It was reported in the Indian media today that India’s central bank, Reserve Bank of India (RBI), has seized control of the struggling Lakshmi Vilas Bank (LVB) and “forced a merger” with DBS Bank India Ltd (DBIL), which is wholly owned by DBS Singapore (‘RBI brings in DBS’ India unit to save Lakshmi Vilas Bank‘, 18 Nov).

Mint, an Indian financial daily, reported, “The (Indian) banking regulator on Tuesday (17 Nov) seized control of the struggling Lakshmi Vilas Bank (LVB) and forced a merger with the local unit of Singapore’s largest lender DBS Bank, the first time the central bank has tapped a bank with a foreign parent to backstop an Indian rival.”

Bloomberg, on the other hand, described the merger as a “rescue effort” by DBS Bank. An institutional investor advisor told Bloomberg that LVB, based in Chennai, was “pretty much insolvent” and that “the writing has been on the wall for a while”.

And according to the Hans India, it reported, “The move (merger) is being termed in the financial world as the fastest resolution of a failed bank.”

LVB gasping for capital while experiencing “serious governance issues”

Mint said that RBI’s surprise intervention to force the capital-starved LVB to merge with the stronger DBIL came after watching LVB struggled to find a suitor to help it meet minimum capital requirement, thereby saving LVB.

The bank has been in a bad shape for some times and desperately gasping for capital. Not only did its capital adequacy ratio fail to meet regulatory norms, but the ratio had also turned negative in the Sep quarter. Its capital adequacy ratio (CAR) shrank to -2.85% as at end Sep, against a regulatory minimum of 10.875%.

The bank’s loss has also widened to Rs397 crore (S$72 million) in the Sep quarter from Rs357 crore (S$64 million) loss a year earlier. It has been under RBI’s radar for prompt corrective action (PCA) since Sep last year.

“The financial position of Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd (the bank) has undergone a steady decline with the bank incurring continuous losses over the last three years, eroding its net-worth. In the absence of any viable strategic plan, declining advances and mounting non-performing assets (NPAs), the losses are expected to continue,” RBI said.

LVB is also experiencing a continuous withdrawal of deposits and low levels of liquidity, RBI added. More importantly, RBI revealed, “It (LVB) has also experienced serious governance issues and practices in recent years, which have led to a deterioration in its performance.”

LVB’s entire capital to be written off after merger with DBIL

As part of the merger process, RBI has capped withdrawals at Rs25,000 (S$450) at LVB for a month.

It’s entire capital will also be written off after the merger with DBIL. “The entire amount of the paid-up share capital and reserves and surplus, including the balances in the share/securities premium account of the LVB, shall stand written off,” a RBI notification said. “The transferor bank (LVB) shall cease to exist by operation of the scheme, and its shares or debentures listed on any stock exchange shall stand delisted.”

That is to say, with the write-off in paid-up share capital and reserves and surplus, the bank’s equity will go down to zero.

This is the third time in about a year that RBI has seized control of a bank. The other two were Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) Bank and Yes Bank Ltd. Many banks are under pressure in India due to bad loans. Going through legal means to get back money from debtors is also tricky in India as court cases can easily drag over 20 to 30 years (‘India’s dysfunctional court system with 40 million pending cases threatens CECA deals‘).

Meanwhile, RBI praises DBIL saying that it has the advantage of strong parentage linking back to DBS Singapore. RBI further disclosed, “It (DBIL) will bring in additional capital of Rs2,500 crore (S$450 million) upfront to support credit growth of the merged entity.”

RBI added that the combined balance sheet of DBIL and LVB would remain healthy after the merger, with capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (CRAR) at 12.51%, without taking into account the infusion of additional capital.

But in case of any debentures, bonds, or any other financial instruments owed to creditors by LVB, DBIL will have to pay the creditors out of its own accounts, according to the terms of the merger.

DBS Bank India welcomes merger with struggling LVB

In a statement, DBIL welcomed the merger. It said, “The proposed amalgamation will provide stability and better prospects to Lakshmi Vilas Bank’s depositors, customers and employees following a time of uncertainty.”

“At the same time, the proposed amalgamation will allow DBIL to scale its customer base and network, particularly in south India, which has longstanding and close business ties with Singapore.”

DBIL added that the capital infusion into LVB will be funded from its existing resources.

The sudden move by RBI to get LVB to merge with DBIL is said to have also taken employees’ union at LVB by surprise. A senior union member has declined to comment as they said they have yet to see the details of the merger.

It’s not known what the unions at LVB would demand from its new owner DBIL.

Subscribe
Notify of
29 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Of complacency and leading by example

Leong Sze Hian questions some govt policies and failings.

社交媒体批判声音有存在必要 安华:掌权者不应阻挠

邻国马来西亚人民公正党主席安华(Dato’ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim) 认为,社交媒体是公共討论、针砭时弊的最佳平台,政府不应多加管控。 根据邻国《东方日报》报道,安华在“2019年社交媒体週”致辞时,认为掌权者不应阻挠社交媒体上的言论自由。 安华曾是烈火莫熄运动的精神领袖,如今也是波德申国会议员。 “为推动国家进步,社媒上的討论与批判声音有存在必要,这是言论自由的体现,政府或掌权者不应阻挠。”他说道。 社交媒体旨在监督当朝政府 安华强调,社交媒体的角色,不是当权者的传声筒,旨在监督当朝政府,理应对监督政治人物是否随着人民意愿执政。 他表示前朝政府试图以法限制社交媒体的言论自由,这是错误的示范。他还说:“只有贪腐及丑闻缠身的政府,才会想方设法干预社媒,因为他们倍感恐惧。“…

总理起诉许渊臣 林鼎将担任辩护律师

针对新加坡总理李显龙起诉本社总编许渊臣,林鼎将担任后者的辩护律师。预计聆讯将在下月30日进行至12月4日。 2019年9月5日,本社总编收到代表总理李显龙的达文星律师楼( Davinder Singh Chambers LLC)寄来的原告诉状和法庭传票。 诉状中,对本社英语站发表《总理夫人何晶奇怪地分享了一篇与家人断绝关系》的文章,总理提出异议,指该文章作出不实和无根据,并且贬低和诋毁总理。 去年9月27日,许渊臣提呈答辩书。许渊臣认为内容是复述李总理弟妹的话,并不具诽谤性质。 林鼎在今日在脸书公开讲作为本社总编辩护律师的消息,指出他赞赏许渊臣和《网络公民》作为独立媒体的工作,也强调替代媒体作为民主制度中第四权的重要。正是这类替代媒体能确保有权势和社会精英能继续接受问责。 许渊臣则表示,由于面对许多法律技术层面的挑战,不得已而寻求律师id协助。他也担忧总理的律师在审讯时挑起法律上的失误,为此需要有一名代表。此前,许一直在审讯中为自己辩护。 除了许渊臣,林鼎律师也代表时评人梁实轩,在面对总理的诽谤诉讼中辩护。 I…

Ho Ching gets May Day award

Award given to Temasek’s ex-CEO for “contributions to the labour movement”.