Minister Lawrence Wong said earlier on that the Workers’ Party (WP) cannot just continue to question and ask for changes to the Government policy, now that it has 10 MP seats in Parliament after its win in Sengkang GRC and Aljunied GRC at the General Election (GE).

“It is also their duty to put forward serious policy alternatives to be scrutinised and debated,” Mr Wong remarked at a press conference on 18 July.

Following his reminder to the WP, one netizen – who goes by the name Gerard Ong – called out the Minister on Facebook on 19 July, asking about his right to “admonish and remind” the alternative party that it cannot just continue to question the Government policy.

“Come on Lawrence Wong, the Workers Party MPs are not school boys and girls elected into parliament. Neither are you a school prefect watching over your charges.

“As elected MPs of course they have every right to continue to ask questions of the PAP government. That is their right and job to do so. Because if they don’t then they are not true representatives of the people who voted for them,” he wrote.

Noting that Mr Wong was elected into Parliament the same year as the WP’s Pritam Singh and Sylvia Lim were elected in 2011, Mr Ong highlighted “one big difference” to the Minister’s appointment as an MP in Parliament.

“You came in on the coattails of two ministers in West Coast GRC, while Pritam and Sylvia had to fight to their darndest with Low Thia Khiang and his team, to wrest Aljunied GRC from two cabinet ministers and one senior minister of state,” he explained.

Mr Ong went on to remind Mr Wong that his titles in politics are meant to be “reserved for the very few in Singapore’s parliamentary history”.

“Please stop acting as though you are the grand sage of the PAP with all the years of political wisdom and worldliness coupled with lengthy experience in parliamentary and contentious debates in policy proposals and issues,” he added.

Mr Ong also brought up about the blank cheque that the WP’s Jamus Lim mentioned in the political debate on 2 July, saying that “it resonated well with many Singaporeans”. He claimed that the WP has been working on the alternate policy proposals and will continue to do so despite the “inaccessibility of Government data, reports and statistics”.

“We live in hope that the newly elected opposition MPs will receive the respect and support that they are entitled to in a parliamentary democracy,” he remarked.

Mr Ong further noted, “PM Lee has said he will provide the necessary support and staff to Pritam. He also looks forward to the 10 new opposition MPs and two NCMPs participating in and contributing to parliamentary and national debates – we shall see if the PM and his cabinet will be truthful and respectful partners in this endeavor.”

WP’s chief Pritam Singh says the Party will continue to propose alternatives to existing policies

In response to Mr Wong’s statements, WP’s chief Pritam Singh took to his Facebook on 20 July noting that the Party will continue to propose alternatives to existing policies despite the constraints it faces.

“While the Government continues to have a 120,000-strong civil service as a potential resource for parliamentary debates, the WP continues to be primarily reliant on its volunteer base for its political work. Despite these constraints, we will continue to advance forward-looking suggestions for the welfare of Singaporeans,” Mr Singh wrote.

In addition, he said that the Party will encourage public conversations – such as the prospects of HDB lease decay – and will release public working papers to highlight issues that significantly affect Singaporeans.

Mr Singh also implied that the WP will continue to ask questions of the Government as part of its work in Parliament.

“Questioning any government of the day however, remains a fundamental role of a responsible opposition – not just in Singapore – but in any parliamentary democracy anywhere in the world. This duty is critical in holding the government to account and it will remain fundamental to the WP’s work in Parliament,” he added.

The WP’s chief asserted that the Party’s efforts in Parliament are centred on key bread-and-butter concerns such as jobs for Singaporeans, healthcare for seniors, and cost of living concerns, among others. While the key aspect of the WP’s focus will cover political issues that “have a direct impact on transparency, accountability, balance and fairness”.

“What remains to be seen is whether the approach of the PAP Government towards greater information sharing will turn in favour of greater openness. The extent to which realistic policy alternatives can be advanced both in public and in Parliament is also a function of the PAP’s approach to democratic politics,” he noted.

Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Police reports made against Mobile Air

The Singapore Police have confirmed that “police reports have been lodged against…

世界卫生组织将过劳列疾病分类

世界卫生组织(WHO)首度把“过劳”纳入《国际疾病分类》(ICD)。ICD是广泛运用于医师诊断与医疗保险的指标。 瑞士日内瓦召开的世界卫生大会(WHA)将于本月28日闭幕,专家们数十年来对于该如何定义过劳以及过劳是否应视为“身体病况”始终争论不休。 依据最新更新的全球疾病与伤害分类,世界卫生组织界定“过劳”是一种由于长期无法成功克服工作压力导致的症状。 世卫组织  表示,根据国际疾病分类,过劳是专门指在职场环境的现象,不应适用于描述生活中其他领域的经验,且此症状有3个特征:首先是感觉精疲力竭;其次是对工作产生倦怠感或忿忿不平;以及专业效率降低。 去年,在全球各地卫生专家推荐下起草将国际疾病分类更新,名为ICD-11并于25日WHA通过。ICD-11将于2022年开始生效。 世卫组织发言人贾撒列维克(Tarik Jasarevic)表示,这是过劳「首度」列入国际疾病分类。 过劳现象已成全球职场文化 美国斯坦福大学教授杰弗瑞·菲佛(Jeffrey Pfeffer)日前也接受BBC的采访表示,工作时间长、裁员、缺少医疗保险以及工作压力不仅给员工带来经济不安感,同时也是造成家庭矛盾和员工疾病的原因。 对于某些行业,员工超时工作已是家常便饭,如中国IT行业有996文化(早晨9点工作到晚上9点,一个星期工作6天);西方的一些机构也不相上下,特别是在银行业;日本职场文化中更是有专门词语形容过劳死。 很多时候,员工为了完成任务,在经历长时间上班后,回家淋浴又继续回到单位完成工作。 菲佛在采访中也表示,公司雇主们知道问题的存在,但却没有人愿意碰这个问题,最后,压力大的员工可能辞职。…

Singapore High Commission in London helping to secure return flights for Singaporeans to return home

The Singapore High Commission (SHC) in London announced that it is assisting…

A 55 year-old Singaporean made five visits to clinics before being confirmed positive with COVID-19

As of 12 pm Sunday (15 March), the Ministry of Health (MOH)…