During the Committee of Supply 2020 Debate in Parliament on Wednesday (4 March), several Members of Parliament (MP) raised their concerns and issues over the Ministry of Environment and Water Resources (MEWR)’s effort in managing waste in order to move towards to a Zero Waste nation.

As part of encouraging Singaporeans to work together toward being a zero-waste country, the government had earlier designated 2019 as the Year Towards Zero Waste and outlined the Zero Waste Masterplan for the citizens to be engaged in to “great effect”.

To this, Workers’ Party MP Chen Show Mao asked MEWR for a review and update on the results of the Zero Waste Masterplan during the parliament session.

Packaging waste

In his speech, Tanjong Pagar Group Representation Constituency (GRC) MP Dr Chia Shi-Lu raised his concerns on packaging waste, which formed a significant portion of domestic waste.

He pointed out that the country is “totally potential” to develop more measures in reducing packaging and plastic waste when he cited the National Environment Agency (NEA)’s statistics showing that 55% of packaging waste is made up of plastic, and only 4% of plastic waste is recyclable.

Noting that MEWR implemented the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework to deal with packaging waste including plastic, Dr Chia requested the ministry to share the details of how NEA plans to enforce the EPR framework.

Other than the EPR framework, MEWR also introduced the mandatory reporting of packaging data and development of 3R plans framework for involved companies. The framework will commence on 1 July.

With the upcoming regulations, Nominated MP Mohamed Irshad asked if MEWR will provide any support and measures for the involved companies to ensure the accuracy of data that has been given.

E-waste

During the Parliamentary session, Dr Chia also noted that the amount of e-waste generated in Singapore seems to increase every year.

Concerned about the growing amount of e-waste, Dr Chia and Mr Irshad posed the same question to MEWR, asking if the government has sufficient local recycling capability to process the expected volume of e-waste as well as provide other measures to ensure the proper treatment and responsible disposal of all collected e-waste.

Mr Irshad also asked about the progress of EPR framework, such as the number of operators who have applied or have been licensed to collect and treat e-waste, and if MEWR would consider expanding the framework beyond e-waste.

Food waste

Additionally, it was noted that the owners and occupiers of commercial and industrial premises that generate a large amount of food waste will be required to segregate their food waste for treatment from 2024.

Speaking on this, Mr Irshad questioned whether MEWR has determined the scope of affected premises and taken any measures to help the industry comply with the following regulations.

Single-use bag charge

Nee Soon GRC MP Louis Ng suggested that MEWR introduce a single-use bag charge as it has been successful in reducing the usage of single-use plastic bags in countries that have adopted a plastic bag charge.

In this note, he cited the example of England, saying, “In England, there was a 90% reduction. It was estimated that every person is using 10 bags in the most recent year, compared with 140 bags in 2014 before the charge was introduced.”

He also proposed to make the single-use bag charge mandatory for large retailers and optional for smaller businesses while waiving the charge when it comes to plastic bags for fresh food and meat items.

Use of styrofoam products

Workers’ Party (WP) NCMP Dennis Tan Lip Fong mentioned that styrofoam products are still widely used for food crockery and packaging at hawker centres and food outlets in the country.

Highlighting that the government has opted to discourage hawkers from using disposable ware instead of banning styrofoam products outright, Mr Tan, therefore, said, “I would like to ask for an update of the rate of use of styrofoam products in food crockery and packaging vis-a-vis other materials since 2016.”

He also asked the government whether it will review the use of styrofoam products for food crockery and packaging, and set a target to ban the use of such products or take measures to reduce the usage.

In addition, he also suggested that the government consider using bamboo products as an alternative to single-use products.

Government’s effort in recycling

Moving on, WP NCMP Daniel Goh Pei Siong noted that Singapore fails in the effort of domestic recycling, where the recycling rate is stuck at a dismal 21 to 22%.

Mr Goh suggested that the government change the National Recycling Programme to community-led recycling as a new strategy to foster the domestic recycling rate.

Citing examples in Germany, South Korea, and Taiwan, he said that the recycling programmes, as well as culture and norms of recycling, become entrenched in their communities.

Therefore, he suggested the Singapore grassroots organisations to take ownership by monitoring the recycling trends of each HDB block, diagnosing problems such as the low rate of recycling and organising campaigns to educate block residents.

Speaking on recycling, MP for Tanjong Pagar GRC Joan Pereira raised the issue of recycling bins at HDB blocks which are often overfilled, causing the residents to end up leaving the items around the bins.

Considering some items do not fit into the bins, she requested MEWR to increase the size of recycling bins and improve its design to something more user-friendly, or allocate more bins to each HDB block.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Save Atiqah – Second Chances Flea Market

The following was first posted at We Believe in Second Chances. In…

MOH: No answer as to what help Govt can provide for A&E referrals by GPs

The questions asked to the Minister for Health at the 22nd session…

《联合早报》发公开信 向当事人柯政杰道歉

本月7日,《联合早报》在官方网页分享文章《阻断措施期间足不出户 南大生不解为何染疫》。内容描述一名许姓南大生,阐述自己一家四口足不出户,但发现自身出现冠病症状等。 对此,事主柯政杰则在个人脸书分享,尽管自己确实确诊冠病19 ,但本身并没有授权记者使用他的个人资料和照片,也未同意受访。然而有关记者还是根据他在社交媒体Instagram的照片,撰写上述报导。 政杰指出他的社媒贴文,仅描述在博览中心隔离设施的情况,然而,记者的报导却提及他的家人、日常生活等,都是不实的资讯,认为对方已违反新闻伦理。 对此, 《联合早报》总编辑韩咏梅也在今日(13日)发表致读者公开信。 他先是解释《联合早报》并没有刊登上述新闻;也指记者认识柯政杰,留意到他的贴文而要求采访,不过后者已拒绝。 “记者在尝试说服柯先生接受访问不果后,仍然选择了错误的方式根据柯先生当时公开的贴文以及对他的认识,当成对方受访写了新闻。然而,记者这么做时,并没有告诉他的直属上司,柯先生其实并不愿意接受访问。” 该文承认有关记者确实违反工作守则,也不应指事主已接受访问;至于报导中事主被“改性”、家庭成员也被修改,则解释记者希望避免他人对柯政杰对号入座。不过,此事未得到事主同意。而有关报导也从zaobao.sg官网撤下。 不过,《联合早报》仍坚称报导未有虚构,而是根据柯政杰的社交媒体贴文撰写。 《联合早报》也对柯政杰郑重道歉。“我们不应该在柯先生拒绝受访的情况下说他接受访问。这件事提醒我们,必须不停地审视我们的作业,贯彻我们做新闻的原则与程序。”

Fire breaks out at Ang Mo Kio flat, preliminary investigation indicates fire caused by a PMD

On Monday (22 July), Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) took to its…