Preeti and Subhas Nair performing at the PinkDot Rally 2019. (Photo: Rachel Ng, Source: Pink Dot SG)

“When you imply someone is a liar and call someone a racist, you are giving license to everyone in Singapore to call these people those same words,” says rapper Subhas Nair.
In an interview with VICE journalist Eduardo Liotta, Singaporean influencer Preeti Nair and her rapper brother Subhas Nair talked about the recent ‘brownface’ scandal which resulted in the pair being slapped with a two year conditional probation by the police.
After seeing an ad by E-Pay which featured Chinese-Singaporean actor Dennis Chew portraying four different characters including an Indian man for which he donned artificially darkened skin, the duo put out a rap video.
The video, which featured a remix of Iggy Azalea’s “Fuck It Up”, drew attention to the issue of discrimination in Singapore society, specifically calling out the majority Chinese for exploiting minorities for financial gain.
Subhas explained in the interview that the E-Pay ad was cultural appropriation and exploitation, but this time on a corporate level. He felt that he “couldn’t let it go”, which is why the pair decided to release the video.
Preeti told VICE that the video blew up on social media while she was on a flight to Bali. By the time she landed, she found out that the video has gone viral and was now being investigated by the police.

Giving license for racism

One contentious point of this whole scandal was the duo’s first apology which was a spoof of the apology put out by the company behind the controversial ad, Havas.
Preeti and Subhas used similar language to Havas’ apology and didn’t miss the chance to throw some shade, again shining a light on the issue of discrimination.
The government, however, was not impressed. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) quickly released a statement to condemn the rap video, describing the lyrics as “blatantly false” and claiming it was racists against the Chinese in Singapore.
“This spoofing is a pretence of an apology, and in fact shows contempt for the many Singaporeans who expressed concern at their blatantly racist rap video,” said MHA.
Subhas said to VICE: “When a ministry releases a public statement, what kind of license does it give people? When you imply someone is a liar and call someone a racist, you are giving license to everyone in Singapore to call these people those same words.”
Explaining why they chose to mirror Havas’ apology, Preeti said ”It’s been a lifetime of shitty apologies from people who have painted their face brown, it’s been so exhausting. I wasn’t going to let another shitty corporate apology go.”
Subhas added that he wasn’t keen on apologising to begin with as he considers it his duty to stand up for things like this. “It’s the most hip-hop thing to do, to use music to get people thinking, talking, and questioning power,” he explained.

The slippery slope goes both ways

The release of the video sparked a national-level debate about racism and the social divide between ethnicities in multi-cultural and multi-racial Singapore where the majority race is Chinese.
On whether they were expecting the video to have such a big impact, Preeti said that she thought people would like it because “it’s a catching song and it speaks the truth”. However, she wasn’t hoping for any specific outcome, adding “I call out a lot of bullshit, so it was normal.”
Subhas, on the other hand, said he did it for his people. He explained, “I did this for people who look like me who may not be able to articulate their anger and frustration; those who needed a soundtrack to that feeling. They needed to know that artists like Preeti and myself are always going to use our platforms.”
The rapper continued, “When I spoke to the police, I told them, “If we didn’t have a song like this, it could have been a lot worse. The slippery slope can go down both ways. It’s not fair that you get to determine which side it goes.” You can’t say this will lead to hundreds of videos, when this could also have become something actually dangerous if we did not have a tension release like this… this shit builds up.”
In a statement, the police said that investigations were launched after reports were filed against the duo’s video, noting that “The video was in clear contravention of the Penal Code. If this video were to be allowed, then similar expletive-laden, insulting, offensive videos, targeted at all communities will have to be allowed.”
Talking about the investigation process itself, Subhas and Preeti said they spent hours in the police station answering questions. While Preeti was in Bali, Subhas spent 4-5 hours in the police station on the day the video went out, giving them a lyric breakdown.
He cheekily told VICE, “I was called down to the police station and they asked me for a lyric breakdown of the song. I told them I usually charge for a lyric breakdown, but I’m trying to avoid a charge, so I’ll do this free of charge.”
When Preeti arrived back in Singapore, she was held at the airport for close to an hour as the police verified details of her trip to Bali. The next day, she said, she and Subhas spent 9 hours being questioned at a police station about their intentions behind the video, who came up with the ideas, and explanations about what it all meant.
“I had to explain each lyric and visual, and sometimes, the visual was us pointing a middle finger and I had to explain what it meant,” she said.

