Minister of Manpower Josephine Teo

During the Parliamentary debate yesterday (3 Mar), Manpower Minister Josephine Teo told Parliament that about 1,000 firms have been put on the Fair Consideration Framework (FCF) Watchlist presently.

Since the list was introduced in 2016 four years ago, firms that were placed on the list have hired more than 4,400 Singaporean PMETs, she noted.

“Our objective is not just to penalise errant employers. We want them to improve,” she said.

There is, however, no mention as to how long were the Singaporeans PMETs hired and whether they are still being hired.

Under the FCF, employers that do not consider hiring Singaporeans fairly will be barred from hiring new foreign professionals or renewing existing ones for a minimum of 12 months, up to a maximum of 24 months. Employers and key personnel who make false declarations on fair consideration will also be prosecuted.

To date since the list was introduced, a total of 3,000 Employment Pass (EP) applications have been rejected or withheld by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), or withdrawn by employers, she added.

The salary criteria for hiring foreigners on an EP will also be raised. From 1 May, the minimum monthly salary for foreign professionals to qualify for an EP will go up from $3,600 to $3,900. “This increase is in line with improving wages of fresh graduates of local autonomous universities,” she pointed out.

According to the latest joint graduate employment survey published last Friday (28 Feb), the median gross monthly salary among fresh graduates in full-time permanent employment was $3,600 last year. So, the new minimum EP salary requirement of $3,900 is only about 8% higher than the median fresh graduate salary.

Ms Teo further announced that MOM will be stepping up measures to ensure fair hiring consideration in the workplace. Under the FCF, companies are required to advertise openings on the national Jobs Bank to give locals a chance to be considered first before they can submit their EP applications for foreign applicants.

This is to ensure fair hiring and guard against job openings being restricted to “closed circles of friends”, she said.

From 1 May, MOM will expand the advertising requirement to include positions paying up to $20,000 from the current $15,000. Job positions with salaries of $15,000 and above are currently exempted from the FCF job advertising requirement for hiring foreigners.

Jobs Bank a “wayang”?

Still, many netizens have commented that the Jobs Bank, supposedly set up by the government to encourage the hiring of more locals, is useless.

For example, a quick check on a forum frequented by foreign expats shows some companies are just putting up job advertisements on Jobs Bank for “procedural” purpose. They have no intention of hiring any locals since they already have a foreign candidate in mind:

From the forum thread, it appears that the company was ready to hire Amanda, a Malaysian Chinese, on EP even before it posted any job advertisements on Jobs Bank.

Amanda’s EP was said to have been approved just last Thursday (27 Feb). Perhaps Ms Teo might want to personally go check out if the job offered to Amanda by the company is being restricted to just “closed circles of friends”?

Companies caught for pre-selecting foreign job applicants and didn’t conduct any local job interviews

Together with the announcement of harsher penalties for discriminatory hiring practices in January this year, MOM named a few companies caught for flouting FCF.

One company, Ti2 Logistics Pte Ltd, was caught for making a false declaration to MOM. It submitted an EP application for a foreign job applicant for the position of business development manager. It had also advertised for the position of accounts manager on the Jobs Bank.

For the former role, it made a false declaration that it had interviewed two Singaporeans and considered candidates fairly when it had not done so. For second role, the firm also treated the job advertising requirement under the FCF as a paper exercise, posting a job description unrelated to the actual job.

In reality, it had already pre-selected an EP applicant for the business development position and had no intention to interview any Singaporean candidates. MOM charged the company with one count of making a false declaration to the Controller of Work Passes in its EP application. It has also been debarred from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for two years.

Like Ti2 Logistics, two other companies also did not interview any locals even though they had put up advertisements on Jobs Bank. Before putting up the job advertisement, Meyer Burger (Singapore) Pte Ltd had already interviewed a foreigner overseas and deemed him suitable for a process engineer post in Singapore. It then advertised the position on Jobs Bank for the purpose of applying an EP for him.

Meyer Burger did not carry out any interviews since it had already made up its mind to hire the foreign worker. The job advertisement was posted solely to make an EP application. MOM debarred the company from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for two years.

