Photo Credit: TODAY Online

On 30 January (Thursday), the Government announced that it will be distributing four surgical masks to all 1.3 households in Singapore. It explained that it will be handing out 5.2 million free masks progressively from 1 February via 89 community centres (CC) and 654 residents’ committee (RC) centres.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong also took to his Facebook on the same day to reiterate this information.

“Yesterday, we activated SAF, The People’s Association and other agencies to start preparing masks in special packs for Singaporeans. We want to ensure that every Singaporean who is unwell and needs a mask will have one,” he wrote.

PM Lee stated in his post that he understands people’s concerns and frustrations since they were not able to get hold of masks at retail stores.

He explained that although 5 million masks have been sent out to retailers in the last nine days, but the demand turned out to be higher than anticipated “given the recent rush all over Singapore to buy them”.

On Friday (24 January), the Ministry of Health (MOH) reassured the public that there were enough N95 masks in the country for the public. This announcement was made after several retail outlets ran out of both surgical and N95 masks that day following the confirmation of Singapore’s first Wuhan virus case.

However, since then, social media has been rife with comments from people in Singapore talking about how many retail outlets are still out of masks. On top of that, outlets with masks have to contend is growing queues.

Last week, Channel NewsAsia reported that a check showed that Guardian and Watsons stores in Paya Lebar Quarter, Clementi Mall and Tiong Bahru Plaza were out of the masks.

In PM Lee’s post, he reminded people to listen MOH’s advice that they will only need to wear a mask if they are feeling under the weather. “There is no need to wear a mask if we are well,” he wrote.

PM Lee noted that there will be a one-time distribution at Residents Committees (RC) and Community Centres (CC) in Singapore, and the public will need to bring their NRICs “to verify their addresses in order to collect one pack of four surgical masks per household”.

“People’s Association (PA) volunteers will help distribute masks to residents who are not able to go to the RCs and CCs themselves. We will post more details of the arrangements on RC notice boards and government social media channels,” he said.

He added, “Do heed the MOH advisories on when you should use a mask and how to properly handle one. Ensuring good personal hygiene and being socially responsible are our best protection against the virus.”

Upon reading this announcement, a large number of netizens thanked PM Lee and the Government for distributing the free masks. Under the comment section of his post, they said that they appreciate the kind gesture given that they are having a hard time trying to purchase the masks in retail outlets.

Despite being grateful, a large number of them pointed out that it would be better for the Government to distribute the masks via post.

This is because it will allow them to avoid being at a crowded place during collection, hence reducing their risks of contracting the deadly virus. Some added that it would be inconvenient for senior citizens to wait in a long queue to collect the free masks.

Given that masks distribution were done via mail during the 2003 SARS outbreak, some netizens question why it cannot be done the same way now.

  

Caroline Chiw suggests that the Government should “mandate that GPs give out at least one mask to patients who are genuinely unwell”. This is because she recently visited a reputed medical chain and was denied a mask even though her family member was down with cough and cold. She finds it “highly illogical” that a clinic does not supply a mask.

Separately, Facebook user Karen Ng Karen hopes that the government will set a maximum selling price for masks as some retailers have been selling them at “sky-high price”. “I hope government can set a maximum selling price for mask in this ‘panic period’, limit the amount of mask a person can purchase in a period (not a day inconvenient for some families) by register with purchaser ic/passport,” she wrote.

Other online users highlighted that the amount of free mask given by the Government – 4 masks per household – is too little. They said that some of them have more than four family members, hence making the amount distributed insufficient.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

前女佣拟对检控官 发起纪律研讯

因被前雇主廖文良指偷窃,卷入四年官司的印尼籍前女佣巴蒂,将透过代表律师,申请向涉及检控其案件的检控官,发起纪律研讯。 巴蒂代表律师阿尼尔(Anil Balchandani),今早(23日)出席在高庭的审前会议,这是援引律师专业法令(Legal Profession Act)第82A条文下,针对司法官员的纪律研讯(disciplinary proceeding)。 被要求答辩的是两名署理检控官 Tan Wee Hao和Tan Yanying,他们由总检察署的Kristy Tan Ruyan等人代表。…

Six things the government can reveal in the interest of protecting public trust but hasn't

If you’ve been following the case of the Singaporean single-mother who has…

陈清木痛心良好施政精神遭侵蚀 新加坡前进党致力改变政治版图

新加坡前进党创党人暨总秘书长陈清木今早召开记者会,公告媒体即将在下月3日举行的该党推介礼。席间他表示他已年届79岁不再年轻,服务选民26载、参与总统选举后原本打算推出政坛。 然而,他见今日之良好施政精神已渐乖离,对良好施政之根本,即透明、独立和问责逐渐被侵蚀,感到忧心且痛心,因为这三大根本,乃是建立政府与人民之间信任的基础。 “新加坡需要好的政治体制,即稳健的制衡(checks and balances)机制,这是新加坡人要看到的,希望我们依然能为我们的政府体制引以为傲。” 他说,作出开创新党的决定并不容易,但他走访基层和不同阶层国人见面,他们表达希望有可靠的替代政党之诉求,感到现今的体制并不均衡,因国会中压倒性的多数执政党,很容易趋向不考虑人民感受和长期后果,强推执政党的政策。 “所以有很多人和我谈、鼓励我,劝我不要保持沉默,应站出来召集肯为新加坡、人民服务的有志之士。”他忆述已故建国总理李光耀招他入行动党时,曾告知他:不想找YES MAN,而他也立志把家国人民摆在最前面,认为这是他的职责。 他表示新加坡前进党将致力改变政治版图,但没有大家的支持无法带来改变。他欣慰自号召党员以来,有许多勇敢儿女踊跃入党,而许多党中委都来自草根阶层,因为该党珍视来自广泛阶层的各界人士。 候选人将来自各阶层人士 “我可以告诉大家,我们的候选人选海纳百川,最重要的是大家的心在对的位置,我们需要不同背景、职务的人士-生意人、学者、社工、普通群众等等,只要有更多人站出来,恐惧的因素就会消失。” 他分享即便在过去也曾提出不受欢迎的异议,例如1999年当政府有意引进更多外来专才时,他提醒当时仍是不景时期,理应先保障国人的就业,结果杨荣文和李光耀都对他感到失望。…

Former ISA detainee Dr Lim Hock Siew issues challenge to Dr Tony Tan

Dr Lim Hock Siew, Singapore’s second longest-held political prisoner under the Internal…