Following the story of a National University of Singapore (NUS) student, Monica Baey, who was filmed while in the shower by another fellow student, the NUS Dean of Students released a statement addressing the issue.

His response comes a day after Ms Baey’s story – which was first shared on her Instagram – was reported on by the media. Ms Baey had revealed that after reporting the traumatic incident to the authorities and NUS, the perpetrator was given a rather light punishment which Ms Baey felt was not proportional to the crime he has committed.

In response, Assoc Prof Peter Pang said in his statement, “We are sorry for Miss Monica Baey’s distressing experience, which is of extreme concern to the University. We are in the process of reaching out to her to offer our support and assistance.”

The statement continued by describing the in general terms how the NUS Board of Discipline conducts its disciplinary proceedings and the factors it takes into consideration when considering punishment. These include “the severity of the offence, the rehabilitative needs of the student offender and justice for the victim”, among others.

The statement, in which the Dean was careful to not direct blame at any one person nor acknowledge any of the flaws in the system that Ms Baey had pointed out, also noted that that a committee will be convened by the NUS President to review current disciplinary and support frameworks. The findings from said committee as well as follow up actions will be shared in the new academic year, said the Dean.

The statement was shared on NUS’ official Facebook page.

One former NUS student, Grace Yeoh, commented that the statement left a lot to be desired. She said, “As an NUS CNM grad, I hope that in your crisis management classes, you use this statement as an example of how to destroy your brand.”

Ms Yeoh who is currently a writer at RICE Media, suggested that NUS fire their entire corporate communications department for being “spineless, tone-deaf, out of touch, unempathetic, clueless about social media, AND terrible at crisis management.”

In Ms Yeoh’s rewritten statement, she had NUS not only acknowledge the flaws in the system but also accept responsibility what happened, offer actual help to the victim and her family, and apologise for the way the case was handled as well as emphasising the university’s strict policies on the matter.

She wrote:

“We take full responsibility for Miss Monica Baey getting filmed while showering in NUS’ Eusoff Hall’s female toilet by Mr Nicholas Lim. We have reached out to Miss Baey and her family to offer them professional victim support, in the form of unlimited and fully-subsidised sessions with trained counsellors who specialise in sexual harassment and/or assault cases.

The offence is sexual harassment, which we consider a serious crime. The NUS Board of Discipline operates under a strict ‘No Tolerance’ policy, so we understand the anger expressed by members of our community and the public regarding the punishment meted out.

Moving forward, we will reconsider more severe punishment for the offender, improve security in all toilets, and set up a special body dedicated to victim support.

In our handling of the case thus far, we’ve failed Miss Baey, members of our community, and the public. We seek your forgiveness as we strengthen our sexual misconduct policies, reflect on our own blindspots, and work to change the uncompassionate culture that has manifest.”

All in all, Ms Yeoh’s alternative statement comes off as more empathetic, humane, considerate, and compassionate towards the victim while still being strict towards the offender. I don’t know about you, but I think I’d have more faith in NUS – or any company – if they were more open to acknowledging their mistakes and show sincerity in the actions they’re taking towards bettering their policies. It’s definitely better than taking a weak, and ‘safe’ stand on such an important issue.

Another user then replied to Ms Yeoh, saying that she was putting too much weight on the role of the corporate communications department when it’s the management who is clearly responsible for the way they have responded. He also said that she would know this if she had any ‘real world’ experience.

Ms Yeoh replied by saying that she has been in the industry for 3 years and takes offence that he is belitting the role of the department. She noted that while the crux of the issue lies with the management and the culture they’ve cultivated, it’s the role of the corporate comms department to shape public perception and manage crisis.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

