People’s Action Party’s (PAP) senior politician and MP Tharman Shanmugaratnam pointed out that keeping low interest rates to deal with economic slowdown due to COVID-19 pandemic is not an effective or sustainable long-term solution.

Speaking in a virtual panel organised by DBS Bank as part of its two-day Asian Insight Conference, Mr Shanmugaratnam cautioned against the impact on retirement funds and economic recovery globally.

He added that there is also “a very real risk of a submerging world” as decades of worldwide economic growth, contributed by the growth of emerging economies like China, could be wiped out by the fallout from the pandemic.

“The strategy of an extended period of very low or negative interest rates, as (far) as a significant payoff in terms of corporate investment goes, just hasn’t been very effective or efficient,” he said at the conference on Thursday (23 July).

The one-hour virtual conference was moderated by DBS chief economist Taimur Baig, and along with the PAP’s member, the panel also consisted of former International Monetary Fund (IMF) economist Raghuram G Rajan.

Generally, cuts on United States Federal Reserved (Fed rate) has an impact on interest rates all around the world, including in Singapore. The Singapore Interbank Offered Rate (SIBOR), in which interest rates are pegged, is linked closely to global money markets. This is why when the Fed cut happened in the US in March, the one-month SIBOR has dipped to about 0.25 percent, a decrease from above 1.5 percent before the pandemic.

When asked on the possibility of continuous low interest rate environment, Mr Tharman said: “We’ve gone through an extended period — almost uninterrupted since the (2008) global financial crisis — of extremely low interest rates and substantial amounts of liquidity flowing around the system. You don’t need to be an economist to say this has contributed to much higher levels of corporate leverage (using borrowed money to invest).”

By lowering interest rates, it makes it less expensive for businesses to lend money, which is helpful during a crisis as it helps to spur investments and spending. Many central banks around the world have cut their interest rates to historic lows due to the global financial crisis and the rates have remained at near record lows ever since.

Risk increases with low interest rates

Although Mr Tharman said that lowering interest rates “is the right thing to do in the midst of a crisis”, but prolonging such a strategy did not benefit in spurring corporate investment significantly since the global financial crisis in 2008.

In fact, Mr Tharman, who is also Monetary Authority of Singapore chairman, said that it resulted in investors’ money channelled into higher risk investments or “in an indiscriminate fashion” into emerging markets in order to look for higher yields amid the low interest rate environment.

“We entered this crisis with a lot of risk in the system already, and a fair amount of that risk was the consequence of well-meaning central banks suppressing risk premia and encouraging people to go on a search for yield by looking for more and more risks,” Mr Tharman noted.

Echoing the same sentiment, Professor Raghuram also stated that when a pandemic occurs, investors began pulling out of emerging markets until the Fed cut its rates in March, and money started going back in.

“If we have more blows to come, which is still an area of uncertainty, then perhaps what (the Fed) have done is just to stave off the moment… acting as a palliative rather than a solution,” he explained.

Additionally, pension funds and retirement savings around the world will also be affected due to lowering interest rates, said Mr Tharman.

When there is a possibility of retirement and pension funds dropping, this will lead to people saving more money and spending less.

“That’s the natural reaction. And when you save more, you’re consuming less, and that becomes a dampener to growth as well. So that’s another reason why one has to be a little sceptical about the effectiveness of this strategy in promoting growth,” he said.

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

苏睿勇田径总会执行董事马利克提出诽谤令状

两届马拉松冠军苏睿勇,针对新加坡田径总会(SA)执行董事马利克(Malik Aljunied)未在限定时间内回复,向法庭提出诽谤令状呈请,相信未来将会对薄公堂。 苏睿勇于昨日(27日)在脸书上帖文表示,由于马利克未在限定时间内回复先前所寄出的律师信函,因此正式向法庭提出呈请。该律师信函于8月19日寄出,内容控诉马利克于社交平台上恶意中伤,并向马利克要求赔偿金与公开道歉。 文内他也警告新加坡田径总会,一旦要公开控诉一名运动员,就应该要准备好证据,否则就必须做好被追究责任的准备。 “如今我祝愿马利克一切顺心,只有愈早致歉,才会对你、奥委会、新加坡田径总会是最好的选择。”他表示。 马利克于本月17日在脸书上上载一张他和两个小女孩的合照,并写道希望照片中至少有一人能成为400米跨栏的选手。 然而在帖文内容中,马利克也写道“要堤防马拉松,它最终会扰乱你的思维和心绪”,疑似在影射苏睿勇。 除此之外,有一名网友也在马利克帖文的评论区留言问道,“马拉松到底如何扰乱思维和心绪”时,马利克回答说它是针对“目前的一名特定马拉松运动员”,指对方的“理智已被搞砸到无法修复”。 马利克还说到,“这似乎显示了他缺乏同情心、同理心、不知感恩和爱护他人的能力”。 苏睿勇律师Clarence Lun指出,马利克目前在脸书上明显与具毁谤性的留言,所映射的人只有苏睿勇,因此将会针对马利克发出诽谤的索赔要求。 对此,奥委会向《今日报》透露奥委会将不涉及两人之间的司法诉讼,认为苏睿勇已公开与奥委会所有的书信往来,因此不予置评。…

TOC Breaking: MDP to be abolished for drug couriers under certain circumstances

~by Atticus ~ The Government has proposed amendments to abolish certain mandatory provisions…

COVID-19: Vaccine creation by Singapore and US firm might be ready for clinical trial by August

As various companies and partnerships around the globe scramble to develop a…

未优先考量本地雇员 一千家公司被列入观察名单

昨日,人力部长杨莉明在国会表示,本地有1000家公司因为聘雇时没优先考虑新加坡籍员工,在公平考量框架(,Fair Consideration Framework,FCF)下被列入黑名单。 她指出,自从公平考量框架观察名单在2016年推出以来,人力部已拒绝多达3千份就业准证申请,一些则是雇主本身取消。 与此同时,在上述观察名单企业,招聘的新加坡籍PMET(专业人士、经理、执行人员和技师),逾4千400人。 今年初,杨莉明称在新近更新的公平考量框架下,若有雇主在雇佣雇员时未公平考量或歧视本地雇主,将面对更严重惩处。 自年初更新以来,共23名雇主因不公平雇用方式受对付。 不过,仍有求职者反映,当局设立的“职业库”(Jobs Bank)“形同虚设”,一些雇主用迂回的方式,考量聘用外籍人士的案例仍存在。 就在两个月前,一家物流公司为外籍员工申请就业准证(EP,即Employment Pass),却谎称已先面试了两名本地人,结果面控。 先斩后奏?…