Workers cross road in downtown Singapore from

It was recently reported in the media that a young Singaporean in his late 20s lost his engineering job and was unable to secure another job.

Feeling hopeless, he holed himself up at home, mostly playing computer games and eventually developed the “hikikomori” syndrome.

The term “hikikomori” was coined by Japanese psychologist Tamaki Saitoō in the late 1990s, referring to those who experience physical isolation, social avoidance and psychological distress for six months or longer. There are often underlying psychological tendencies, such as low self-esteem and perceived social rejection, said Singaporean researcher Liew Kong Meng.

As a result, the Singaporean man did not leave his house for 3 years and became a social recluse. He would even cut his own hair so as to avoid going out for haircuts. All these while, he was supported by his wife, who worked as a clerk.

Eventually, his wife got fed-up and divorced him last year.

On the other hand, other young working Singaporeans who lost their job and couldn’t find one end up driving Grab.

44% of licensed private hire car drivers are young working Singaporeans

Last month in Parliament, Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan was asked to disclose the breakdown of the current number of taxi drivers and private hire car drivers by their respective age groups. Minister Khaw replied that as of February this year, there are about 41,000 Private Hire Car Driver’s Vocational Licence (PDVL) holders and 99,900 Taxi Driver’s Vocational Licence (TDVL) holders.

The age breakdown is as follows:

In other words, some 44% of licensed private hire car drivers fell into the age group of 20-39 years old.

Shaun Ow, 39, was working in the private sector for some 11 years in various industries before he was retrenched 4-5 years ago. He then tried to find a job for more than a year before giving up. He ended up driving Grab to make ends meet.

He told the media that he has been a private hire car driver for the last three-and-a-half years and manages to earn about $5,000 a month, after accounting for rental, fuel and other miscellaneous charges. But he has to work very hard, driving everyday for 12 to 14 hours non-stop. On average, he would be making 20 to 25 trips daily.

“Passengers sometimes think our job is easy – sitting in an air-conditioned environment is easy. But I always tell them: You find one weekend, have two one-hour breaks for lunch and dinner, and sit in a comfortable sofa for 12 hours just watching TV. You will feel sore backs, sore shoulders, sore necks, sore everywhere,” he said.

“We always have to be alert, vigilant (of) traffic. We can be very careful, but traffic is always moving with motorists, pedestrians and now with PMDs (personal mobility devices) – that is a lot of grief.”

Prof: How come pay of our diploma holders with specialized training worse than those achieved by ‘gig’ economy workers?

Source: The Straits Times

Prof Walter Theseira, an economist at the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS), noted that the take-home pay for private hire car drivers is “competitive” with the many entry-level jobs for educated younger workers.

But he said that having a large number of young people driving Grab for the long term raises some issues.

“The jobs offer no career path and do not provide workers with significant marketable skills. This means that workers in such jobs will inevitably end up disadvantaged compared to their peers who are able to stay in jobs that offer a career path and the opportunity to build marketable skills,” he added.

“If workers are attracted to private hire driving and other ‘gig’ economy jobs and spend too long in them early on, their lifetime wages and career opportunities could be harmed significantly.”

“What we should really think about is why many of the jobs that employ our NITEC and poly diploma holders pay comparably or worse than the earnings achievable by gig economy workers. This doesn’t make any economic sense because NITEC and diploma holders actually have extensive training to perform a particular skilled job,” Prof Theseira further noted.

“These are workers who have received two to three years of specialist training. Why does the market pay them the same or less than a gig economy platform does for a job that requires virtually no training whatsoever?”

Actually, Prof Theseira doesn’t need to look far for an answer. It is embedded inside the MOM data:

Because the market can get cheaper “foreign talents” to work in companies, helping to depress the salaries of our NITEC and poly diploma holders even if they have received two to three years of “specialist training”. As an economist, Prof Theseira should be quite familiar with the concept of demand and supply.