以为李函轩仅是体力耗尽 指挥官再三被提醒仍延误送医

即使已经出现中暑现象,指挥官却误判国民服役人员李函轩仅是体力耗尽,错失送医抢救时间,医疗专家也认为,“拖了40分钟才将他送医,真的是太久了。” 本周三(13日),有关李函轩事件的细节,以及指挥官多项违规的情况,首次在验尸庭研讯(coroner’s inquiry)上曝光。 根据警方的调查报告,已故指挥官陈宝树,当时评估李函轩为体力耗尽,而不是中暑,因此拒绝指派他到医疗中心接受治疗,而是要求他在原地等待。 同时,他也拒绝了为李函轩吊点滴,延迟了40分钟才送医,医疗专家分析,由于时间拖得太久,引起多器官衰竭,致使李函轩不幸死亡,年仅19岁。 李函轩在中暑前身体看似无恙 法院得知,李函轩于2018年4月18日早上6点45分与其他军人一同快步行军,他在一开始看上去身体状况良好,还能与上级谈天。 然而,在最后两公里时,他向一级中士报告自己小腿抽筋,被允许暂停休息做伸展,并在最后一阶段,持续获得休息。 当时身为第一精卫营的指挥官陈宝树在最后300米加入行军,而李函轩则在8点25分左右越过终点线,最终跪在地上。 据悉,当时他时间线已经被记录下来,并被带到休息区,可是当他走到休息区时已经开始摇晃,口齿不清。 据观察,他开始出现反应迟钝、口水直流、呼吸沉重。他的装备也立即被移除和衣服被揭开。在陈宝树的指示下,将冰袋放在李函轩脖子、腋下和腹股沟,并用水冲洗脸部。 李函轩也被灌上等渗饮料(isotonic…

撞车后留纸条致歉 诚实肇事者感动车主

本地男子回到车中发现有小纸条,原来是承认撞了车子的肇事者,留下联系方式,让男子感到非常安慰,赞扬男子的负责任和诚实举止可贵。 本地社会企业The Thought Collective创办人的Tong Yee,就是此事件的车主。他于9月24日在脸书专页帖文,分享了以上实例。 他表示在当天早上回到车上时,发现在挡风镜上有张小纸条,原来是他的车子被人撞了一下,而肇事者留下纸条供联系。“我刚刚撞了你的车后方,请联系我。” 车主随后下车检查,只见后车厢的保险杠上有一个小凹凸和轻微受损的程度。 车主之后通过通讯程序WhatsApp联系肇事者,就和对方表示只要200元的维修费,若超过了200元会自行支付。 肇事者Shamsul在简讯中多次道歉,并表示愿意承担200元维修费,只是要等到下周一,领薪水后才能够付款。对此,车主表示可以了解Shamsul的处境, “可以慢慢来。每个月给50元也可以” 。 此外,车主也邀请Shamsul喝茶,赞扬他的负责任心态和诚实举止,“我最近面对很大压力,你的举动让我释怀了许多。”…


回溯2015年,在一项访谈活动上,李显龙同理就曾回应,有关新加坡会不会出现类似香港与台湾的抗议政府的示威或群众运动。 根据总理公署发布于2015年1月18日的视频,总理接受记者访谈,其中媒体询及,在香港占领中环运动、台湾学生占领立法院等,都由年轻人领导。那么总理是否担心,类似情况也会发生在新加坡? 但是,总理并没有直接回应,究竟新加坡会不会出现、政府又会否认同这种群众运动。他仅表示,新加坡、台湾和香港,有相似的地方,也有很多不同点。例如三个地方都主要由华人社群组成、都曾是亚洲四小龙,都曾经历迅速的经济成长过程。 他认为,最近十几年,新、港、台已分道扬镳。“香港是中国一部分,香港年轻人担心买不起房子,根本没地方住,更甭论结婚生孩子,”他说,香港人也担心来自中国大陆的竞争和整个中国社会可能完全掩盖了香港的特色。 对于香港占中运动,他认为虽然示威主要诉求是抗议特首选举制度,但背后有其他社会和政治背景。 “台湾毕业生驾德士、做小生意” 当时,李总理认为,大部分台湾人都希望保持现状,且过去十几年来台湾经济确实面对一些问题,“经济发展较慢,年轻人毕业虽不是问题,但是他们当中做不满意的工作也很多,例如驾驶德士,或者做些小生意,甚至到我国拿工作著准证。” 不过,总理似乎忘了,我国一些毕业生也面对找不到工作的问题。以最近的人力部2019年第一季度劳工市场报告,显示30岁以下工作年龄国人,有5.2巴仙失业。有者具有经济、工程学位,但却找不到工作只能开私召车。 他认为台湾经济可能过去十多年来失去明确发展方向,“要向中国走(企业走进中国),又害怕靠拢中国;要离开中国,又走不出去;要让外劳进来又怕影响社会,但没有外劳经济又停滞不前。” 李总理认为我国面对的挑战,在房屋政策上可能觉得政府办的不否快,“但是要买屋子不成问题。在新加坡,大家都是买了屋子才结婚吧?” 他也揶揄,如果在香港和台湾问当地年轻人“什么时候买房?”会被认为是在戏弄他们,因为他们没办法想象买房,除非是大富豪。 当年称毕业生六个月内98巴仙都找到工作…

The 4 “Insteads” in out-going labour chief Lim Swee Say’s May Day message

In his May Day message, out-going secretary-general for the National Trade Union…