(Image from Progress Party Singapore / Facebook)

On Tuesday (10 December) the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) calls for Courts of Singapore to be the authority that declares a piece of news as falsehood and impose corresponding penalties to ensure that POFMA is in line with the value of ‘independence’.
In a statement on their website, PSP emphasised that the party is founded on the tenets of transparency, independence and accountability which it feels the current POFMA “falls short”.
“Currently, POFMA empowers the Minister to declare a piece of news to be falsehood, without requiring any justification, criteria or standards,” said PSP.
“This does not measure up to the standards of Transparency and Accountability. And where the news involves the Government, it also fails the standard of Independence,” it added.
The party went on to outline three scenarios from which online falsehoods can arise starting with guesses made based on limited information due to facts, statistics and data not made readily available and accessible to the public. The second scenario involves negligence or failure of purveyors of news to fact-check; while the third involved the purveyor intentionally setting out to mislead their audience with deliberate falsehoods.
Agreeing that the government needs to act speedily in curbing the viral spread of fake news, PSP voiced its support on the need for Ministers to be empowered to demand that news purveyors post a link to a site which includes facts from the government in order “to swiftly stop the spread of misinformation”.
However, the party also said: “to declare any news as falsehood and to impose any penalties thereof, PSP is of the view that it should be done by the Courts of Singapore for Independence.”
The statement goes on to explain that the Courts have an established system and precedence for determining falsehoods given that it handles cases like fraud. This would ensure transparency and accountability, said PSP.
Currently, any minister is empowered to declare a statement as misleading or a false statement of fact and issue a correction order or takedown for that particular statement. The order can be challenged by the affected party by first appealing to the minister who issued the order. Once the minister rejects the appeal, the challenge can be brought to the High Court to either vary or cancel the order.
According to the provisions in POFMA, the High Court can only decide whether the statement declared by a minister to be false is, in fact, false. The Court cannot judge on whether the minister’s original declaration and/or order of removal was made ‘in the public interest’ as the law outlines.

PSP’s Brad Bowyer the first to be POFMA’d

On 25 November, PSP member Brad Bowyer was the first to receive a correction order issued under POFMA for a post he made on Facebook about government finances relating to investments. The order was issued upon the direction of Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Heng Swee Keat.
Complying with the order, Mr Bowyer included a statement to the top of the offending post to say that the post ‘contains false statement of facts’ and provided a link which led to the government’s ‘factually’ website which states the administration’s position on the statements Mr Bowyer made.
Following the correction, Mr Bowyer published another Facebook post explaining why he complied with the order. He said, “I have no problem in following that request as I feel it is fair to have both points of view and clarifications and corrections of fact when necessary.”
He added that he does his best to use public facts and make informed statements of opinions based on the details he has access to, saying that he does not have anything against being asked to make corrections or clarifications, especially in the public interest.
He then went on to express his personal feelings about POFMA, stating that he felt it was rushed through parliament and poses many opportunities for misuse despite the government’s assurances that that won’t happen.
Mr Bowyer said, “Indeed they said as much at the time in their public statements and I take them their word although I still feel the situation was not that urgent that a more considered piece of legislation could have been enacted after more vigorous debate and evaluation.”
He then added, “This will in no way impact my resolve or desire to do what I feel I can to improve our social and political discourse and how Singapore is governed and develops both now and in the future.”
“A responsible and vocal citizenry is as much a vital part of our democratic nation as is a responsible and listening government,” concluded Mr Bowyer.
A few days later after a second correction order was issued under POFMA – this time to States Times Review editor Alex Tan – Mr Bowyer noted that while he did comply with the correction order, that doesn’t mean he won’t appeal. He said, “Currently, I am still studying the final implementation of the legislation and its processes and so reserve my right to appeal at the appropriate time and in the appropriate manner.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

闭门会议谈话音频在网络疯传 新加坡中华总商会感失望

日前,贸工部长陈振声出席新加坡中华总商会(SCCCI)的一项闭门会议,不料会议上的谈话内容被录音,音频在网络疯传。 音频中可听见陈振声向与会者解说政府处理口罩问题面对的难处,期间更揶揄一小撮国人到超市疯抢日用品囤货、抢购口罩的行为“下衰”,认为是“白痴”(idiots)行径。 陈振声:开诚布公 不过对此陈振声则在个人脸书发文解释,这些商界领袖确实对当前武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情,以及政府采取的措施表示关注,有者也担忧游客减少和民间出现抢购的现象。 对此陈振声表示自己在现场提供“坦率的分析”,“那些曾与我闭门会议的人都知道,我陈述艰难事实和取舍时不会拐弯抹角。” “为了使我们能继续共同作出艰难决定,对所面临的挑战和机遇有共同的了解很重要。” “断章取义的流言” 他也认为与会者对于他开诚布公地对话表示赞许,也让他们对当前局势理解。 相信是意有所指,他提及在闭门会议要分享这类敏感议题,信任和保密很重要,“在艰难时期,断章取义的流言并无助于建立信任和群策群力。” 商会:已提醒与会者是闭门会议 另一方面,新加坡中华总商会也发表文告,证实该会会员是在本月10日,与陈振声进行闭门对话会。然而有关网络流传的音频是未经许可的情况下发布的,且该会早已提醒参与者,那是闭门和不记录的会议,此举已违反了诚信。 该会对于泄露音频者的行为感到“无法接受和失望”,也认为使得商会的声誉遭损,以及伤害了商会与陈振声部长多年来建立的信任。

HDB extends suspension of late payment charges on mortgage arrears till 31 March, 2021

In order to help ease the burden of the people of Singapore,…

$25,000 scam attempt foiled by remittance company

Samlit Moneychanger, a remittance company foiled a scam attempt on July 8,…

亲生父母涉虐死五岁儿 死者头部伤痕或源自猫笼

将一名1.05米的5岁男童,困在放置于住家单位内,只有91厘米长、58厘米宽、70厘米高的铁丝猫笼中,实在令人发指。而这行为仅仅是那5岁孩童的亲生父母,用于“管住”他的众多恐怖手法之一。 而这个铁丝猫笼,也成为了呈堂证据。 男童在被发现时,臀部和大腿上有曾被钳子反复夹伤的痕迹,其头部、手和腿有被扫帚等物打伤的痕迹,甚至遭到近乎沸腾热水烫伤身体。 最终,男童昏倒并被送入竹脚妇幼医院(KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital),发现他身上伤痕累累,包括有急性肾损伤、脸部多处撕裂伤、鼻骨骨折以及覆盖身体大部分面积的严重烧伤。 虽然院方尽力挽救这个年轻的生命,但是男童还是在入院的隔天,即2016年10月23日过世。 显示多个器官衰竭迹象 男童的父母,利兹万(Ridzuan Mega…