People’s Action Party (PAP) Member of Parliament (MP) for Tampines GRC Baey Yam Keng took to his Facebook last Wednesday (3 Mar) to share a commentary on Singapore national reserves made by a foreign commentator.

In his Facebook post, Mr Baey, who is also the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Transport, shared a post, titled ‘Debunking the myths about Singapore’s national reserves‘, by Critical Spectator, a commentary blog which is run by a Polish national named Michael Petraeus.

Mr Petraeus gained national recognition sometime in late 2018 and 2019 due to his series of posts that were somewhat deemed as pro-Government.

While his early posts discussed issues like Brexit, China’s work culture, and US politics, he later on became critical of Malaysia’s former Prime Minister, Dr Mahathir Mohamad. His commentaries also painted Singapore in a positive manner, causing many to question his motivation.

In the recent post that Mr Baey shared, the Polish national discussed which element of the national reserves that the Government has kept as a secret, justifications on why such is done, as well as Workers’ Party (WP) MP Jamus Lim’s points on currency speculation.

Legislative levers may be needed to address the threat of foreign interference: Josephine Teo

Interestingly, just two days before Mr Baey shared the commentary by Mr Petraeus, Second Minister for Home Affairs Josephine Teo said in Parliament that legislative “levers” may be needed in Singapore in order to respond better to “hostile information campaign”, as part of efforts to fight against foreign interference in the country’s politics.

Mrs Teo explained that these levers will permit the Government to get necessary information to investigate hostile information campaigns to determine if they are of foreign provenance or artificial.

Additionally, they would also allow authorities to “break the virality” of such campaigns if they are indeed conducted by foreign actors to subvert Singapore’s politics, and to push for counter-messaging to warn the people of Singapore of these campaigns, she noted.

“Singapore needs to be open to the world to make a living. But our diversity and openness also present opportunities for foreign actors,” said Mrs Teo during the Ministry of Home Affairs’ (MHA) Committee of Supply debate on 1 March.

Subscribe
Notify of
37 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

社论:怎能不避嫌

荣誉国务资政吴作栋再次成为众人焦点:他澄清自己的职务并没有领薪,在2011年卸下内阁职务后,仍热衷为民服务。 但是,他没有告诉民众的是,他目前仍是国家金融管理局的高级顾问,同时也是野村控股公司的顾问团之一。 同样,吴资政只告诉了我们事实的一半。他并没告诉我们,他还领着马林百列集选区议员约19万元的年薪,以及退休金。至于他身兼其他顾问职是否有津贴,我们不得而知。 这也带来一个根本问题:一些政治人物在卸下职务后,仍能够在其他机构乃至私企受委,更不用说那些纸将军们,在退役后就被安插在一些官联机构。从军旅走入官企,在踏入政坛,似乎成了不成文的规定。 吴资政或许不明白,为何人民会对部长薪资议题穷追猛打。 一些网民就已提出精辟见解:老百姓不关心你到底是不是千手观音、做得到的话,身兼百职都行。 但我们真正关注的,是“裸薪”的机制– 是否能公布朝野政治人物的每年薪资和总体所得(包括花红),以及在其他团体组织是否有担任任何职务,如有,薪资多少? 裸薪,不只是为了避免官员贪腐,才假借高薪养廉为借口,为自己许以高薪。裸薪也意味着透明化,政要是要公布财产的,人民公仆拿多少薪水、是否还有其他额外收入,一切坦荡荡,开诚布公给老百姓。 要么,就每年公布所有部长、议长、朝野议员的薪资财产,包括身兼顾问职是否领津贴,也要公布。由政府公布以正视听,这样就能省却民间无谓的猜测和流言,不需要老百姓整天乱猜。 遗憾的是,迄今为止,我们除了有一份2017年内阁成员薪资检讨报告,含有部长薪资计算方程式,对于政治职务者的薪资透明化,做到真正裸薪,仍还有很大距离。 要么,为避免民间指责政治人物私相授,透过政治委任来奖励特定人物,即使民间组织主动举荐,也应懂得避嫌,新加坡人才济济,不愁找不到人来接任这些民间或私企组织的职务。特别是提拔更多青年才俊。…

China opens Hong Kong headquarters for its secret police

by Jerome Taylor and Su Xinqi China opened a new office on…

SMU survey: Consumers more satisfied with F&B sector

Consumers were more satisfied with the food and beverage (F&B) sector in…

No plans to go to DORSCON Red but have plans for general election amidst COVID-19 pandemic

Health Minister Gan Kim Yong has earlier said on 14 Feb that…