In response to a question about government spending on scholarships and tuition grants for foreign students, Minister of Education Mr Ong Ye Kung said, “The core objective of our education system is to serve the needs of Singaporeans and no Singaporean is ever displaced from an institute of Higher Learning (IHL) because of international students.”
However, using the National University of Singapore (NUS) as an example, we can see that from its website that it clearly states limited vacancies in the institute due to facilities and student-to-faculty ratio for each academic year.
The website says:
“All undergraduate courses in NUS have limited vacancies. This ensures that we have sufficient facilities to support our students and maintain an optimal student-to-faculty ratio for effective teaching.”

The NUS website also provides a breakdown of the number of male and female undergraduate and postgraduate students in each academic year by course, but does not specify a breakdown of the international-local student ratio.
But if we take a look at the data on the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) website, QS notes that 7,645 out of 30,049 students in NUS are international students. Now, NUS has not disputed the figures stated by QS, since the university spokesperson was quoted in June saying that the QS ranking shows that the effort the institute has made in research and education is being highlighted.
Even so, when we look at the total number of students in NUS for the 2018/2019 academic year, it is a little higher than the QS figure, at about 39,923 students. Specifically, NUS say they have 30,093 undergraduates and 10793 post graduate students. Now, based on the slight difference in the total number of students noted by QS and NUS, we can estimate that NUS’s actual number of international students might be a little higher than QS’s figure.
All this to say, there are a limited number of spots in NUS with about 25% (calculated using figures from QS) going to international students. This ratio is similar to the ratio of international students to local students recorded by QS in Nanyang Technological University and Singapore Management University.
Given that we know there are a fixed number of spots in universities like NUS due to limited facilities, we can safely say that with each international student being enrolled as a student, a local student is deprived of his or her chance to obtain a degree from the local universities.
In the same Parliamentary session, Mr Ong also noted that the international students hoping to attend universities in Singapore are subject to a higher standard of admissions. He said, “In fact the process is that you apply to attend the university, you must meet a standard which is a higher one than for locals.”
But when we look at the NUS qualification standards for local and international students, we see that isn’t always the case.
For a fair comparison, we’ll take a look at the admission requirements for an international student with A Level qualification compared to that of a Singapore student with Singapore-Cambridge GCE A Level. We’re comparing these as A Levels are a recognised international qualification.
For international students applying to NUS, they need ‘a good pass in at least 3 A Level subjects’. Apart from that, they do not need SAT Subject Tests, English qualifications such as IELTS, or university entrance examinations.
On the other hand, local students need good results in three A Level subjects, Knowledge Inquiry (KI) or General Paper (GP), an A Level project work and meet the mother tongue language (MTLL) requirement (a minimum grade of O for the MTLL paper).

So as you can see, a Singapore student has to jump through more hoops to qualify for a spot in NUS compared to an international student. Not only are they competing for limited spots with Singaporeans, they have to do more to prove themselves to the universities.
Therefore, how can the minister say that Singaporean students are not deprived of a space in local universities by international students who receive scholarships or tuition grants?

Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

5 Minutes With… Leong Sze Hian on NTUC discounts

TOC spends 5 minutes with Leong Sze Hian discussing the NTUC’s U-Stretch vouchers for poorer Singaporeans.


日前,世界各地传出有康复者二次感染的症状,包括香港、荷兰、比利时等。对此,上海复旦大学附属华山医院感染科主任张文宏表示,人类短期内难以通过疫苗达到群体免疫,故即使疫苗面世,在未来数年内仍须保持常态化的防疫态势。 继香港传出全球首宗二次感染的病例后,荷兰及比利时各有一名康復患者再度染疫,引发全球关注。此次二次感染患者包括香港33岁男子,于四月中康复出院,惟本月欧洲旅游后,再对病毒呈阳性;荷兰的二次感染患者为一名老人,其免疫系統虛弱;而比利时一名女子则在首次确诊后,三个月左右再度染疫。 对此,上海复旦大学附属华山医院感染科主任张文宏表示,人类短期内难以通过疫苗达到群体免疫,而且针对香港出现的二次感染病例,指该病例是个别案例,非一般意义上的复阳,需进一步观察再感染患者是否成为常态。 张文宏也表示,再感染关乎免疫的持久性,也关乎未来疫苗保护的时间和重复接种的间歇时间。全球目前有2千200多万人曾感染,假如再感染成立,那么在冠病高发和流行地区,再感染或成为常态。不过他也指出,目前四种较常见的冠病病毒,感染后免疫时间都超过4个月。 而荷兰病毒专家科普曼斯则表示,早已预料会有二次感染,认为要观察有关情况是否经常发生。比利时病毒专家范德兰斯特则指,女患者两次感染的病毒菌株差异,“足以称得上是不同的病毒株”。 他解释,这名患者首次确诊时只有轻微症状,“那么你身体产生的抗体较少,不足以保护你免受第二次感染”。

站15楼走廊通风口 女子试图自杀获救

是一时想不开吗?义顺发生跳楼案,一名身穿绿色上衣黑短裤的女子站在15楼的走廊通风口,出动警察和民防部队,所幸在最后一刻,警员及时将女子拉回走廊,避免悲剧发生。 署名Kent Kwek的网友昨午(6月10日)发帖,上传了一段女子试图跳楼视频,发生在义顺第805栋组屋的15楼层。 视频中可见女子站在走廊通风口外部,试图跳下,而警员和新加坡民防部队人员进行劝导。 另一方面,民防部队人员也在楼下准备急救器材等,以备不时之需。 视频中忽然听到女子尖叫,警员等不负使命,成功抓住了女子的袖子,随后将拉回走廊。我国在去年5月废除自杀罪。 如自身或发现身边有陷入情绪困境,或自杀倾向的亲友民众,可直接拨打新加坡援人协会(SOS)24小时热线:1800-221-4444 求助热线: 新加坡援人协会(SOS): 1800 221 4444…