Illustrating an example of the level of competition Singaporean PMETs face when available jobs are open to foreign talent from India which has a significantly larger population and therefore graduates, Progress Singapore Party (PSP)’s Jeffrey Khoo did a simple experiment.

In a Facebook post on Wednesday (15 July), Mr Khoo said he tried out the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) employment pass (EP) eligibility test to illustrate the argument that there has been no “free access” when it comes to EPs.

He said, “But when the bar is too low, it can be equivalent to “free”, particularly when there is no cap or quota.”

For his test, Mr Khoo used an example of an Indian National who graduated from the University of Hyderabad in India which has a rating of 601-650 in the QS Global Ranking for universities.

For reference, Mr Khoo noted that NUS and NTU are ranked 11th and 12th respectively while India’s top universities are “only at best in the top 200 ranking”.

Mr Khoo’s fictitious applicant has also “worked for 6 years and is applying for an IT service Manager job in Singapore that pays $7000 a month”.

The results, which Mr Khoo shared in screenshots, shows that the applicant does qualify for an EP subject to other checks such as “employer’s eligibility” and the applicant’s history.

Mr Khoo asked in his post: “Now take a step back and think about the number of universities in India, and the number of graduates they will produce.

“What do you think will be the end result if every good paying PMET job available in Singapore is open to India and the world?”

In the comments section of his post, Mr Khoo said that he thinks it would be better to have some form of limits on EPs, acknowledging that “This has to be carefully considered as we do need to have some foreign talents in Singapore.”

“The important question is how many and of what quality,” he added.

One netizen shared how their former boss, an Indian national, was “very fond of getting” his Indian colleagues from the company’s Mumbai branch to understudy them.

Mr Khoo then shared the experience of a fellow PSP member in a senior role who had to take on a waitressing job when she was “replaced by [a foreign] understudy after 4 months”.

Subscribe
Notify of
37 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Bodies of 7 more Singaporeans identified, said MOE

Ministry of Education (MOE) in its latest update has confirmed that bodies…

社论:职总富食客应釐清为何年迈小贩过劳死?

英语时媒《独立》因撰写两篇文章,指涉职总富食客未通融导致年迈小贩过劳死,可能惹上官非。 富食客的代表律师David Lim&Partner致函《独立》,要求后者撤下相关两篇文章并道歉。 第一篇文章指读者爆料,指六、七号摊位的年迈小贩被富食客“欺压”,在农历新年期间申请缩短营业遭拒,为避富食客罚款,被迫工作18小时,导致过劳死。 第二篇文章则指富食客对同样在樟宜机场第四航空楼食阁营生的陈姓年迈小贩,罚款3500元,原因是后者脚伤无法开档数日。 富食客透过律师函指出,两篇文章含有诽谤成分,意指富食客涉欺压、并导致年迈小贩的死亡,而且半年后仅归还4万原抵押金的半数。 同时,对四号摊位受脚伤而休业数日的陈姓小贩,重罚3500元罚款;《独立》指富食客专找老弱小贩下手,透过欺压小贩来赚钱,让后者声誉受损。 关于过劳死年迈小贩,富食客指《独立》在此事的报导失实,即他们从未收到有关方姓小贩的申请。 富食客也强调,在二月19日,分支经理发现小贩身体不适,说服他去接受治疗;小贩逝世后也为其家人伸出援手,取消了摊位终止合约罚金。 小贩的儿子也清楚富食客正处理保证金、销售收入和器材等的退还手续。富食客也指出,小贩家属并未向任何网络媒体投诉。 为何没收到老人的缩短营业时间申请? 然而,事情本不应就此告一段落,富食客似乎还没有釐清,农历新年期间,老人人手不足,没有理由不向管理层或合作伙伴求助,如果富食客没有收到老人缩短工时的申请,原因又是什么?老人是否有何苦衷?…

逾37万次调查鉴定6500蚊虫温床 环境局罚款约900家庭

国家环境部(NEA)于今年首五个月,展开了37万2000次的调查行动,鉴定导致国内骨痛热症病例剧增的全国蚊虫滋生情况。 当局在23日发布的一项声明中指出,已经鉴定了将近6500个蚊虫滋生地点,并且罚款了约900户家庭。 兀兰二病例集中区 当局指出,两个最大的骨痛热症病例集中区,也可说是携带病菌体的伊蚊传播区都位于兀兰区,包括了兀兰6道、兀兰环路、兀兰新镇和兀兰圈。这些地区共累积了360宗病例。 其他的病例集中区有包括基里玛路(Guillemard Rd)和沈氏大道(Sims Avenue)的龙芽,共投报了115宗病例、菜市(112宗),以及包括惹兰仑巴汤申(Jln Lembah Thomson)、Soo Chow Rise和汤申路上段 (Lakeview)的汤申地区,共累积了99宗病例。…

Surprise and dismay among netizens over 86-year-old who has been working as a cleaner for 15 years

A netizen expressed shock upon discovering an elderly 86-year-old cleaner in Singapore still working, despite his age. The cleaning schedule of an HDB block, including the cleaner’s introduction, was shared on Facebook by Fahrurazi Degil. Netizens expressed disappointment over the elderly’s inability to retire due to low income, depleted CPF savings, and other reasons. While some have suggested that the incumbent government’s policies contribute to this vicious cycle, the Singapore government announced in Budget 2023 to increase the minimum monthly payout for the Retirement Sum Scheme from S$250 to S$350 starting 1 June 2023. However, according to the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP), an older Singaporean would need $1,379 a month to meet his or her basic needs.