President of BATU Nasordin Mohd Hashim received Comrade of Labour (Star) award at the NTUC May Day Awards 2018 (Photo: NTUC)

On Thursday (15 Oct), a heated debate over a minimum wage erupted in Parliament between Members of Parliament from People’s Action Party and Workers’ Party.

It started when MP Koh Poh Koon, who was speaking in his capacity as the deputy secretary-general of NTUC criticised WP’s proposed policy of setting a universal minimum wage of $1,300 a month in Singapore. He said that this could lead to unemployment as businesses may face unsustainable higher costs.

Presently, the PAP government is adopting their Progressive Wage Model (PWM) which attempts to set minimum wages by industry. For example, the PWM already sets a minimum wage for the cleaning, landscaping and security sectors but with mandated wage increases as the worker gains more skills and experience. The Government is said to be looking into applying PWM to other sectors too.

The fiery exchange, which lasted close to 50 minutes, saw WP MPs Assoc Prof Jamus Lim and Leon Perera countering the arguments brought up Koh. Koh was forced to rise up and defend himself several times during the debate.

“The problem with a minimum wage is that it is not connected to any skills ladder. It is a number and the employer then has to decide if the employee makes the mark or it’s too costly for him,” Koh argued.

“Folksy wisdom and beliefs”

One of the arguments raised during the debate was whether academic studies done on minimum wage are relevant.

Koh said that the tripartite partners already look at data in their discussions, but the practical considerations of carrying them out may be challenging. He brought up Hokkien idioms used by a union member to illustrate this and the colloquial wisdom lying behind these phrases.

Assoc Prof Lim then impressed upon the House that WP’s proposal is based on studies that show that a minimum wage does not lead to an increase in unemployment, and is not based on “folksy wisdom and beliefs of labour union leaders”.

The use of the word “folksy” by Assoc Prof Lim in Parliament appears to have triggered the enmity of some people linked to NTUC.

Irritated by the term “folksy”, the former president of the Building Construction and Timber Industries Employees’ Union (BATU), Nasordin B. Mohd Hashim wrote to ST Forum today criticising Assoc Prof Lim for belittling union leaders (‘Forum: Jamus Lim’s remarks belittle work of unionists‘).

BATU is, of course, affiliated to NTUC headed by the former PAP Cabinet Minister as well as former Chief of Defence Force, Ng Chee Meng.

Nasordin said that he had previously represented BATU to make recommendations for PWM in the tripartite clusters for cleaners and also for landscape workers.

“It is regretful that the Workers’ Party’s Jamus Lim made comments in Parliament on Thursday not just belittling our hard work all these years, but also seemingly putting down the intricate issues involved in outsourced industries such as cleaning, landscape and lift maintenance,” he added.

“Folksy, as we understand the term, refers to a simple manner of one being friendly and, perhaps, informal in behaviour… In the context of the parliamentary debate, when Associate Professor Lim alluded to ‘folksy’ union leaders who think that the Sun revolves around the Earth, it belittles the years of hard work put in by unionists.”

To be fair, Assoc Prof Lim did not say union leaders think that the Sun revolves around the Earth. It’s not known how Nasordin could have come up with such thoughts.

Nasordin went on to say that BATU did engage many workers to obtain feedback from them so as to help craft the PWM. Touting the success of PWM, he said, “Between 2013 and 2018, real median monthly gross wages of full-time cleaners and landscape workers grew cumulatively by around 30 per cent and 32 per cent respectively.”

“There is no doubt all unionists care deeply for our workers. We wish for them to achieve more in their jobs, giving them the dignity of earning a decent living and the pride of career progression,” he shared.

“The PWM allows for that. Since the PWM was implemented, it has been easier to encourage workers to upskill themselves. We are confident this will bode well for them in the near future, even as the economy reshapes during this crisis.”

In any case, Nasordin is no longer the president of BATU.

 

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
71 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Wah lau, TNP, buay pai seh ah?

This is was originally posted as a blog post. Kirsten Han/ I…

教育部否认 阻跨性别学生进行荷尔蒙补充疗法

新加坡教育部否认,阻止一名18岁跨性别学生的荷尔蒙补充疗法(HRT),称不能干涉任何治疗。 日前,一名18岁跨性别大学生,在Reddit上控诉教育部阻止她进行荷尔蒙补充疗法。该名学生指出,她认为自己是“由男性转为女性”的跨性别女性,此前曾被心理卫生学院诊断出患上“性别焦虑症”(gender dysphoria)。 性别焦虑症,是指持续感到自己的生理性别与心理性别(即性别认同,如男性、女性、混合、中性或其他)不符,不仅会引发当事人困扰,更可能严重影响社会功能。 她也向《海峡时报星期刊》透露,自己于2019年经诊断患有性别焦虑症,并于2020年3月,将诊断证明交给校方。 对于她的决定,身边的朋友和师长均愿意支持,家人也同意让她进行荷尔蒙补充疗法(HRT),并与医生达成共识,在18岁后开始进行治疗。 然而,她却在去年8月刚满18岁时,医生却告诉她,经过教育部与他开会后,要求医生停止开诊断证明给学校,也不能在尚未通知教育部的情况下,推荐患者进行治疗,也因此导致她无法再从中获得诊断证明。 对此,教育部则回应,“我们无权干预任何治疗,这都是由相关家庭决定的事情。” “所有学校均有照顾学生之责,并配合家长和医疗人员密切合作。” 教育部也吁请学生和校方澄清,讨论学校应如何提供更多帮助,并鼓励若遇到不友善行为的学生应寻求学校或教师的帮助。 MOE is…

S’pore needs to break away from risk-averse culture

Yee Jenn Jong / SMU don, assistant professor Chung Wai Keung, is…