Students of Nan Hua High School, Singapore, in the school hall (Source : Wikipedia)

All schools in Singapore reopen its doors after the March holidays today (23 March), and the Ministry of Education (MOE) revealed that only less than 10 percent of students and staff who have travelled abroad are on leave of absence or stay-home notice.

MOE’s Director of Schools Liew Wei Li said to Channel News Asia (CNA) that this 10 percent includes students and staff from across all schools, including special education (SPED) schools as well as MOE kindergartens.

Last Thursday (19 March), MOE, along with the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) and the Early Childhood Development Agency (ECDA), announced that schools will reopen today as planned but with stricter measures imposed.

These measures include asking students and staff of schools, pre-schools, and student care centres who were overseas during the school holidays from 14 March to undergo a 14-day isolation period from the date of their return.

Separately, the Government also announced that all Singaporeans, permanent residents, long-term pass holders, and short-term visitors who enter Singapore from 11.59pm last Friday will also have to serve a 14-day stay-home notice.

Education Minister Ong Ye Kung also took to his Facebook on Thursday to highlight that “thousands of our students and their families have travelled overseas and have returned, or are now making their way back.”

Ms Liew told CNA that the “affected numbers are manageable.”

“Based on the travel declaration of students and staff prior to the start of the March school holidays, schools will contact the parents of the affected students, as well as affected staff, to inform them directly about the leave of absence,” she said.

Although there might be shortage of teachers who go on leave of absence or have to serve their stay-home notice, Ms Liew said that schools will make the “necessary adjustments” to make sure that classes can go on “uninterrupted”.

Ms Liew explained that the necessary adjustments include hiring more relief teachers and “adapting timetables”.

“MOE will also provide all necessary support to schools, including deploying teachers from other parts of the education service to schools for up to two weeks where needed,” she noted.

As for students who are staying at home, they will continue their lessons via Home-Based Learning, assisted by schools through different ways that is ideal for the students’ needs.

They can utilise the Student Learning Space, which has educational materials and resources for all teachers and students. Additionally, teachers can also give assignments to students using textbooks and workbooks, email them materials, and send them hardcopy packages.

Ong Ye Kung explains the reasons for MOE to reopen schools amid COVID-19 outbreak

Education Minister Ong Ye Kung took to his Facebook on Sunday (22 March) to point out three different reasons why his Ministry decided to reopen school after the March holidays amid COVID-19 outbreak.

He said scientific evidence, taking extra precautions, and a goal to reduce disruptions are the reasons why students are allowed to resume their classes today.

“Actually, part of the reason for the tougher border measures is to ensure we keep Singapore as safe as possible, so that daily activities, like going to work, eating out and attending school, can go on,” he said.

Citing scientific evidence which stated younger people are less susceptible to the deadly coronavirus, Mr Ong said it’s probably not “a bad idea” for kids to spend most of their day in school with classmates “who are less susceptible to the virus than adults”.

Additionally, the Minister also highlighted that closing schools will results in disruption of peoples’ lives, especially working parents with no help, and have limited childcare options. “We are particularly concerned about parents who are healthcare workers and providers of essential services,” he added.

Mr Ong added different precautionary measures were also in place in order to “safeguard the entire system”.

Some of the measures include the Government’s existing leave of absence and stay-home notice policy, as well as checks on individual’s travel history at school gates.

If that’s not all, students will also only be allowed to spend their school hours in their classes, with co-curricular activities suspended for two weeks.

On top of that, students who are not feeling well – regardless whether if it’s just a cough or sore throat – will be kept in an isolation room or sent home, Mr Ong said.

He also asserted that all students will sit apart, similar to as seating in exam halls, and be reminded to wash their hands regularly and avoid touching their faces.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

年纪轻轻心系社区! 18岁青少年送膳食助街友

18岁的青少年,如果有时间精力,会选择做什么?和朋友聚会,或是选择自己和家人共度?然而,一群热心助人的年轻人,选择将时间用在帮助有需要的人的身上,为他们送上膳食,也为社会尽一分力。 近日,《Our Grandfather Story》报导一群18岁热心年轻人的暖心故事,而其中两名接受采访的年轻人名为 Harrison和Sri。他们表示,会开始送食计划是因为当时在惹兰固哥(Jalan Kukoh)附近发现一名70岁老人,独自坐在板凳上。 于是他们向前询问老人是否已领取口罩,但老人的一番话仿佛给他们一记当头棒喝。 Harrison表示,“当时我们向前询问老人是否已经领取口罩,但老人却告诉我他不在意自己是否有口罩,因为他并不在意自己是否会离世。” Sri续指,当时此番话语点醒了他们,因为他们确实无法回应老人。这也是他们开始创立Comm.UnitySG的缘由。 目前该学生组织与志工机构New Hopes Community…

MND grades AHPETC "red" for corporate governance in TCMR

By Terry Xu The Ministry of National Development (MND) released an update…

Ho Ching gets May Day award

Award given to Temasek’s ex-CEO for “contributions to the labour movement”.

评论:个人代步工具– 关于阶级和愚昧无知

Nicholas Tang: 我必须老实说,我讨厌个人代步工具。我认为他们对社会是有威胁的,落实针对电动滑板车的禁令是应该的。我们也有同样的不满:我们讨厌它们在行人道上快速移动,我们讨厌个人代步工具让我们在已经非常狭窄的行人道,让路人无法安全走路,但通常就是很反感电动滑板车大声播放令人难受的音乐(例如小苹果),我觉得应该要把这也列为“犯罪行为”。 尽管如此,我却认为政府不应该禁止个人代步工具。当然,禁令是最简单快速的解决方式,但却不是最佳方案。这不仅仅是交通安全法规的问题,个人代步工具更像是揭露了社会的裂痕,而我们需要对这些裂痕加以修复,避免社会基础崩裂。我将聚焦在三种不同的要素,他们互相交织与连结,不能仅单独讨论:阶级、政府政策与社会责任。 阶级问题 其中阶级可分为两种问题:首先,他们被视为实用实惠,大众均负担得起;再者,个人代步工具开启了送餐行业新景象,让过去无法负担昂贵高效交通工具的人,找到另一种工作机会。 第一点,在颁布禁令后,网友何益豪(Kelvin Ho)将自己对禁令的不满发布到网上,其中已可明显看见阶级主义的效应。在Reddit中,所有的评论大部分聚焦在嘲笑他作为送餐员与新加坡口音。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czuM9-uxnJ4 嘲笑他人口音缺同理心 当然或许他的送餐经验相对缺乏,但他确实提出几点值得讨论。此外,新加坡确实有一部分人的口音如同何益豪,尽管不能理解他的论点,但也不能成为攻击他个人品行的原因,这显示社会不同阶层的人对彼此缺乏同理心的一种表现。 何益豪提出了观点:不是每个拥有个人代步工具的人,都能够负担摩托车,或是其他交通工具。…