Source: Chee Soon Juan Facebook

Dr Chee Soon Juan brought attention to the exposure of a lamp post’s wires near a playground in Bukit Batok. 

On Monday night (3 Aug), Dr Chee uploaded a picture revealing internal wires of a lamp post exposed at Bukit Batok Block 230. The exposed area was missing the cover, and had a piece of barricade tape tied around it. 

Another picture showed the exact location of the lamp post which was situated next to a badminton court, with a playground nearby. 

These pictures were taken at about 1pm on Monday. 

“This was brought to my notice on 1 Aug. Even though a warning tape was tied around it, it’s still a dangerous situation to have especially with a playground nearby. This needs to get fixed immediately,” Dr Chee asserted. 

The 57-year-old chief of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) contested in the Bukit Batok Single Member Constituency (SMC) in the recent General Election (GE) 2020. He garnered 45.2 per cent of the votes, losing to Murali Pillai of the People’s Action Party (PAP).

Soon after Dr Chee’s post, a Facebook user, who goes by Bs Koh, commented that he had found the cover nearby and attached it back to the lamp post. However, it had to be held together by the barricade tape as it was loose. 

“I found the cover somewhere on the ground nearby, this (is) the best I can do right now, but it’s still unscrew…”


The admin of Dr Chee’s Facebook page thanked him, but cautioned him against going near exposed wires for his own safety. 

“Thank you. But you shouldn’t get close to the exposed wires for your own safety. Please be careful.”

Mr Pillai has yet to address this issue. 

Past community works that were uncompleted or left in a negligent state

This is not the first time Dr Chee has sounded out works in the community that were unfinished or left in a state of disarray. On Saturday (27 Jun), he questioned the lack of fulfillment and delays in Mr Pillai’s SMC projects. 

In a Facebook post, he uploaded a series of photos of signboards carrying notices and announcements about projects such as the “Neighbourhood Renewal Programme” and “Revitalisation of Shops”. 

He compared timelines and deadlines of these projects with the stages of completion that are actually taking place in the SMC, two of which he said have carried a delay of three years. 

He also talked about uncompleted construction works that are unsafe and hazardous. “They are left unfenced and uncovered; not only are these safety lapses an eyesore, (but) more importantly, it also poses a safety hazard (and) should be quickly rectified”. 

Four days after Dr Chee’s post, the areas in question were properly cordoned off when he went back, even though it has always been in the “most crowded spot in Bukit Batok with a wet market and a huge hawker centre,” Dr Chee added.

“The people elect you to run the estate, you collect the $16k/month salary, (but) out-source the work to a managing agent and then make the people pay for it. Someone please explain the logic to me,” the secretary-general of SDP commented.  

Hotly debated issues between PAP and Dr Chee during GE campaign

Some of the points of contention debated during the campaigning period included the importance of having a full-time Member of Parliament (MP) serving the residents. 

Dr Chee explained that it’s difficult for an MP to work six to seven hours a day at another job and then make his way to the ward in the evening to spend time with his people.

The other notable issue was the ambivalence of a planned 10 million population for Singapore. 

During the live debate on Wednesday (1 Jul), Dr Chee argued that Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat seemed to have proposed the idea of raising the population to 10 million by continuing to bring in foreigners—especially foreign PMETs—into Singapore to compete with our PMETs for jobs. 

Both Mr Heng and Dr Vivian Balakrishnan had vehemently denounced these claims in the days following the debate. 

It has been subsequently reported that Hyflux CEO Olivia Lum seemingly claimed during a townhall meeting that the PAP government had “given instructions” for her company to plan for 8 million population. While it is unknown if there is any documents that can prove such claims but there has not been any POFMA orders on this claim by Ms Lum.

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

A lesson in citing irrelevant statistics

by Leong Sze Hian I refer to the articles “School system ‘still…


日前明星律師萧丁明涉殴打两名员工,今日以故意伤害罪等4项刑事罪名被提控上庭。 根据《亚洲新闻台》报道,去年4月17日,他被指抓伤侄女的手臂,并将他推向桌子,还出手赏了他好几次耳光;另外,他也涉嫌将一名女员工推倒,并对着另一名女员工戳额头;他也曾涉嫌出言“我会拿刀杀了你”,威胁员工。 一开始,萧丁明与女员工争执的音频于去年5月曝光,当时已引起社会哗然;而相隔一年后,一段萧丁明殴打两名女员工的视频又再网上曝光,引起了法律界的轰动。 今日该名涉嫌多项罪名的律师出席法庭时,面容憔悴。 现年46岁的萧丁明,是萧丁明律师事务所的经理。并且开设光线演艺经纪公司(Beam Artistes)。去年五月消息蒲曝光后,萧丁明曾与受害人互相提告对方,但最后双方均撤销告诉。随后萧丁明也在脸书上发表声明表示,他已接受教训,也希望能够接受他的歉意。 但相隔一年后,即是今年4月,萧丁明又被踢爆殴打员工的视频,他说明,并不了解爆料者的用意,他想要完成什么目的。他续指,他确实感到非常压力,因为要同时经营三家公司,对于一个企业家而言,时间就是持续不断的施加压力给他。 “我知道这不是借口,但已过去一年,涉案人员也达成和解,也希望能将此时翻篇。” 他表示,希望能尽快了结此事,让他的生活能够继续也让这些不断要伤害我的人最终都能落下帷幕。他将在下月回庭继续审理。 根据故意伤害罪,一旦罪成,萧丁明将可能被判两年监禁,罚款5000新元或两者兼施;而使用暴力罪则一经裁定,可判处3个月监禁,罚款1500新元或两者兼施。 萧丁明曾有殴打员工记录 去年,一个长约30分钟,发生在萧丁明律师事务所的打人视频在网上流传。其中光线演艺经纪公司女员工还报警,指控萧丁明抓住和推她等。随后双方达成和解,彼此都于去年5月撤回彼此的报案。…

“恐有损总理形象” 《砂拉越报告》非议总理律师团对梁实轩穷追猛打

得理不饶人?早前,时评人梁实轩因误传一篇假新闻惹祸,但即使已经撤下文章并作出道歉,总理的律师团队仍坚决对后者提告,此举亦迎来国际爆料网站《砂拉越报告》的非议。 梁实轩是在11月初,分享了誌期11月5日的State Times Review(STR)文章,标题为《李显龙成为一马公司弊案主要调查对象》。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,针对一马弊案接受访谈,但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 故此,梁实轩本身也是假新闻的受害人,在不知情情况下误传失实报导。梁实轩也收到资讯与媒体发展局(IMDA)来函,要求他在在六小时内撤下有关文章,梁实轩也照做无误,并作出道歉。 《砂拉越报告》访问了梁实轩,后者告诉《砂》,他自愿删除有关失实贴文,也承认文章内容不实,但即使这么做,还是被总理律师团队诉诸法律行动,令他感到惊讶。 《砂》形容,如今梁实轩的处境如处在夹缝中进退维谷,无论庭外和解或自我辩护,对他都不利,总理的律师团队似乎要索讨巨额赔偿。 何以要对已道歉的普通老百姓穷追猛打? 对此,《砂》质疑既然资媒局已经对梁实轩采取严厉行动,总理的律师团队还要对这名普通新加坡百姓,采取强硬手段对付? 《砂》质问,梁实轩和他人一样,被假新闻误导,也为此删除贴文并道歉,但何以他还是成了“新加坡最有权势者”的眼中钉,被施以“毁灭性的报复”。 不利总理在民间形象…

Singapore to tighten maritime security after Raffles Marina breach

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Home Affairs Teo Chee Hean told…