Tarantula Global Holdings Pte Ltd similarly submitted an EP application for the position of senior IT support engineer. Like Meyer Burger and Ti2 Logistics, the company had pre-selected the EP applicant, who was a former employee of an affiliated overseas company. It put up a job advertisement, but likewise did not interview any candidates other than the chosen one. The company was debarred by MOM from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for 12 months.

Another company, Nihon Premium Clinic Pte Ltd, submitted an EP application for the position of regional customer development manager. It omitted listing critical key criteria in its job advertisement like the ability to speak fluent Japanese and Mandarin, when they were actually required for the job.

As a result, none of the job applications submitted was suitable for consideration as the local job applicants did not know that fluency in Japanese and Mandarin was required. Instead, an EP applicant recommended by one of the company’s shareholders was deemed suitable after an interview.

For not giving fair consideration to Singaporean candidates, Nihon Premium Clinic was debarred from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for 12 months.

All these companies could have avoided legal troubles with MOM if they had taken the trouble to at least “wayang” a bit to interview some local candidates.

In such cases, the companies can still give the excuse that they have interviewed the locals and did not find any of them suitable. It would then be difficult for MOM to find fault with these companies.

Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOE to update CCE syllabus for primary level; students’ ‘mental resilience’ is one of the desired outcomes: Chan Chun Sing

Following the gruesome alleged murder of a 13-year-old student by a fellow…

废婚内强奸豁免、“起底”成刑事罪 多项新修例明年起生效

上周五(27日),律政部发文告提醒群众,《刑事法典》(Penal Code)以及其他法令中一系列修例,将在明年1月1日起(下周三)正式生效。 在新生效的修例下,包括透过科技拥有、偷录获散播偷拍视频,乃至传“露鸟”照或视频都被列为刑事罪行。 生效的新条例也包括《刑事改革法》(CLRA)和《防止骚扰法令》(POHA)修法。上述修法草案分别在今年5月6日及7日分别在国会中别通过。 法案也加强对弱势受害者的保障,例如:对未满14岁孩童、女佣、身心残障者的犯罪刑法将加倍;对亲密伴侣施暴、包括强暴,婚内强奸豁免权也被废除。 最低刑事责任10岁 此外,最低刑事责任的年龄也从过去的七岁调高到10岁。 在刑事法改革法案下,也废除了企图自杀罪;不过,教唆未成年、缺乏心智能力者自杀得逞,仍可判死刑或终身监禁,或坐牢长达20年。 “起底”可构成罪行 而未来恶意”起底“他人隐私(doxxing)、或鼓动攻击对方,都能构成犯罪。透过网络、社交媒体,贴大字报或派传单等公开他人隐私、企图导致受害者面对骚扰、恐慌或忧虑情况的行为,将构成刑事罪,并可能面对罚款或监禁。

Wife of grassroots leader in workers' dorm business, shows their Sentosa weekend "party home" to media

It was earlier reported that as of Wed (8 Apr) this week,…

【武汉冠状病毒】七旬确诊病患病危 女儿急求助吁康复者捐血浆

卫生部昨晚(3日)通告,新增的两起本地确诊病例中,其中一人为70岁的新加坡公民,在前日中午确诊。 不过,上述老翁的女儿Ashley Chung在脸书发文,急寻此前的康复病患,以参与目前国家传染病中心进行的血浆疗法试验,希望能找到对他的父亲等重症患者有帮助的血浆治疗。 上述老翁是第109例确诊病例,根据《联合早报》报导,老翁名为郑亚烈,送院时已出现肺部功能衰竭,确诊时已然病重,须依赖机器呼吸。 Ashley Chung在贴文称,有兴趣者可联系报业控股的医疗通讯员[email protected],至于捐赠者的身份都会保密。 据了解中国目前采用康复者血浆治疗重症病患,有取得初步成效。 新加坡全国传染病中心,正同陈笃生医院以及卫生科学局合作制定程序,让本地康复患者自愿捐赠血浆。 不过也有专家认为,当前大部分病患都靠自身免疫痊愈,未必是靠血浆治疗,再者并非所有康复者的血浆都能产生抗体。