Photo: MP Indranee’s Facebook

At a dialogue held by the National University of Singapore’s Social Service Research Centre yesterday (18 Jul), Second Minister for Education Indranee Rajah told the audience that the Singapore’s 4G leadership will continue to strengthen support for those who have less, and strive to ensure all have opportunities to improve their lives so as to tackle inequality.
“As Singaporeans, we must care for one another and look out for one another. Every Singaporean matters and we want all to do well,” she said.
“Singapore must always be a society of opportunities for all, throughout life, where everyone can progress irrespective of starting point; where all Singaporeans will have equal chance to seek better lives – to meet their aspirations and find happiness – regardless of background.”
Tackling inequality is also a matter of national interest, she said.
A member of the audience later told her he had noticed that quite a number of Singaporeans from low-income families are “gig” workers doing freelance work. This deprives them of benefits such as annual leave and Central Provident Fund contribution, and as a result, many face difficulties securing housing or planning for retirement, he said.
“Because like you, we are quite concerned with the gig economy which gives a kind of short-term income but, like you point out, it doesn’t build up your retirement reserves,” Ms Indranee replied.
She said those who cannot secure more permanent employment can go for trainings. They can be helped through schemes like SkillsFuture and Adapt and Grow, she said.
“For those who are at a young age now, what you really hope is that when they become older, by the time they retire, they won’t be in a position where their reserves are low. So we’ll have to try and figure out a way to help them build up their reserves” she said.
Middle-income Singaporeans are also doing freelance “gig” work too
While Ms Indranee and her 4G team are trying to figure out a way to help low-income “gig” workers to build up their retirement reserves, it has been noticed that middle-income Singaporeans are increasing being forced to do freelance “gig” work too, especially those PMETs who have been retrenched.
Take for example, Shaun Ow, 39, who was working in the private sector for some 11 years in various industries before he was retrenched 4-5 years ago. He then tried to find a job for more than a year before giving up. He ended up driving Grab to make ends meet.
He told the media that he has been a private hire car driver for the last three-and-a-half years and manages to earn about $5,000 a month, after accounting for rental, fuel and other miscellaneous charges. But he has to work very hard, driving everyday for 12 to 14 hours non-stop. On average, he would be making 20 to 25 trips daily.
“Passengers sometimes think our job is easy – sitting in an air-conditioned environment is easy. But I always tell them: You find one weekend, have two one-hour breaks for lunch and dinner, and sit in a comfortable sofa for 12 hours just watching TV. You will feel sore backs, sore shoulders, sore necks, sore everywhere,” he said.
And of course, Mr Ow would not have any CPF contributions as a Grab driver.
No use going for trainings if government continues to “open door” for “foreign talents”
Some time ago, Prof Walter Theseira, an economist at the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS), noted that the take-home pay for private hire car drivers is “competitive” with the many entry-level jobs for educated younger workers. But he said that having a large number of young people driving Grab for the long term raises some issues.
“The jobs offer no career path and do not provide workers with significant marketable skills. This means that workers in such jobs will inevitably end up disadvantaged compared to their peers who are able to stay in jobs that offer a career path and the opportunity to build marketable skills,” he added.
“If workers are attracted to private hire driving and other ‘gig’ economy jobs and spend too long in them early on, their lifetime wages and career opportunities could be harmed significantly.”
“What we should really think about is why many of the jobs that employ our NITEC and poly diploma holders pay comparably or worse than the earnings achievable by gig economy workers. This doesn’t make any economic sense because NITEC and diploma holders actually have extensive training to perform a particular skilled job,” Prof Theseira further noted.
“These are workers who have received two to three years of specialist training. Why does the market pay them the same or less than a gig economy platform does for a job that requires virtually no training whatsoever?”
Actually, Minister Indranee and Prof Theseira don’t need to look far for an answer. It is embedded inside the MOM data:

Because the market can get cheaper “foreign talents” to work in companies, which helps to depress the salaries of Singaporeans, even if they have received two to three years of “specialist training” or whatever SkillsFuture trainings.
As long as the government continues to open the door for planeloads of foreigners to work in Singapore, more Singaporeans would be forced to do freelance “gig” work, which of course, would not help to contribute any cents towards their CPF account for retirement.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

18 staff of Tan Tock Seng hospital to get disciplinary action for failing to complete the final step of sterilisation

Counselling and disciplinary action, which include warnings and financial penalties, will be…

预留停车位给部长出席校园活动 民众质问何不停在组屋区

一名民众向“网络公民”爆料,教育部长王乙康出席兰景中学(OPSS)种族和谐日活动,校方在活动前一天,就特地把停车位预留给部长及随行的北区督学,学校教职员则被指示停在别处。他质疑校园停车收费未能公平执行。 这名不愿具名的民众提供照片,显示一大清早,有一排停车位已被预留。其中一辆车牌号码SCH4800D轿车,遭眼尖网民鉴定认出乃王乙康座乘。两年前,同一辆轿车曾被网民踢爆,违规堵塞于国家图书馆的消防车出入口。 这名民众质问,既然部长有缴特别年费,在执行公务时可停车在建屋局组屋,而最近的组屋停车场仅在咫尺之遥,为何还需特别礼遇,让部长尊驾占用校园内的停车位。 教师缴停车费制度将在下月1日落实,但有别于高等学府,中学校园不设收费闸栏,教育部表示这是为了“减低行政工作和成本”,只由校方根据发放的停车印花,确保访客和教职员停在制定的停车位。 这意味着,所有在校园工作者,包括所有教职员、食堂经营者、经常到校处理事务的书商、校外教练等,都得购买印花,缴交停车月费。但是,学校访客(例如部长)却不会被征收费用。 访客无需付费,但是所有教职员却需要为停车位买单。 裸薪制度只落实在教师身上,但是教育部督学等高职,却不受管制。马林百列集选区议员谢建平就曾批评基于“裸薪”准则,向教职员征收停车费是“可笑且羞辱老师”的。 早前,国会议员被揭发每年仅需付365元的特别停车年费,就能在新加坡全境的建屋发展局(HDB)组屋停车位和国会停车,相当于每天只需付1元。 今年8月起,教育部属下360所中小学和初级学院,教职员需缴付停车费,教育部长王乙康估计,每年预计可征收800-1千万元的停车收费,款项将悉数纳入学校资金。 事缘在2015年总审计署报告反映,有几所大专学府的停车费低于市价,认为这类做法等同“隐藏津贴”,不符合公共部门“裸薪”标准。 教师被要求每个月为有盖停车位付100元,露天停车位则为75元,至于学校假期减少为15元。部长表示,这些收费将转入学校基金。 王乙康亲自回应谢建平的批评,并回应遵从“裸薪”原则的必要。…

Ministerial Salary – It’s not (just) about the Money

~by: Tan Yin Hoe~ The Ministerial salary issue, says Prime Minister Lee…

Minister Lawrence Wong “had a good laugh” after seeing MTF press conference meme

Finance Minister Lawrence Wong “had a good laugh” after coming across one…