TOC Editorial:

We all knew it was coming because we’ve seen it before: slime-slinging, full frontal personalized assaults on character are par for the course in any election. The first shot has been fired across the bows by the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP), targeted squarely at the man most likely to shake its grip on power.

Chen Show Mao is the candidate the PAP wants to recruit but cannot find: he is perfectly bilingual, has reached the commanding heights of success in the private sector, a person with a global perspective but a heart for local politics.

Most importantly, Mr Chen is willing to enter a life of public service without the “insurance” PAP candidates fielded in GRCs have. He is willing to put his neck out with little or no prospect of seeing a ministerial salary in his lifetime. He is living, breathing proof that the PAP’s model of having to pay top dollar for top talent is a fig leaf used to hide the naked reality of a party devoid of passion and conviction.

Voters will ask: if Chen Show Mao can serve the people without the promise of millions, why can’t the ministers of the PAP?

And so, in what might come across as a spasm of desperation, the PAP has resorted to ignoring the issues and playing the person. Dr Ng Eng Hen’s letter in the Straits Times Forum was page one of this playbook.

Stop the double standards

Right thinking Singaporeans would be justifiably perplexed if they sniff a whiff of hypocrisy.

The PAP has candidates in its ranks who only became citizens in the last few years. Ms Foo Mee Har had problems telling reporters when she became a Singaporean (two years ago), and has spent long periods of time working overseas. (See video here.)

Another new citizen, Mr Janil Puthucheary, never did National Service unlike Mr Chen, who had the distinction of serving as an Officer of the Singapore Armed Forces. Mr Chen served in our armed forces despite not actually being a naturalized citizen yet.

PAP leaders have appealed to the public to judge candidates like Mr Puthucheary and Ms Foo on the fact that they have chosen Singapore as their home, but now they challenge Mr Chen’s bona fides for returning home?

The Online Citizen believes that the increasingly international character of candidates is a net positive: we published an editorial praising Ms Foo for her private sector savvy and global outlook. National leaders who have always said a global outlook is necessary for Singapore’s survival should not now be tearing down Singaporeans who work overseas.

The hypocrisy must stop.

In the last week, Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng told voters to “drill down to the details” of the opposition parties’ manifestos. After the PAP released a sparsely detailed manifesto that was roundly criticized, Minister Lim Swee Say then turns up to tell Singaporeans to “not just think about the micro aspects of policies”.

In an almost tragicomedic turn of events, the PAP disabled the comments features on their Youtube video launching the manifesto. The “comments disabled” notification is now immortalized in screenshots juxtaposed against stills from the video telling Singaporeans that their “opinions matter”.

The PAP needs to take heed that continuing to confuse voters by mixing messages will boomerang on them.

If the PAP chooses to make Mr Chen’s country of business an election issue, they run a high risk of being accused of hypocrisy, as well as being willing to go into an election insulting the intelligence of the electorate.

One can only hope the PAP takes the high road, and fight this election on the merits of the candidates and the issues at stake. Singaporeans deserve no less.

———-

Read also: When a son of the land returns.

————

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

获当局提供类似餐点连续两周 客工投诉无门苦不堪言

我国政府承诺会照顾留在本地的客工,为他们提供餐点,然而有网民发现客工们有很多食物并未吃完,因此怒轰客工们不知“珍惜”,岂止客工们连续两周享用同样的食物,甚至吃出病来,又投诉无门,真真是哑巴吃黄连,有苦说不出。 基于外国客工宿舍的冠状病毒病例激增,新加已经于4月25日起将国内约25个宿舍列入公报上,并加紧努力,确保妥善照顾到宿舍客工们的需求和福祉。 人力部(MOM)于4月25日在脸书上分享了一段视频,指当局在斋戒月期间,也为穆斯林客工作出安排,让他们能够履行宗教义务。“此外,跨部门工作小组和新加坡回教宗教理事会也为居住在非专用宿舍内的客工们,分发了超过1500公斤的椰枣。” 然而,不少客工对此帖文发出评论,甚至表示他们并没有获得有关服务。 一名客工将自己的食物照片,即白米、番茄汁捞鱼和咖喱的照片传到网络公民处,声称那是兀兰北海岸客工宿舍(North Coast Lodge)的客工过去两周的餐点。该客工宿舍早前就被列为隔离区。 据可供指出,尽管他们可以从宿舍商店购买到干粮,如饼干、薯条、黄油面包和汽水,但是他们买不到新鲜食品。 曾向雇主投诉 建议自己煮食 他们也曾向雇主投诉,但是被告知雇主也无能为力。 他指出,他们曾向宿舍管理层投诉不能食用类似食物,甚至建议让他们在保持安全社交距离的情况下自己做饭,但是并没有获得相关当局的任何回应。…

卖毛巾养二残疾妹 网民纷支持摊主谢绝捐款

有网民在脸书分享,如果要买毛巾和手帕,不妨光顾牛车水大厦底层第183号摊位,因为55岁的摊主熊宝明,靠卖毛巾挣钱照顾两名残疾妹妹。 贴文提到由于牛车水大厦将在三月开始进行关闭进行装修,为期三个月,为此担忧熊宝明这段期间收入受影响,故此呼吁大家多多支持熊宝明,向他购买价格公道的毛巾,让他有更多收入度过艰难。 有关毛巾摊位原本是熊宝明的父亲熊义聪经营,后来不幸中风于10年前过世后,摊位生意就传承给熊宝明。 熊宝明的两位妹妹一出生就患有肌肉萎缩症,49岁妹妹生来哑巴又瘫痪,目前住疗养院;51岁妹妹则和哥哥同住牛车水组屋。 上述贴文发出后,迄今已累计近9千次分享,一些网民也留言表示,时常光顾熊宝明的毛巾摊,呼吁大家多多去光顾。有者甚至建议帮忙摊主在网络宣传售卖,增加生意量。 根据《联合早报》报导,民众踊跃前往拜访熊宝明,也有民众要捐钱给他,不过熊宝明再三谢谢大家的关心,也坚持只卖毛巾谢绝捐款。 他告诉记者,家里还有多个手足,他们都关心妹妹,只是大家都有工作和家庭,才由单身的他照料妹妹。

网疯传老人疑遭妻子冷对待 社会与家庭发展部展开调查

昨日本社报道,一名网友发现老人疑遭妻子冷对待,主动发文求助并恳请社会福利机构或有关当局介入。 网友在循环路市场和食阁中心(Circuit Road Market & Food Centre)发现老人便帮他购买食物并送他回家,发现老人疑似遭妻子冷对待,为了能够协助老人,网友将老人的悲惨情况发文到网上,立即引起网民的疯传。 社会与家庭发展部昨日(29日)晚间也作出回应,表示目前护联中心(AIC)也与勿洛社会服务中心(Social Service Office)积极合作,调查此案,并尽快与其家属联系提供给更多协助。 文内指出,“今天网络上疯传一篇帖文,帖文中的老人似乎面临医疗与家庭相关问题。对此,许多网民也表达对老人的关心,更有人质疑是否应该将住址与老人照片公开。对于民众的关心与该上传帖文的网民的相助,使我们深受鼓舞”。 社会与家庭发展部也表示,在疫情期间,许多家庭也随之受到影响,因此需要相互关照,也应该确保协助能够随之传达到有需要的人身上。 若有遇到需要协助的老年人,社会与家庭发展部也表示,可通过护联中心(AIC)的热线1800-650-6060或拨打社区关怀计划(ComCare)热线1800-222-0000,获得更多协助。