(Image from Progress Party Singapore / Facebook)

On Tuesday (10 December) the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) calls for Courts of Singapore to be the authority that declares a piece of news as falsehood and impose corresponding penalties to ensure that POFMA is in line with the value of ‘independence’.
In a statement on their website, PSP emphasised that the party is founded on the tenets of transparency, independence and accountability which it feels the current POFMA “falls short”.
“Currently, POFMA empowers the Minister to declare a piece of news to be falsehood, without requiring any justification, criteria or standards,” said PSP.
“This does not measure up to the standards of Transparency and Accountability. And where the news involves the Government, it also fails the standard of Independence,” it added.
The party went on to outline three scenarios from which online falsehoods can arise starting with guesses made based on limited information due to facts, statistics and data not made readily available and accessible to the public. The second scenario involves negligence or failure of purveyors of news to fact-check; while the third involved the purveyor intentionally setting out to mislead their audience with deliberate falsehoods.
Agreeing that the government needs to act speedily in curbing the viral spread of fake news, PSP voiced its support on the need for Ministers to be empowered to demand that news purveyors post a link to a site which includes facts from the government in order “to swiftly stop the spread of misinformation”.
However, the party also said: “to declare any news as falsehood and to impose any penalties thereof, PSP is of the view that it should be done by the Courts of Singapore for Independence.”
The statement goes on to explain that the Courts have an established system and precedence for determining falsehoods given that it handles cases like fraud. This would ensure transparency and accountability, said PSP.
Currently, any minister is empowered to declare a statement as misleading or a false statement of fact and issue a correction order or takedown for that particular statement. The order can be challenged by the affected party by first appealing to the minister who issued the order. Once the minister rejects the appeal, the challenge can be brought to the High Court to either vary or cancel the order.
According to the provisions in POFMA, the High Court can only decide whether the statement declared by a minister to be false is, in fact, false. The Court cannot judge on whether the minister’s original declaration and/or order of removal was made ‘in the public interest’ as the law outlines.

PSP’s Brad Bowyer the first to be POFMA’d

On 25 November, PSP member Brad Bowyer was the first to receive a correction order issued under POFMA for a post he made on Facebook about government finances relating to investments. The order was issued upon the direction of Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Heng Swee Keat.
Complying with the order, Mr Bowyer included a statement to the top of the offending post to say that the post ‘contains false statement of facts’ and provided a link which led to the government’s ‘factually’ website which states the administration’s position on the statements Mr Bowyer made.
Following the correction, Mr Bowyer published another Facebook post explaining why he complied with the order. He said, “I have no problem in following that request as I feel it is fair to have both points of view and clarifications and corrections of fact when necessary.”
He added that he does his best to use public facts and make informed statements of opinions based on the details he has access to, saying that he does not have anything against being asked to make corrections or clarifications, especially in the public interest.
He then went on to express his personal feelings about POFMA, stating that he felt it was rushed through parliament and poses many opportunities for misuse despite the government’s assurances that that won’t happen.
Mr Bowyer said, “Indeed they said as much at the time in their public statements and I take them their word although I still feel the situation was not that urgent that a more considered piece of legislation could have been enacted after more vigorous debate and evaluation.”
He then added, “This will in no way impact my resolve or desire to do what I feel I can to improve our social and political discourse and how Singapore is governed and develops both now and in the future.”
“A responsible and vocal citizenry is as much a vital part of our democratic nation as is a responsible and listening government,” concluded Mr Bowyer.
A few days later after a second correction order was issued under POFMA – this time to States Times Review editor Alex Tan – Mr Bowyer noted that while he did comply with the correction order, that doesn’t mean he won’t appeal. He said, “Currently, I am still studying the final implementation of the legislation and its processes and so reserve my right to appeal at the appropriate time and in the appropriate manner.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

毕业证书遭校方扣下 马国马大生恫言法律对付

马来亚大学土木工程系生兼马大新青年前主席黄彦铬在毕业典礼上举字报要求副校长阿都拉欣下台,引起校方不满报警对付,并且扣下他的成绩单和毕业证书。其代表律师要求校方在24小时内给出毕业证书和成绩单,否则将会采取法律行动对付。 黄彦铬昨日傍晚(10月16日)自八打灵再也警察局出来后,在代表律师阿西阿里的陪同下,举办新闻发布会。 阿西阿里指出,他们在录口供期间都和警方保持良好合作,所以在进行约一小时的录供后就可以离开。 黄彦铬并没做出侮辱行为 他表示,据警方透露已经接获十个针对黄彦铬的投报,因此警方依据刑事法典第504条文,即故意侮辱他人、蓄意破坏安宁条文来展开调查。 但是,阿西阿里强烈反对有关的指控,并表示他的客户只是做出批评,并没有任何人身攻击或用词粗俗来侮辱人。 “他只是为了强调自己的立场,并没有任何具有侮辱性的字眼,因此不应该如此被对待。” 阿西阿里也指出,黄彦铬昨日中午到大学归还毕业袍,欲领取毕业证书和成绩单时,大学办公室秘书处指黄彦铬的成绩单在打印时弄脏了,还没有准备新的交给他。 这令黄彦铬质疑大学有意扣下他的毕业证和成绩单。 “当我请他们展示被弄脏的成绩单时,对方无法拿出来。当我问他们是否要扣下我的成绩单时,他们都表示不清楚。” 强调校方无权不给出证件 针对此事,阿西阿里强调,世界上没有任何大学能够在学生,一没有被证实犯罪、二没涉及任何丑闻的情况下,拒绝颁发大学毕业证书和成绩单给学生。…

MND: Town councils to set aside at least 14% of S&CC collection for lift replacement funds

Beginning on 1 April 2017, all town councils have to set aside…

How far should MPs go for a cause?

In the last six months, Member of Parliament for Moulmein-Kallang GRC, Denise…

【选举】民主党准候选人高梅兹:政府抗疫紧急措施现失策

续张恩敏和陈威儒之后,新加坡民主党介绍了准候选人高梅兹,后者遗憾指出,我国在面对冠状病毒19疫情来袭时,在紧急措施上犯下了很多失误。却又在防疫时期仓促举办大选。 他指出,冠毒来袭不仅影响了我国的经济活动和社会交流,更影响人们在塑造新加坡未来上的政治活动。他指出,目前国人所面对的问题包括了生活成本上涨、人口密度、医疗保健和房屋负担能力、贫困和财富不平等、社会保障以及薄弱的退休金制度。 因此,他鼓励民众趁着选举,选出对的人民代表,将人们的声音直接传达到国会中,为国家塑造尽一份力。