message that needs to be reinforced over and over again, no matter the political climate, no matter how unpopular the message may be, by citizens and leaders alike.”

“Singaporeans should speak out against xenophobia even if it’s currently the unpopular thing to do.”

Unless, of course, it is not xenophobia to speak up for Singaporeans – which it is not.

Incidentally, it is worth noting that such accusations of ‘xenophobia’ died down after the MDA introduced its new set of Internet regulations in July.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Indonesia

Miss Universe cuts ties with Indonesia chapter after harassment allegations

The Miss Universe Organization severs ties with Indonesia franchise due to harassment claims. Malaysia edition canceled.

Women allege body checks before pageant. Investigation launched. Safety prioritized.

Indonesia winner to compete in November finale. Height requirement controversy.

Published

on

WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — The Miss Universe Organization has cut ties with its Indonesia franchise, it announced days after allegations of sexual harassment, and will cancel an upcoming Malaysia edition.

In the complaint, more than a half dozen women said all 30 finalists for Miss Universe Indonesia were unexpectedly asked to strip for a supposed body check for scars and cellulite two days before the pageant’s crowning ceremony in Jakarta.

Their lawyer said Tuesday that five of the women had their pictures taken.

“In light of what we have learned took place at Miss Universe Indonesia, it has become clear that this franchise has not lived up to our brand standards, ethics, or expectations,” the US-based Miss Universe Organization posted Saturday night on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.

It said that it had “decided to terminate the relationship with its current franchise in Indonesia, PT Capella Swastika Karya, and its National Director, Poppy Capella.”

It thanked the contestants for their bravery in coming forward and added that “providing a safe place for women” was the organization’s priority.

Jakarta police spokesman Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said Tuesday that an investigation into the women’s complaint has been launched.

The Indonesia franchise also holds the license for Miss Universe Malaysia, where there will no longer be a competition this year, according to the New York-based parent organizer.

In a lengthy statement posted to Instagram, Indonesia franchise director Capella denied involvement in any body checks.

“I, as the National Director and as the owner of the Miss Universe Indonesia license, was not involved at all and have never known, ordered, requested or allowed anyone who played a role and participated in the process of organizing Miss Universe Indonesia 2023 to commit violence or sexual harassment through body checking,” she wrote.

She added that she is against “any form of violence or sexual harassment.”

The Jakarta competition was held from 29 July to 3 August to choose Indonesia’s representative to the 2023 Miss Universe contest, and was won by Fabienne Nicole Groeneveld.

Miss Universe said it would make arrangements for her to compete in the finale, scheduled for November in El Salvador.

This year’s Indonesia pageant also came under fire for announcing a “significant change in this (year’s) competition guidelines” with the elimination of its minimum height requirement after it had crowned a winner.

In its statement, the Miss Universe Organization said it wanted to “make it extremely clear that there are no measurements such as height, weight, or body dimensions required to join a Miss Universe pageant worldwide.”

— AFP

Continue Reading

Malaysia

A Perodua service centre in Kuantan, Malaysia went viral for its strict dress code, Perodua responds

A dress code for vehicle servicing? A Malaysian car brand’s service centre dress code signage has puzzled netizens, raising queries about the need for attire rules during a routine service.

The manufacturer responded with an official statement after a flurry of comments, seeking to clarify and apologize.

Published

on

By

MALAYSIA: A dress code signage positioned at a service centre belonging to a prominent Malaysian car brand has sparked bewilderment among Malaysian netizens, who question the necessity of adhering to attire guidelines for a simple vehicle servicing.

The signage explicitly delineates clothing items that are deemed unsuitable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, abbreviated pants, and distressed jeans.

The car manufacturer swiftly found itself flooded with comments from both inquisitive and irked Malaysian netizens. This surge in online activity prompted the company to issue an official statement aimed at clarifying the situation and extending an apology.

In a post that gained significant traction on the social media platform, politician Quek Tai Seong of Pahang State, Malaysia, shared an image to Facebook on Monday (7 Aug).

The image showcased a dress code sign prominently displayed at a Perodua Service Centre in Kuantan. Within the post, Quek posed the question: “Is this dress code applicable nationwide, or is it specific to this branch?”

The signage reads, “All customers dealing with Perodua Service Kuantan 1, Semambu, are requested to dress modestly and appropriately.”

Adding visual clarity to these guidelines, the sign features illustrative graphics that explicitly outline clothing items deemed unacceptable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, short pants, and ripped jeans.

Delineating the specifics of the dress code, the signage stipulates that male visitors are expected to don shirts accompanied by neckties, opt for long pants, and wear closed shoes.

Conversely, female visitors are advised to don long-sleeved shirts, full-length skirts, and closed-toe footwear.

Perodua’s dress code sparks online uproar

Following the rapid spread of the post, Perodua’s official Facebook page found itself inundated with comments from both intrigued and frustrated Malaysian netizens, all seeking clarifications about the newly surfaced dress code policy.

Amidst the flurry of comments, numerous incensed netizens posed pointed questions such as, “What is the rationale behind the introduction of such regulations by the management? We demand an explanation.”

Another netizen expressed their dissatisfaction, arguing against the necessity of the rule and urging Perodua to take inspiration from the practices of other 4S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts, and Survey) automotive dealerships.

A concerned Facebook user chimed in, advocating for a more lenient stance, asserting that attempting to dictate customers’ clothing choices might not be in the company’s best interest.

Someone also commented in an angry tone, “Oi what is this? Going there for car service, not interview or working, right.”

As the discourse unfolded, it became evident that while some inquiries carried genuine weight, others chose to inject humor into the situation, playfully remarking, “If I wanted to buy a Myvi, I should buy or rent a formal attire first.”

“I sell economy rice at a hawker centre, I have never worn a long sleeve shirt and a tie… I guess I will not buy a Perodua car then.”

“I guess they will not serve those who wear short pants.”

Perodua addresses dress code controversy

As reported by Chinese media outlet Sin Chew Daily News, the manager of Kuantan’s Perodua Service Centre had acknowledged that the images on the dress code signage were misleading.

In response, the manager divulged that discussions had transpired with the head office, leading to the prompt removal of the signage to prevent any further misconceptions.

The manager clarifies, “We do encourage visitors to adhere to the dress etiquette, but we won’t go to the extent of restricting their choice of attire.”

He also revealed that currently, no complaints have been directly received from the public.

However, feedback from certain customers was relayed through Perodua’s agents.

Perodua also released an official statement by chief operating officer JK Rozman Jaffar on Wednesday (9 Aug) regarding the dress code on their official Facebook page.

The statement stated the dress code etiquette is not aligned with their official guidelines and they are currently conducting an official investigation on the matter followed by corrective measures to avoid the same incident from happening.

Perodua also extends its apologies for any inconvenience caused.

 

Continue Reading

Trending