Photo credit: Nuria Ling/TODAY

On Tuesday (17 September), a couple was charged for murder after their two-and-a-half-year-old daughter’s body was discovered in a Chee Swee Road HDB rental flat last week.
The 31-year-old man and 30-year-old woman are the biological parents of the toddler, and they have allegedly killed the girl in March 2014. If convicted, the pair faces the death penalty.
The police found the female toddler’s remains in a metal pot last Tuesday (10 September) after they received a call for assistance at about 8.30pm, the Straits Times (ST) reported.
Chinese-language newspaper Lianhe Wanbao said that police officers left the one-room rental flat on the eight storey of the block with a mental pot and a bag.
ST added that neighbours disclosed that a week before the body was found in the unit, they smelled a strong stench – with one describing it as “something rotting” – lingering through the corridor.
If that’s not all, residents in the block also noted that a man in his 20s had be staying in the flat all by himself for the last three or four months, and a couple with a child stayed there before him, ST said.
It is understood that the man was present in the flat when the police arrived last Tuesday. However, it is not known how he is related to the couple.
The police said that the duo have been remanded since June 2018 for other unrelated offences. Court records shows that the man has three pending charges, and one of them is for rioting with four others on 5 April 2018. It is believed that he punched, kicked and used a helmet to hit another man.
In addition, he was also charged for another case where he failed to return to a community supervision centre on 13 February last year, after leave was granted for him to be hired at a food supplies company from November 2017 to April 2018.
Moreover, he allegedly also took methamphetamine, despite being admitted to the Drug Rehabilitation Centre twice before, in 2011 and 2016, for abusing drugs. The cases are still pending.
On the other hand, the woman was sentenced to five years and two months in prison for drug and theft charges on 9 September (Monday).
The couple are married and has at least three children. They are also the registered occupants of the flat where the police made the gruesome discovery. The couple’s names are not made public due to a gag order.
A spokesperson from the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) told TODAY that it’s confirmed that the couple has other children, “all of whom are under stable alternative care arrangements”.
“MSF will continue to provide the necessary support to ensure the children’s safety and welfare”, noted the spokesperson.
The couple are being remanded at the Central Police Division for a week to assist in the investigations. Their case will be heard again on 24 September.

Why was the girl’s body not discovered sooner?

It is no surprise that most people will wonder why the toddler’s body was not found earlier. Her murder happened five years ago and the police only made the discovery last week.
Liew Kai Khiun, Assistant Professor at Nanyang Technological University, wrote a letter to TODAY and said that the issue that remains puzzling is the fact that the girl’s absence remained unnoticed for the last five years.
He explained that the police or Central Narcotics Bureaus should have suspected something while the couple was being investigated for their drug offences and other criminal charges.
“Or by the Health Ministry when vaccinations of the child were discontinued, and finally, the Education Ministry when the child was to have reached schooling age under the Compulsory Education Act,” he wrote.
If that’s not all, we can’t help wonder how the child’s Primary 1 registration was not checked, given that she would have been seven-and-a-half-year-old this year if she was still alive. On top of that, the investigations of the two suspects should have also revealed something suspicious as the police should have questioned them on their family background.
Why didn’t the police hear of the child from other individuals during their course of investigation?
Although Mr Liew understand that the case is still under investigation, but he pointed out that it’s obvious that this little girl had “fallen through the cracks of our system”. He also suggested that this case shows that there’s an “urgent need for otherwise separate government agencies to tighten their processes and co-ordination when it comes to handling vulnerable families and children”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MINDEF’s new argument against Ben Davis: He will go AWOL if we defer his NS

MINDEF yesterday (18 Jul) now said that it rejected teenage footballer Ben…

“是时候放手啦” 老报人吁政府放宽对本地媒体钳制

资深老报人巴吉尔(PN Balji)认为,政府是时候放手对媒体的钳制,也直言,即使新加坡自诩第一世界国家、第一世界社会,却没有与其第一世界身份相符的媒体。 本月13日,工人党青年团举办网络讲座会,探讨后冠病时代的新加坡,巴吉尔也是主讲人之一。 他也是英语媒体《新報》(The New Paper)与《今日报》前主编。他谈及政府在各种层次对本地媒体的钳制,这包括要想办报,就得申请准证,而且只为期一年,而且如果拒绝更新准证,政府也没有义务解释理由。 1970年代,在《报纸与印刷出版法令》下推行报章改制,各报须由公众持股重组成为上市公司,确保报章不由单一人士或公司所拥有。然而,巴吉尔也指出,“魔鬼藏在细节里”,政府引入股权结构,需出让三巴仙股份,而持股者可能会必须一切代价捍卫政府权益。 再者,控制不仅来自法律层面,有好些行动党政府前内阁部长,都当过报业控股董事会主席,包括林金山、前总统陈庆炎、纳丹等人。即便现任主席李文献也曾当过部长;报业控股总裁伍逸松,也是军伍出身,是武装部队第五任三军总长,中将军衔,2007年退伍后担任东方海皇集团主席暨总裁,2017年则接任报业控股总裁至今。 巴吉尔坦言,对媒体的操控是广泛的,甚至达到任命谁当董事会主席,“我不确定什么时候就连委任编辑也要干预。” “出格”的编采人付出惨重代价 巴吉尔忆述,曾有一次已故建国总理李光耀,向编辑们抱怨某一张照片,“当时他还是总理,他质问编辑们到底想怎样?想把他拉下台吗?因为这就是英国媒体对前英相威尔逊(Harol Wilson)所做的事。”…

Greenpeace: Only five out of 23 tuna canneries in Southeast Asia make the grade on sustainability

Greenpeace Southeast Asia released its latest tuna cannery ranking evaluating 23 canneries…

Applications for COVID-19 Recovery Grant for low-, middle-income workers and self employed open till 2 July

Applications for a one-time payout of up to S$700 for lower- to…