Connect with us

Current Affairs

Teen receives S$225,000 payout after suffering cardiac arrest following vaccine jab

Published

on

Having suffered a cardiac arrest after his first COVID-19 vaccine jab, a 16-year-old boy has received S$255,000 under the Vaccine Injury Financial Assistance Programme (VIFAP), said the Ministry of Health (MOH) on Monday (16 Aug).

This is the highest amount anyone can receive under the programme.

In the case of the teenager, MOH said in its statement he is recovering steadily and is undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. He can now perform daily living activities without assistance, the Ministry added.

“He will likely be discharged in the coming weeks, but will likely require outpatient rehabilitation for some time before he can return to school and resume other activities,” the statement read.

It was noted that a medical team will continue his treatment and monitor his condition.

According to the MOH, the boy collapsed in his home after a gym weightlifting session on 3 July, just six days after getting his first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine.

Medical investigations found that the boy had developed acute severe myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscles, which led to the cardiac arrest, said MOH.

The statement added that the myocarditis was likely a serious adverse event caused by the vaccine he received, which could have been aggravated by the strenuous weight lifting and high consumption of caffeine in the form of energy drinks and supplements.

He was in critical condition following the cardiac arrest and was placed in the intensive care unit at the National University Hospital (NUH).

On the one-time VIFAP payment of S$225,000, MOH said that the independent clinical panel appointed to assess and adjudicate VIFAP applications found that while the boy has made good improvement, his condition is “severe and critical” and he would require treatment and rehabilitation “for some time yet” to continue his recovery.

The 16-year-old is not the first to receive financial aid under VIFAP, though it is the highest payment.

Health ministry On Ye Kung revealed in a written parliamentary reply on 6 July that authorities had approved S$451,000 worth of financial aid under the programme as of 25 June to 102 applicants who had suffered serious side effects from the COVID-19 vaccine.

According to the MOH website, the financial aid provided via VIFAP is fixed and depends on the severity of the side effects which are classified into three categories.

The first is side effects that result in death or permanent severe disability. The one-time payment for this is S$225,000.

The second category, with a pay-out of S$10,000, applies to cases that require admission to high dependency or intensive care with subsequent recovery.

The third category is in cases that require inpatient hospitalisation and medical intervention with subsequent recovery, excluding visits to A&E without subsequent inpatient admission. The payout for this category is S$2,000.

The payouts will be determined based on the highest quantum a person is eligible for.

In its statement, the Ministry also advised people to avoid any strenuous activity for seven days after receiving their first and second dose of the vaccine, and to seek immediate medical attention if they develop chest pains, shortness of breath or abnormal heartbeats.

Additionally, individuals who developed myocarditis after their first dose of the mRNA vaccine should not receive further doses.

MOH also noted that the local incidence rate of myocarditis after being vaccinated, the rate remains low at 0.48 per 100,000 doses administered based on data from the Health Sciences Authority (HSA).

Last month, a man named Andrew Tan claimed that his mother passed away “suddenly” just 29 hours after taking her first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. She has collapsed while mopping the house.

TOC understands that the death of Mr Tan’s mother is under pending review as the toxicology report will take a couple of months to be completed. However, the MOH is disputing any connection between her death and vaccination.

Following reports of the teenager’s cardiac arrest and subsequent VIFAP payout, netizens rallied on The Straits Times and Channel NewsAsia Facebook Pages to wish him well. However, several commenters wondered about the severity of his conditions since he was determined to be eligible for the highest payout available reserved for death or permanent disability.

Many were also concerned that the sum of S$225,000 may not be enough to cover all his medical bills or the potential loss of income that he will suffer due to his condition.

Two netizens suggested that the MOH should bear all his medical costs for the rest of his life as well.

Others cautioned that young people should think twice before being inoculated, and suggesting that they should be given a choice of receiving other vaccines like Sinovac instead.

One person questioned the MOH’s advice to seek medical attention if they suffer chest pains or shortness of breath. She noted that when she informed authorities of her brother’s case when he became breathless after the first dose, she was told not to “speculate”.

Continue Reading
18 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending