by: Shawn Danker/

Sunday, June 5th 2011. Most Singaporeans awoke to be greeted by heavy downpour that they thought was great weather for sleeping in. Tenants in the Tanglin area of Orchard Road faced a very different scenario. Tanglin Mall, Forum Galleria, the St Regis residences and several other areas of the island were hit by flash flooding with mostly no advance warning given. The PUB blamed a technical glitch that prevented the flood warning from reaching the tenants of Tanglin Mall and St Regis residences as they were inundated that morning. The question that begs to be asked from this matter is: Even if the flood warning had worked as intended, would it have made a difference to the people affected in Orchard Road?

Let me paint for you a picture of what could have happened that morning: The flood levels along that stretch of Orchard Road rose fast, thanks to the ongoing downpour and inadequate drainage. An early warning alarm would have mostly benefited the residents of St Regis who could hop into their cars and drive towards higher ground. The tenants of affected malls would not be so lucky as there would be no time or even the means to move their inventory, let alone sandbag their mall in an attempt to prevent the water from breaching the premises. One uninsured private vendor from Tanglin Mall remarked, “Her instinct would be to grab her products and run.” A building that was flood free for over 15 years, was suddenly impacted although the ‘torrent’ was nowhere near the recorded high of rainfall for the month of June (67mm vs. 378.7mm).

What are some of the consequences that arose from the flood that drenched Tanglin Mall and Forum Galleria?

Financial Losses

  • A water logged and damaged inventory is a wasted resource that has to be underwritten.
  • The time, energy and money business owners spent cleaning up after the flood resulted in missed opportunity costs and significant sales losses for small business.

Structural Damage

  • Water logged stores could suffer from some form of structural damage due to extended exposure to water. The most ‘at risk’ shops are the ones on the lower levels of the affected malls as water flows and pools at the lowest point of a structure. This results in problems such as rotting, toxic mold, and possibly eventual replacement.

Insurance Cost and Implications

  • Tanglin Mall’s Cold Storage ceiling collapsed and it was fixed in 2 days. The repairs were covered by insurance but other shop owners might not have adequate insurance to cover their repairs.
  • Since insurance was used by most of the businesses to cover the losses from their damaged inventory, premiums for the area are going to dramatically increase because the location is now deemed flood prone and a risk to insure. If the malls pay for the insurance does this mean that the management is going to increase the rent? If the tenants pay it, then their business expenses will increase. Either way it is the small business owners who suffer.

Orchard Road Business Association’s Complaint

  • ORBA is justified in slamming PUB in its failure to provide adequate advance warning of the oncoming flood. PUB should have already known that the stakes of failure were high from last year’s Orchard Road floods. It is hard to believe that PUB was caught off guard again, considering that PUB has had access to years of historical data to analyze and predict any future flooding incidents.
  • It would have been helpful to have civil engineers, in particular PUB Chief Khoo Teck Chye around to address the devastation first hand. By being the first high-ranking official to be on scene, Dr Vivien Balakrishnan became the face of the issue and his presence became a rallying point for the tenants. His appearance was certainly commendable where in contrast PUB’s absence spoke volumes about the agency taking ownership over an issue that falls under their jurisdiction.
  • What probably stings the most is the lack of any form of apology from PUB on its failure to prevent the flood, or the lack of any aid rendered aside from being told that the glitch with the warning system will be rectified and they will look into improving existing infrastructure.
  • If financial aid is out of the question, then PUB should at least pay to hire one off workers to help with the post flood clean up and disposal of damaged goods. The management of Tanglin Mall probably paid to clean up the mess in the public area of the building, but that still left the tenants basically paying for someone else’s mistake.

Does anyone think this is fair?


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

需获人力部批准信与公司复工信函 马国客工返新上班不许每日往返两地

随着新马两国疫情趋缓,边境也逐渐开放,不过据了解若马国工友要重返新加坡上班,需有新加坡人力部的批准信与公司复工的信函,而且一旦出境,就不许再每日往返新马两地。 马国柔州移民局近日上载了“马国公民返新加坡复工”的问答录,解答民众的疑惑。 当局指出,马国公民在完成14天隔离期后,欲重返新加坡工作,无论是从事重要服务领域,均需出示新加坡人力部的批准信与出示公司复工信函。 当局也强调,一旦出境,在马来西亚复苏期行动管制期间(6月10日至8月31日),也不允再度回国及每日往返两地。 马国工友欲知更多详情,可联络马国移民局办公处07-2182400(柔佛长堤),或07-5133040(马新第二通道)。 马国考虑放宽允狮城公民入境 马国国防部长沙比里表示,截至今日,属于绿区的国家是新加坡、汶莱、纽西兰与澳洲,卫生部将进一步说明绿区与红区的国家。 因此,原则上允许汶莱和我国公民入境马来西亚,但与此同时,汶莱与新加坡也必须允许马国公民入境两国。 他指出,汶莱与新加坡公民入境马国时,无需进行冠病检测和隔离,但同时,他也希望为我国与汶莱也必须同样允许我国公民入境。目前马来西亚正与我国和汶莱外交部进行商讨。 “如果两国同意放宽,马国也会同意放宽。”

Dr Chee Soon Juan’s Orange & Teal eatery doesn’t levy service charge; encourages satisfied customers to tip

Dr Chee Soon Juan’s café, Orange & Teal, does not levy the…

Singapore seeks help from Taiwan for mask supplies, according to Taiwanese media

In view of the evolving situation of COVID-19 pandemic, many health experts…

Man threatens motorist with claims of being a civil servant after confronted with illegal parking

An errant driver threatened a lady with his claim of being a…