The defamation suit filed by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong against veteran blogger and financial advisor Leong Sze Hian will be heard in the High Court early next month.

Mr Leong’s lawyer Lim Tean in a Facebook post on Monday (9 June) said that the hearing, which is set to take place from 6 July to 10 July, will be open to the public.

Responding to a commenter’s question on whether Mr Lee will be attending the court hearing, Mr Lim confirmed that the Prime Minister will be present at the said hearing.

The defamation suit concerns an article by shared by Mr Leong on his personal Facebook Timeline titled “Breaking News: Singapore Lee Hsien Loong Becomes 1MDB’s Key Investigation Target – Najib Signed Several Unfair Agreements with Hsien Loong In Exchange For Money Laundering” in November 2018.

The article, published by “Malaysian-based social news network” The Coverage, alleged that Mr Lee had entered “several unfair agreements” with Najib Razak, who was the Malaysian Prime Minister at the time the deals purportedly took place, “including the agreement to build the Singapore-Malaysia High Speed Rail”, according to court documents.

Mr Leong did not include any accompanying text alongside the article at the time he shared the article.

In an appeal following the striking out of Mr Leong’s counterclaim against Mr Lee’s defamation suit, Mr Lim argued before a three-judge panel that while Mr Lee “may be a litigant in person”, he argued that Mr Lee, as Prime Minister, is “bringing libel action to protect the reputation of his government”, and that consequently it has “a chilling effect on free speech”.

Mr Lim also highlighted that out of the “10,000 people” who had shared the allegedly defamatory article, Mr Leong was the only one to be sued by PM Lee.

“We have a case of the prime minister exercising the highest form of selectivism to determine who (the) recipient of libel claim will be and in this case it is directed at a prominent critic of the government who has written well over 2,000 articles over the years,” Mr Lim told the Court of Appeal during the open hearing on 27 September last year.

Chief Justice Menon said, however, that a plaintiff in a defamation action is “entitled to invoke the aid of the court to vindicate his interests if he is at the receiving end of a defamatory publication”.

Courts, he added, “cannot limit the rights of injured parties to access the courts, even if they happen to be public figures”.

The High Court earlier cited Mr Leong’s failure to disclose a “reasonable cause of action” in Mr Leong’s counterclaim as a reason to dismiss the counterclaim.

Justice Aedit Abdullah — who will be hearing the defamation suit early next month — in delivering his judgement last year, cited the Court of Appeal’s decision in Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301 [2018] 2 SLR 866, which “rejected the tort of abuse of process as a recognised cause of action”.

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

California WeChat users claim China surveillance in lawsuit

California WeChat users sued its parent company Tencent on Wednesday, saying the…

MHA responds to Branson’s call to halt Tangaraju’s execution, accusing him for “disrespect” for Singapore’s judges

On Monday (24 Apr), British tycoon Richard Branson urged Singapore to halt the imminent execution of Tangaraju Suppiah, a Singaporean who sentenced to death over one kilogram of cannabis, saying it “may be about to kill an innocent man”. “Tangaraju was actually not anywhere near these drugs at the time of his arrest. This was largely a circumstantial case that relied on inferences,” Branson, who is a member of the Geneva-based Global Commission on Drug Policy, wrote on his blog. “Killing those at the lowest rungs of the illicit drug supply chain… is hardly effective in curbing an international trade worth hundreds of billions every year,” he said, adding he hoped authorities would review the case. Tangaraju, aged 46, is set to be hanged on Wednesday (26 Apr), according to the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) of Singapore. However, Singapore’s Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) defended that the evidence clearly showed that Tangaraju was “coordinating the delivery of drugs for trafficking”, despite the suggestion that he was innocent because he was “not anywhere near the drugs at the time of his arrest”.

Defamation trial: High Court to publicly hear closing oral arguments on 15 February

The High Court is slated to hear oral arguments in Prime Minister…

Disciplinary tribunal hearing against prosecutors in Parti Liyani trial slated to take place between 6 Sep to 13 Sep

The disciplinary tribunal proceedings against Deputy Public Prosecutors (DPPs) Tan Wee Hao…