In March 2018, Singaporean ex-political detainee Dr Poh Soo Kai made a personal recording in an attempt to clear his name from the false accusations surrounding the Katong Bombing 1974 occurrence.

A video was shared by Local NGO Function 8 yesterday morning (2 May) and it explained the tumultuous events that transpired in the 1970s as well as Dr Poh’s comments on the fake news that affected his life and medical career.

Singaporean politician Dr Poh Soo Kai was a founding member of the University Socialist Club and the People’s Action Party (PAP) in 1954. He then left to become the Assistant Secretary-General of the Barisan Sosialis when PAP split in 1961. During the Operation Coldstore in 1963, Dr Poh was arrested and detained without trial for 11 years under the Preservation of Public Security Ordinance.

On 20 December 1974, a car exploded along Still Road around 6 am, resulting in one of the passengers being injured. Authorities later discovered that three men were transporting bombs encased in milk tins to the home of a factory managing director’s house in Teluk Kurau due to the industrial strife with his workers at the Nanyang Shoe Factory in Johor Bahru.

Later in 1976, Dr Poh was detained as a political prisoner without trial yet again but this time, it was under the ISA. He and his comrades were arrested when they were forming a civil rights society in which he was imprisoned for another 6 years. At the same time, he was also interrogated by the ISD concerning his relations with the Katong bomber.

On 23 September 2011, MHA issued a statement accusing Dr Poh of assisting a CPM saboteur, the injured bomber from the Katong blast. This was in reference to a fictional story composed by the Internal Security Department (ISD) that Dr Poh, his wife Grace, and Dr G Raman visited Masai in Johor to treat the injured communist in an isolated wooden house.

Dr Poh clarified that what Lee Kuan Yew informed the media channels overseas regarding the Masai incident was “totally fake news”. He also added the fact this can be proven as none of the customs or immigration authorities has any details of their passport or car plate numbers “at that hour of the night or (at) any hour”.

Up to today, Dr Poh testifies that he has never been to Masai. He even wrote a book titled “Living in a Time of Deception” to recount his personal and political history under the nation’s founding father as well as to expose certain truths during his regime.

Dr G Raman was later arrested in February 1977 and made a claim implicating Dr Poh and wife with the Masai incident after being subjected to physical torture and sleep deprivation. Later on, he retracted the allegation through a statutory declaration before a senior public prosecutor at the Attorney-General’s Chamber. He also refuted the falsehood in his book, “A Quest for Freedom”, published in September last year.

On 19 October 2011, Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister Teo Chee Hean spoke about the need for a tough tool like the Internal Security Act (ISA) to preserve the peace.

In his parliamentary speech, he said that ISA is a powerful law with safeguards built in and enhanced when needed. It would empower the government to address threats to national security not just through preventive detention, but also other measures like the imposition of curfews to deal with civil disorder, he added.

“More than 800 people were arrested under the ISA (Internal Security Act) in the 1970s, of whom 235 were issued with Orders of Detention,” he said.

From the 1960s till the late 1980s, the ISA was necessary for combating the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM). Most of the people arrested and detained in the 1970s were more than just sympathisers and had provided financial, logistics and manpower support to the CPM insurgents.

Dr Poh’s circumstances prove to be a classic example of the falsehoods that can be unjustly perpetuated if certain governing bodies or political parties are given the absolute powers to censure and control the dissemination of information to the public.

Just last month on 1 April, the Singapore Parliament presented the introduction of the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Bill, also known as the “fake news” Bill. The second and third readings are to be expected sometime in May 2019.

According to Gov.sg, the intention of the Bill is to ensure that online falsehoods, which are untrue and misleading statements online with the potential to incite unrest and disrupt the society, are corrected in time and prevented from spreading.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

非法采砂令东南亚各国付出环境代价

全球每年对建筑材料的需求量达到300至400亿吨,其中砂石就占了半数,是仅次于水源,人类开采、使用最多的天然资源。 近五年,中国和印度大兴土木,中国国内建设发展迅速,仅一年就铺设了12万6千公里的大道。对于砂石的需求量大,仅2011至2014年,其混凝土建材用料总和相当于美国在整个20世纪的用量。 当这些国家内的砂石供不应求,促成了国际砂石的贸易。许多国家包括新加坡,都有向泰国,缅甸,柬埔寨,印尼和马来西亚等国,进口砂石,然而其中有也有来自非法采砂的供应。 在斯里兰卡,挖沙造成环境破坏,挖沙也拉低水平面,污染饮水源;挖砂留下一坑坑死水,引起霍乱肆虐。 2014年,沙石占了全球采集矿产的85巴仙。暴增需求量推高砂石价格,鼓励非法挖砂活动。每年采砂总值500亿英镑,在砂石稀缺的地方,每平方米砂石售价可高达62英镑。 有人或许会问,既然中东和沙哈拉沙漠拥有大片砂石,为何非得用河砂或海砂?原因在于沙漠的砂经过长期风化摩擦变得非常圆润无棱,相对下海砂河砂则更容易与混凝土完美融合。即便是杜拜的摩天高楼,建材也不来自周边沙漠,用的砂石却是进口自远方的澳洲。 黑心采砂不在乎环境问题 如果从偏远内陆河床或小岛沙滩,就能采集到源源不绝的砂石,为何要花钱向合法砂矿买砂? 砂石有价致使这些黑心商家铤而走险,挖取砂石谋取无本暴利,根本不在乎对环境造成的破坏,甚至挖掉整座岛、一系列的岛屿,也在所不惜。 在印度,有环境记者因为尝试揭发非法挖砂而丧命。基于可降低成本,一些进口国也鲜少过问砂石的来源是否合法。 中国对于南中国海的主权扩张,砂石的作用也少不了:用以建设可驻军的人造岛屿。 新加坡,世界最大的砂石进口国,进口来自印尼、大马、柬埔寨和泰国等地,大部分为非法采集的砂石,用以填海拓展国土面积达20巴仙。…

Petain Road name change would open floodgates

~ By Narayana Narayana ~ Prof Tommy Koh' posted a commentary "Should…

安华重返国会

马来西亚最大执政党候任主席拿督斯里安华于今早,在国会宣誓就任波德申(Port Dickson)国会议员,完成其拜相进程的第一步。 在上周六(本月13日),在波德申国会议席7角战中,安华得票3万1016张票,以2万3560张多数票完胜其他候选人。这场补选中主要的竞争对手:伊党候选人莫哈末纳扎里和前森美兰州务大臣丹斯里伊沙沙末,仅得票7456和4230张。 马来西亚波德申国席补选,各候选人得票率: 希盟公正党安华(71岁):31016张 独立人士刘雪燕:(51岁):214张 独立人士塞夫(33岁):82张 伊斯兰党莫哈末纳扎里(57岁):7456张 独立人士伊沙沙末(69岁):4230张 独立人士曾庆亮(51岁):337张 独立人士简梓源(45岁):154张 安华需要狂胜…

Joseph Schooling donates $10k to charity on his birthday

Singapore’s swimming star Joseph Schooling donated S$10,000 to charity to mark his…