Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had a conversation with American philanthropist and businessman David Rubenstein and the Atlantic Council on 28 July. The Atlantic Council is an American think tank that focuses on international affairs.

One of the topics addressed by Mr Rubenstein was regarding the salary of the Singaporean government officials. He wanted to know what system Singapore adopts and how Mr Lee was convinced that it is “the best” one for the nation.

“One thing that has always been unique about Singapore is that it pays its government officials a kind of private-sector compensation. In the United States, we pay very low salaries for government officials. What is the system that you have and are you convinced it’s the best system to use in Singapore?”

In response, Mr Lee said that the existing system works for Singapore, despite acknowledging that it is “not uncontroversial”. He went on to say that the Government pays the officials “according to what he (or she) is worth), as well as “according to what they are contributing”.

The Prime Minister noted that if the Government does not do that, it would compromise on the quality of the civil service.

“I think it works for us. It’s not uncontroversial, but we believe that it’s best that we pay the person according to what he is worth and according to what he is contributing.

“Because if you don’t do that, either you will compromise on the quality of your civil service or people will find ways to make up and compensate, camouflage forms of compensation, or you’ll have a revolving door and you have something when you go out, after you retire, and I think those lead to other kinds of big problems.”

He went on to say that it is “better” for the Government to be open and honest about this very difficult problem, adding that it will make sure that the Singaporean public officers are “paid competitively”.

“We believe it’s better for us to be open about this and to be honest about this very difficult problem, but to make sure that our public officers are paid competitively. And if you enter the political leadership, then you are paid a clear and significant discount compared to the private sector, but not such a huge discount that it becomes unwearable.”

In relation to Malaysia’s corruption issues, Mr Rubenstein asked Mr Lee if the high salaries paid for the Government officials are the reason why Singapore has “no corruption”.

The Prime Minister responded that paying officials high salaries is one of the factors that “make it easier” for the Government to deal with corruption. He revealed that the nation did come across officials “at many levels”, and some even with “quite high ones”, who have “succumbed to temptations”.

He asserted that the Government has to act against these officials “zealously”.

“It’s not the only factor, but it’s one of the factors which makes it easier for us to deal with this problem, but we still have this problem. From time to time, we come across officials at many levels, some quite high ones occasionally, who have succumbed to temptations and we have to act against them zealously.

“Even if it’s embarrassing or awkward for us, we have to do it. Because if we didn’t do it, then that’s the end of the system. And you will not be able to maintain the integrity and reputation which we have built up for so many years.”

Subscribe
Notify of
37 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Low Thia Khiang explains his decision to move out of Hougang

Loke Hoe-Yeong/ Low Thia Khiang emphasized from the outset that he had…

Let’s not be too “smart” for our own good.

Reading a description of the future of Singapore, starting with the ambitious…

1500 foreign sex-workers operating in HDB heartlands

By TR Emeritus A website claiming to be “Lion City’s No. 1…

串谋他人骗逾七万元津贴 培训顾问被判入狱29个月

一名培训顾问私吞7万2000元培训津贴,于周四(9日)被判入狱29个月。 47岁的被告Loh Peh Wen, Serene面对五项控状,指她与两人合谋,骗取新加坡劳动力发展局(WDA)发放的培训津贴。 法院在判决时,也将另外八项类似控状纳入考量。 被告于2014年3月至2015年5月期间,和两名同谋串通,向劳动力发展局捏造13向索偿申请,骗取总值超过7万2000元的总支出。 他们捏造为Yoke Mah Plasterceil有限公司的员工提供了13项课程,且全部员工都有参与,然而有关事件实际上并不存在。有关的课程原本应由劳动力发展局批准的另外两家培训机构提供。 为了支持有关的捏造申请,被告还要求同伙伪造参与者出席率。 涉及此案的其他四人也正在审理中。