Western influence over Singaporean issues

The interviewer then delved into what the pair thinks about those who say they are influenced by politics in America. Preeti explained, “I don’t think this song would have existed if I wasn’t in Singapore. So it’s very [unfair] to immediately try and disassociate from it and be like “Oh it has to be because of the pop culture references and the West references. We didn’t teach this in school so we don’t know where Preeti and Subhas learned this from.”
Preeti added that she also despises the argument that ‘brownface’ is a Western phenomenon.
“Like sure, the conceptual idea originated in America, but the act of painting yourself a different skin colour is fucked up,” she said.
“Can we acknowledge that? Whether it’s blackface, brownface, yellowface or whiteface, it’s whack. You can’t say brownface is not a Singaporean thing. You are making it a Singaporean thing by doing it.”
Subhas then chimed in with an similar argument of how people don’t seem to mind when local radio stations ‘borrow from the West’ given that their airplay is American pop music.
Later, Subhas described what it’s like being a minority in Singapore and how some people do not speaking up about discrimination or racism they’ve experienced:
“It’s scary being the only brown person in a Chinese dominant space, and there are far too many spaces like that. If someone is coming up after this and saying ‘I face this and this but I don’t speak about it. Why should you?’ then you are complicit in your oppression.”
Though he added that it’s ok to not say anything, acknowledging that there are power and privilege asymmetries between brown people too.
He went on to say, “I grew up hating my Indian-ness because there was not much for me to look up to and aspire to be. Today, I’m living my best life because I love my sister, my mom, myself. I have forgiven myself and those around me. So by just existing and creating, we are fighting something bigger than us.”
That, he says, is why they made the second, more sincere apology.
“It was unfair to the allies and to those standing in solidarity fighting those online battles.”
When asked what they’ve learnt from this experience, Subhas said that justice has to be redefined in Singapore, adding that the way forward starts with dialogue.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

徐顺全录华语视频 吁选民拒绝与民生脱节领袖

“这就是行动党的“pattern”(模式),选举前作出很多承诺,选举后才把账单寄给你,要你买单。” 续广东话、福建话和潮州话,民主党秘书长徐顺全这次录制华语视频,面向国内受中文教育的选民。 在视频中他重申,人民行动党在上届选举作出承诺,要帮助老一辈选民;不过选举后又宣布调涨消费税;新加坡人士全球生活费用最高昂的城市之一,面对财务压力、工资被压抑等问题,但行动党仍执意调涨消费税和其他各种费用。 他也呼吁民众应拒绝让那些和民生脱节的政治人物,继续制定政策影响人们的生活。他认为很多部长不理解许多普通老百姓,在全球生活成本最高昂都会里的生活和挣扎。 另外,他也重申民主党的政策献议,包括提高奢侈品消费税而不是日常用品、归还公积金、避免医疗保健商业化等。 此前,徐顺全以方言发表政见,得以让一些籍贯选民倍感亲切,有者认为此举也更适合用来拉近与老一辈选民的距离。  

Hong Kong District Court fines Singapore-based shipping agent APL and Chinese captain HK$99,000, sentences captain to three-months’ suspended imprisonment

The District Court of Hong Kong has found Singapore-based shipping agent APL…

“非丧失能力至无法工作” 心脏衰竭中年男申请提出公积金被拒

采访:许渊臣  报导整理:北雁 “我不是要跟政府讨福利金,只是想拿出我自己的钱自救都不行,我感到无助,新加坡政府怎么了?” 拿不起超过五公斤的物品,外出四小时就会感到身体疲累,站了15分钟就会开始头晕。患有心脏衰竭,左心室只剩下37巴仙功能的沈佳泉,想向中央公积金局申请领取公积金以支持日后的开销时,当局却以他不符合资格为由,拒绝其申请。 事件主人公,56岁的沈佳泉之前曾工作一段时间,也有3000新元收入,但是在2014年开始,他的身体健康状况出现了问题。 手术后无法长时间工作 那时起他开始翻覆发烧,有时体温甚至烧到摄氏40度;身体也容易感到疲惫,走路或久站都会气喘吁吁。 起初还不以为意,一直到一次在太太陪同下要过天桥去找中医检查时,差点因为喘不过气而昏厥,才惊觉身体状况已出问题;中医建议沈佳泉立即去于医院检查。医生指他的心脏出现衰竭现象,也建议他进行手术。 正常人的左心室射出率(LVEF)在55至70巴仙,但手术后就只剩37巴仙,且不能提重物,否则心脏会痛。“医生要我把一切都放慢下来,不能做太激烈的运动。” 他在手术的两年后,重新开始工作,也尝试了开私召车等兼职工作,但是因为心脏问题,也无法赚取过多收入。在2017年已停止工作。 仅靠妻子工作收入 经济拮据…

让患病送餐员回家休息 网友义务帮忙送餐

网友在路上碰见生病的送餐员,表示要送他回家,但是送餐员执意完成订单,因此热心网友就“好人做到底”,将送餐员送回家,并帮助他把订单送到。 他也希望透过分享此事,能够取得社会共鸣,多关心和体谅类似送餐员工作之不易。 署名Kelvin tay的网友今天(6月4日)在Instagram群组sgfollowsall上帖文指出,他是在送了孩子上学的回程路上,碰见了该名生病的送餐员。 他指出,当时看到送餐员骑士,连人带车跌倒在地,于是趋前查看,发现送餐员脸色苍白且手脚冰冷,询问后才知道他肚子疼。网友在帮忙扶起摩托车后,就劝送餐员回家休息,但是送餐员表示要在回家前,把最后的订单送到。 基于送餐员坚持,网友就表示愿意帮忙送餐,才成功把送餐员劝回家。 他在帖文中写到,他将送餐员护送回家后,也将餐点送到指定地点了,还附上照片。   View this post on…