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

港学生参与“反送中”集会 带书复习应考

香港政府此前宣布修订《逃犯条例》,香港人民就持续以“反送中”为口号召开联署、罢课、游行、包围立法会等行动,反对草案通过。6月9日是103万人民上街示威,接连发生港警以武力镇压示威者,导致警民冲突,氛围开始产生变化,6月16日的第三波游行更是以约200万人上街示威,誓言要撤回《逃犯条例》。 其中各个年龄层都有参与示威活动,而令人意外的是,此次示威活动有大规模的香港学生加入,当中也出现一些有趣和温馨的现象。根据网站reddit爆料,香港学生在示威期间仍坚守学习,由于正值考试期间,许多学生身着黑衣,手拿课文继续复习,此一现象震惊许多网民,表示正在抗议期间仍坚守考试。 这也不是第一次香港学生在示威期间复习考试,根据《CNN》报道,香港在2014年的雨伞革命时,为香港学生提供学习区域,让他们能够同时进行示威与复习。 中学生反送中无碍考试 此外,根据港媒《香港01》采访,示威期间仍见中学生前来集会,许多学生在考试后便前往集会,或发起罢课。 一名17岁少女梁皓缓表示,完成中文考试卷后,即前往集会。被问及前往集会的目的时,梁皓缓则表示,“明明有这么多港民出来好夸张,为什么这些力量不能改变社会,为什么政府不愿意听?”。 他相信修例会令部分市民移民,但她称生于斯,长于斯,不希望移民,故将站出来对抗。 只有17岁的她认为,事态发展严重,自己未来不排除会罢考,亦有感自己不断下调抗争底线,明言不担心坐监影响前途。 另一名中四学生Alex 与父亲则接受《经济日报》的采访,表示自己力劝父亲一同参与游行,但爸爸以考试为由或担心暴力发生推搪,一气之下和爸爸冷战。 “我怎么说他都不听,反正就不信示威者会和平。” Alex…


根据SMRT地铁( SMRT Trains)在官网公布的数据显示,截至今年三月的2019财年,该公司蒙受1亿5500万元的巨额亏损。 官网声明指亏损理由是运营开销增加,特别是维修及人力成本大幅提高,导致SMRT地铁蒙受的亏损明显扩大。 这也是SMRT地铁连续两年蒙受亏损。2018财年的亏损高达8600万元。 该公司数据指,在2019财年里,公司投入在地铁维修与保养方面的开支持续增加,占了地铁车资收入的71巴仙。这在2018财年里,占了62巴仙。 这意味着,每赚取一元车资收入,有0.71元都要用在维修等相关开销。这些开销也包括维修员工成本、零件材料、地铁资产折旧等。 SMRT补充,比起上一财年的7亿4320万新元营收,其地铁业务在2018/19财年的营收有所减少,只达到7亿3660万元。 SMRT在2016年10月31日从新加坡交易所除牌,成为淡马锡控股独资子公司。这也是它私有化后,发布的第三份地铁业绩与运营报告。 SMRT集团包括子公司的整体业绩也出现赤字,税后净亏损从上财年约7千240万元,扩大到2019财年的1亿1710万元。 许文远:铁路运营成本增加 在上月初,交通部长许文远在国会上指出,政府目前补贴超过30巴仙的公共交通运营,并表示有需要在四年内提升票价来维持津贴。 “2016年至2017年期间,铁路网络的运营成本,增加了约2亿7000万元。”…

制造商总会称 “敌对形式”未必有效解决职场歧视

职场上一些雇主的歧视案例,可能涉及偏好外籍人士、族群或宗教,在性别层面,则“回避”怀孕、身障或有特殊看护需求的雇员。根据人力部最新雇用标准报告,仅2020年上半年,有约70名雇主涉及职场歧视行为,比2019年全年的人数高出了近一半。 对此,新加坡妇女行动与研究协会(AWARE)高级执行人员梅尔瓦尼(Mamta Melwani),曾在去年12月呼吁,理应立法遏止职场歧视的现象,确保雇主问责。 遗憾的是,先有全国雇主联合会(SNEF)执行董事长沈锦源,不愿直面问题,推托立法管制恐弊多于利;就连新加坡制造商总会(Singapore Manufacturing Federation,简称SMF)秘书长,也宣称要减少职场歧视,应采用较少”敌对”的调解方式,比立法管制更有效。 梅尔瓦尼表示,许多工作场所歧视案例往往不被上报,是因为法律缺乏对雇员的法律保护,因此雇员最终都选择不向雇主提出申诉。 梅尔瓦尼续指,工作场所平等法不仅应提供在职员工保障,也应该涵盖被解雇员工,保留对雇主追究法律责任的空间。 投诉者忌惮被雇主报复 “他们担心劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟(TAFEP)不会为他们的投诉保密,最终在投诉曝光后遭到雇主的报复。“ 对此,全国雇联执行董事沈锦源回应,若采取法律方式解决工作场所问题,只会导致僵化和加剧工作场所的不良关系。这反而不利于雇主和雇员。 “立法也不太可能改变那些因为害怕遭到报复,或者担心被识破而选择不举报的雇员心态。相反,一名负责人的雇主会认真且巧妙地处理这类案件,确保和谐的工作环境。”…