It was reported in the Indian media today that an Indian MP and BJP member, Subramanian Swamy, has asked the Indian government to put the Lakshmi Vilas Bank (LVB) merger with DBS Bank India on hold (‘Subramanian Swamy asks PM Modi to put LVB merger with DBS on hold‘, 4 Dec).

Sawmy has sought to put the LVB-DBS merger on hold in order to facilitate a forensic audit of the takeover of the assets of LVB by DBS. Swami called for an examination of the allegations against the DBS made internationally and in the company’s home country, Singapore, on money laundering.

In his letter to PM Modi, Swamy said, “What is amazing is that RBI had sought objections from stakeholders which were to be filed by the close of business hours on November 20, 2020, effectively giving less than 72 hours to them to respond.”

He noted that several stakeholders, notably the bond and shareholders, had raised objections to the scheme. However, the RBI forwarded the draft proposal for Cabinet’s approval in great haste on November 25, without factoring any such objections. Subsequently the merger came into effect on November 27.

Swamy alleged that the haste with which RBI carried out the LVB-DBS merger, the unprecedented and unreasonable terms under which the bond and shareholders’ interest have been written off, and the arbitrary manner in which DBS Bank India was chosen without going through any standard operating procedure, raise serious questions on the functioning and integrity of Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which is India’s central bank.

He added that despite the fact that the RBI is armed with extraordinary regulatory powers as well as the Boards of all Banks including LVB’s are represented by RBI’s nominees, banks after banks have suffered losses with their non-performing assets (NPA) rising.

Swamy said there is a serious flaw in the functioning of RBI and lack of accountability inside the central bank.

Meanwhile, it has also been reported that DBS Bank India has already received the capital infusion of Rs2,500 crore (S$450 million) from DBS Bank Limited, Singapore, as stipulated in the agreement as part of the condition for the LVB-DBS merger.

Subscribe
Notify of
182 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lawyer argues for more sentencing options for offenders with mental disorders

By Chooi Jing Yen, Partner at Eugene Thuraisingam LLP The Courts have…

欣见2020年国人觉醒 陈清木敦促政府审慎缓解国人当前困境

前进党秘书长陈清木医生,在脸书透过短片发表新年感言,欣见国人在2020年觉醒、选民趋向成熟。同时,他也敦促政府施政表现更大的透明度和更严明的问责制,审慎决策以缓解国人当前困境。 他坦言,2020年对所有人来说都是艰苦的一年,我们目前正经历着立国以来最严重的经济衰退。无论是哪个行业,都因这次的经济下滑收到冲击。 我们当中有些人失去了工作, 也有些人感染了冠病。大家都寄望新的一年能为国家经济注入新的气象。 “深受其害的不只是新加坡。全世界都因冠状病毒的肆虐而陷入停滞。这病毒是无形的,各国政府能做的就只能是通过封城或行动限制令来阻止它的快速传播。代价是经济发展因而停顿,许多社区与人民也因此陷入经济困境。” 我国并没有对冠病免疫、也不能幸免疫情对经济的冲击。他指出,许多国人已跌至贫穷线下,但政府未设定明确贫困线,使得他们未能及时受到经济援助。 仍需要助失业国人、恢复经济荣景 “所幸的是,下来疫苗接种计划的全面开展,能为疫情的有效控制带来一丝希望。 但是它所能做的也就只是阻止病毒的传播。 我们仍然需要重建经济,并帮助失业的国人进行再培训和再技能化,使国家经济能恢复疫情前的荣景。” 对于2020年,陈清木欣见新加坡政坛继续蓬勃发展,选民也趋向成熟。 “但令我更感欣慰的是有许多来自不同领域的杰出才俊,不畏强权挺身而出,选择与我并肩参加2020年的大选。”…

“探讨如何衡量公民社会成熟度” 尚穆根疑曲解韩俐颖原意

日前,内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根,声称新加坡在一定程度上已经面对外来势力的干预。他更点名历史学者覃炳鑫和自由新闻工作者韩俐颖等人,去年8月30日前往马来西亚吉隆坡拜会马国首相敦马,吁请后者带头把民主带到新加坡等东南亚国家。 此外,尚穆根不忘挑起,覃炳鑫与韩俐颖也曾联名申请成立公司,但使用外国资金在新加坡推动民主和人权等课题。 他更指出,韩俐颖曾在一段视频中指出,新加坡不如香港,没有50万人上街游行,她希望透过《新叙事》(New Naratif)主办课程,改变这点。 对于尚穆根的指控,韩俐颖也在个人博客指出,尚穆根所说的视频,应是指自己在2016年,于新民巷主办“公民抗命及社会运动”论坛上发表的言论。然而, 后来竟被谣传是,她希望新加坡可以像2019年的香港一样。(莫非韩俐颖有预知能力,当时就知道三年后香港的局面?) 她说,自己在2016年的言论,被一些亲行动党的网络“喷子”(troll)粉丝网页拿来断章取义和恶搞,难道部长的实际消息来源,是来自这些喷子网页? 韩俐颖还原当时说了什么 她解释,自己实际上在致词中说,如果要以香港50万上街的人数,来衡量所谓公民社会运动成功的标准,新加坡不如香港。但是,“50万人上街”(就是走上街头的人数)绝不是有效的KPI标准,来衡量一个国家公民社会的力量和成熟度,社群网络间的团结也很重要。 如果有行之有效的民主程序,那最好,就不需要有50万人上街诉求;但是一个能运作的民主,仍需要一个成熟和有韧性的公民社会。 这意味着,她从头到尾,都没讲过要靠《新叙事》课程主办的课程,来改变新加坡不如香港没50万人上街游行这点;更何况,《新叙事》迟至2017年9月才成立,在她发表相关言论时《新叙事》根本不存在。 她在博文中感叹,当自己参与本地公民社会活动的同时,也没少成为霸凌或恶搞的对象;而有关“外国势力干预”的说法,也由那些亲行动党脸书专页等宣传放大,故此如政府将来推出新法来应对“外国势力”,也不感到意外。…

Local groups call for greater freedom of expression in light of mounting charges against activist Jolovan Wham

A group of Singapore organisations have come together in a letter calling…