It was reported that service disruptions were encountered by DBS and POSB Bank customers in Singapore on Friday (5 May).

Many were unable to use the digibank online and mobile services starting around 11 am. It marked the second time in two months that the bank’s digital services have faced significant outages.

Also, many of its ATMs were found to be non-operational. The bank responded that its team had been notified and was working to resolve the issue.

However, customers criticized DBS’ response, arguing that instead of blaming the problem on increased traffic, the bank should have explained why it had not upgraded its system to handle such increases.

This incident followed a similar disruption experienced by DBS Bank customers on 29 March less than two months ago, during which they were unable to use digital banking services for over 12 hours, from 7 am to approximately 7:30 pm.

DBS CEO Gupta feels embarrassed for 29 March disruption

At the time, following the disruption on 29 March, DBS CEO Piyush Gupta said he felt embarrassed during its Annual General Meeting (AGM) which was held two days later on 31 March.

“As such a well-known digital and technology bank, this embarrasses us. We are committed to doing better,” Gupta said. “Ensuring uninterrupted digital banking services 24/7 has been our key priority. Unfortunately, we fell short of it and are truly sorry.”

During the AGM, DBS chairman Peter Seah also had to bow to shareholders, apologising on behalf of the bank. Calling the incident “very unfortunate” and “disappointing”, he said, “Our customers have every right to expect more of us. So, underscoring the gravity of the matter, we will be convening a special board committee with immediate effect to conduct a full and detailed investigation of the incident.”

Following the disruption on Friday, Gupta apologized for the recent digital disruptions and said the bank is committed to doing better.

He said that DBS Bank had convened a Special Board Committee to oversee a full review of the bank’s IT resiliency after the March incident, to be performed by an independent external expert.

“We will complete the review as a matter of utmost priority and implement all recommendations expeditiously,” Gupta added.

MAS says disruptions unacceptable

With regard to the 29 March incident, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) also weighed in to condemn DBS. Calling the incident “unacceptable”, MAS said it takes seriously the reliability of banks’ critical IT systems and added that DBS has fallen short to “maintain high system availability and ensure its IT systems are recovered expeditiously”.

“MAS will take the commensurate supervisory actions after gathering the necessary facts,” it said.

Just last night,, MAS further announced an additional capital requirement imposed on DBS Bank in response to the widespread unavailability of the bank’s digital banking services on 29 March and subsequent disruption to its digital banking and ATM services on 5 May.

The additional capital requirement amounts to approximately S$1.6 billion in total additional regulatory capital, including the capital requirement imposed on DBS in February 2022.

Ms Ho Hern Shin, Deputy Managing Director (Financial Supervision), MAS, stated, “DBS Bank has fallen short of MAS’ expectations for banks to deliver reliable services to their customers. The repeated inconvenience caused to the public is unacceptable. The additional capital requirement imposed at this time underscores the seriousness with which MAS treats this matter. DBS Bank must spare no effort in dealing with the underlying issues leading to these disruptions.”

And in 2010, MAS similarly penalised DBS for yet another digital outage, disrupting its digital banking services.

History of technical issues in DBS

Friday’s disruption was the latest in a spate of incidents in recent years where DBS found itself in hot water over its digital banking services.

In addition to the digital outage on 29 March less than 2 months ago, a major incident also happened in November 2021. At the time, Gupta said he would shore up its engineering team and strengthen its recovery protocols.

On top of the three disruptions, DBS also came under fire in June 2021 over a payment processing glitch that caused some customers to be charged twice on their credit and debit cards.

Meanwhile, the bank’s annual report released on 10 March shows that Gupta’s total pay for last year increased by 13.2 per cent to S$15.4 million. In 2021, his total pay was S$13.6 million, and the year before, S$9.2 million.

Ironically in the report, Gupta said that DBS needs to continue strengthening its technology in areas such as site reliability engineering.

A former IT person who worked for DBS many years ago told TOC, “In those days before outsourcing and when the IT department was handled mainly by Singaporeans, you never hear about service outages.”

He was subsequently retrenched when DBS started to outsource its IT work.

Subscribe
Notify of
88 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

年轻人发起本土首个气候集会 两千群众以行为艺术吁政府正视环境问题

昨日,年轻人自发发起的新加坡气候集会(SG Climate Rally)成功在芳林公园举行,吸引近两千群众出席,旨在吁求政府在应对气候危机上采取更有力的措施。 这也是在我国首次举办的气候集会。 有别于严肃的政治诉求,这场集会也增添适合亲子互动的活动,例如介绍环境问题的流动小图书馆、人体彩绘小站、讲述森林消失问题的卡牌游戏,讲述地球的故事等等。 现场一个“写明信片给议员”的柜台颇为引人注目,参与者可以写明信片,寄给他们选区的议员,质询诸如烟霾、碳税、石油能源等等议题,这些明信片将在明日寄出。 集体行为艺术警示环境公害 活动现场由数名关注环境议题的新加坡人致词,最小的演讲者是11岁的Oliver Chua。活动进行到傍晚六点,最后主办方邀请参与者一同进行集体行为艺术,如骨牌效应般倒下。 倒下的集会者代表那些因为环境公害消失的生命或物种,警示人们环境问题的伤害,无人幸免。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySk6AgQZxZM 询及未来的动向,主办当局称将继续维持动力以将他们的号召付诸行动,包括呼吁新加坡政府,依据跨政府气候变化委员会报考,削减我国的碳排放量,同时完全退出对污染行业的投资。…

UK’s Red Arrows to visit Singapore on 15 Oct

The Red Arrows, the dynamic aerobatic team of the Royal Air Force…

金管局:没操纵汇率

对于美国财政部把新加坡并列入汇率操纵观察名单,我国金融管理局在今日发文告表示,并未操纵其货币以获得出口优势。 金管局在文告中解释,我国金融政策框架以汇率为中心,旨在确保中期物价的稳定,不会也不能通过汇率来取得出口优势和经常账目盈余。 “诚如美国财政部报告所言,金管局在政策范围内,管理新加坡元的名义有效汇率 (S$NEER,即一国对各贸易伙伴国名义汇率,加权平均后的汇率指数),如同他国央行通过定位利率来实施货币政策一样。” “无论是针对汇率或利率,央行首要任务,都是把消费者物价通胀维持低点和平稳。” 金管局也解释,如果刻意削弱新元,将导致通膨急窜,从而影响该局稳定价格的目标。 金管局也认为,我国的经常账户盈余( current account balance )也要视情况来分析。在我国发展早期,即1965-1984年间,经常账户赤字平均接近GDP的10巴仙,投资需求大于储蓄。随着经济成熟,投资需求逐渐减少,故此国家储备也就增加,这使得经常账户有盈余。 金管局评估富裕程度提高将增加消费,而随着公共和私人储备用于应付人口老龄化的需求,我国经常账户盈余将随之减少。