Inside courtyard of the Supreme Court of India, Bhagwandas Road, New Delhi, India. Source: Wikimedia user Pinakpani, used under a creative commons license.

Bloomberg published a news article on Tuesday, highlighting how difficult doing business in India can become especially with their infamous judicial delays that threaten to hinder businesses and scuttled deals (‘What a 38-Year-Old Turmeric Scandal Says About Business in India‘, 18 Aug).

A recent top court ruling in India revealed how inefficient the Indian court system can be. The Supreme Court recently ended a 38-year saga of an alleged turmeric forger, who was arrested in 1982 and, eventually, sentenced to a month in jail and a 500 rupee (US$6.70) fine. After a decade, the top court reversed his conviction; the two lower courts took around 14 years each to render verdicts.

The lifespan of the turmeric case is extreme but not alone. There are currently almost 40 million cases pending across India’s three-tiered judicial system. Among the 25 state high courts in India, there are now roughly 173,000 pending cases for more than 20 years. This works out to nearly an average of 7,000 long-pending cases of more than 20 years in each state high court. And about half are more than 30 years pending. Those cases less than 20 years old are not even included.

The World Bank ranks India in the bottom 15%, worse than Pakistan, Syria and Senegal, when it comes to contract enforcement by the courts. Without a good and efficient legal system to enforce contracts by the judicial system, a signed contract is as good as an unsigned one with no repercussion when a contract is infringed.

India’s long judicial delays hurting deals

The long judicial delays have tied up some of India’s biggest corporations and would-be massive deals. For example, IHH Healthcare’s attempt to take over Indian hospital chain Fortis Healthcare Ltd was scuttled by Daiichi Sankyo’s fight to enforce a US$500 million arbitration agreement against the founders of Fortis who are the original owners of the company.

Tan See Leng is the former CEO of IHH, which operates the highly profitable Parkway Pantai. Under Tan, IHH made multiple acquisitions including India’s Fortis. By Nov 2018, IHH succeeded in acquiring the 31.17% stake with board control in Fortis, thereby triggering a mandatory takeover offer the company. The mandatory takeover offer was put on hold in Dec 2018, when India’s Supreme Court ordered a halt to the acquisition following a petition by Daiichi.

Daiichi sought a stay on the Fortis sale as the former Fortis owners had not fulfilled their commitment to pay the Daiichi as per previous Delhi High Court order. The former owners were said to have created encumbrances on their shares even after the court order. They themselves are also under investigation by the Indian authorities for fraud. As a result of Fortis’ trouble in India, it also affects IHH. IHH’s auditor, KPMG, had issued a “Qualified Opinion” of IHH’s financial statement for FY2019 (‘PAP candidate Tan See Leng leaves IHH at a time when KPMG issues “qualified opinion” on its financial statement‘).

Tan then left IHH by the end of last year. He later joined PAP and participated in last month’s GE under Marine Parade GRC. He and his team won with 57.7 percent, and he was appointed a full minister by PM Lee. He is now a Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office as well as Second Minister for Manpower and Trade and Industry. PM Lee said that Tan’s business experience would add a private sector perspective to Singapore’s economic policy making.

In any case, long judicial delays would invariably create a lot of uncertainty for foreign companies otherwise interested in doing business in India, as uncertainty makes investors nervous. But not for Singapore government and its GLCs.

After signing CECA with India in 2005, Singapore started pouring billions investing into businesses in India. However, if Singapore GLCs ever get into a court fight over any business deals in India and it takes another 38 years to settle, by then even Singapore 4G leaders would already be gone from this world.

Subscribe
Notify of
22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NTU – university or censorship watchdog?

“Only political and no academic grounds were ever cited by the university…

营中银行卡被盗 宵小刑满还同营服役

在军营里偷窃、到营外消费赃款,该被军法还是刑事法制裁,又或者两者都能定罪? 一名国民服役营员,日前分享自己在军营里遭宵小的经历,同时也对小偷最后只被军事法庭判处监禁15周,却不会在警方档案留下犯罪记录,感到十分疑惑。最令他懊恼的是,小偷在军事扣留营期满后,还会和他同营服役。 这名不愿具名的营员,且以伟俊代称,向“网络公民”阐述事件缘由。去年6月,伟俊从外头回到他服役的军营,发现放在储物柜里的银行卡不见了, 原本他不以为然,以为是忘在家里了。 然而,他在晚上8.57分,却收到银行短信,指其户口在电动车专卖店消费了2千余元,伟俊才警觉自己的银行卡被盗用了。他随即透过网络登入自己的户口,发现有3千元被转入他人银行户口,以及被盗用35元付德士费。 在他人劝告下,伟俊决定报警,不过警方基于案件在军营内发生,于是将此案转交军警处处理。经调查,伟进才得知是自己的一位营友,乘自己忘了锁上柜子,偷走了银行卡。 “相信他猜中了我的银行卡密码是我的生日,才能盗款得逞。国威向警方坦承。包括我的现金,共盗走5千多元。” 未指示小偷归还赃款 伟俊曾询问军警调查官可否拿回他被盗的款项,被告知需静候军事法庭裁决。然而,军事法庭并没指示小偷归还伟俊的钱,而且,用赃款买的电动车,也已归还给有关店主。 宵小只被罚拘留在扣留营15周,也不会在警方档案留下案底。 伟俊询问其律师意见,律师认为,该宵小已触犯刑事盗窃罪第379项224章,也有足够证据带上法庭,对新加坡警方为何没有采取行动,律师也感到不解。 伟俊认为,有关宵小盗窃罪证确凿,即触犯刑事罪,除了军法,理应也受刑事法的制裁,被带到刑事法庭问罪,判定相应的刑罚。…

SingPost’s loss-making Indian subsidiary placed under liquidation

In a press release today (1 Dec), Singapore Post announced that Quantium…

Amos Yee’s former bailor demands unreserved apology for molest allegation

Mr Vincent Law, 51, family and youth counsellor, has told TOC that…