Following the story of a National University of Singapore (NUS) student, Monica Baey, who was filmed while in the shower by another fellow student, the NUS Dean of Students released a statement addressing the issue.

His response comes a day after Ms Baey’s story – which was first shared on her Instagram – was reported on by the media. Ms Baey had revealed that after reporting the traumatic incident to the authorities and NUS, the perpetrator was given a rather light punishment which Ms Baey felt was not proportional to the crime he has committed.

In response, Assoc Prof Peter Pang said in his statement, “We are sorry for Miss Monica Baey’s distressing experience, which is of extreme concern to the University. We are in the process of reaching out to her to offer our support and assistance.”

The statement continued by describing the in general terms how the NUS Board of Discipline conducts its disciplinary proceedings and the factors it takes into consideration when considering punishment. These include “the severity of the offence, the rehabilitative needs of the student offender and justice for the victim”, among others.

The statement, in which the Dean was careful to not direct blame at any one person nor acknowledge any of the flaws in the system that Ms Baey had pointed out, also noted that that a committee will be convened by the NUS President to review current disciplinary and support frameworks. The findings from said committee as well as follow up actions will be shared in the new academic year, said the Dean.

The statement was shared on NUS’ official Facebook page.

One former NUS student, Grace Yeoh, commented that the statement left a lot to be desired. She said, “As an NUS CNM grad, I hope that in your crisis management classes, you use this statement as an example of how to destroy your brand.”

Ms Yeoh who is currently a writer at RICE Media, suggested that NUS fire their entire corporate communications department for being “spineless, tone-deaf, out of touch, unempathetic, clueless about social media, AND terrible at crisis management.”

In Ms Yeoh’s rewritten statement, she had NUS not only acknowledge the flaws in the system but also accept responsibility what happened, offer actual help to the victim and her family, and apologise for the way the case was handled as well as emphasising the university’s strict policies on the matter.

She wrote:

“We take full responsibility for Miss Monica Baey getting filmed while showering in NUS’ Eusoff Hall’s female toilet by Mr Nicholas Lim. We have reached out to Miss Baey and her family to offer them professional victim support, in the form of unlimited and fully-subsidised sessions with trained counsellors who specialise in sexual harassment and/or assault cases.

The offence is sexual harassment, which we consider a serious crime. The NUS Board of Discipline operates under a strict ‘No Tolerance’ policy, so we understand the anger expressed by members of our community and the public regarding the punishment meted out.

Moving forward, we will reconsider more severe punishment for the offender, improve security in all toilets, and set up a special body dedicated to victim support.

In our handling of the case thus far, we’ve failed Miss Baey, members of our community, and the public. We seek your forgiveness as we strengthen our sexual misconduct policies, reflect on our own blindspots, and work to change the uncompassionate culture that has manifest.”

All in all, Ms Yeoh’s alternative statement comes off as more empathetic, humane, considerate, and compassionate towards the victim while still being strict towards the offender. I don’t know about you, but I think I’d have more faith in NUS – or any company – if they were more open to acknowledging their mistakes and show sincerity in the actions they’re taking towards bettering their policies. It’s definitely better than taking a weak, and ‘safe’ stand on such an important issue.

Another user then replied to Ms Yeoh, saying that she was putting too much weight on the role of the corporate communications department when it’s the management who is clearly responsible for the way they have responded. He also said that she would know this if she had any ‘real world’ experience.

Ms Yeoh replied by saying that she has been in the industry for 3 years and takes offence that he is belitting the role of the department. She noted that while the crux of the issue lies with the management and the culture they’ve cultivated, it’s the role of the corporate comms department to shape public perception and manage crisis.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

民主党林文兴劝《海峡时报》 想与人民连结,须停止当政府传声筒

民主党林文兴表示,若《海峡时报》真的想要持续和人民连结,必须停止作为政府的传声筒。 上述言论是针对《海峡时报》的一篇报道,新加坡2020年大选:年轻选民对选举结果发挥至关重要的效应(Singapore GE2020: Signs of young voters’ crucial role in election outcome)作出的回应。…

女佣周日聚集地有商机 非法小贩卖肉丸汤遭取缔

看准女佣聚集地点有商机,非法小贩在周日到城市购物中心外草地,现场煮食牛肉丸汤(Bakso)售卖。不料,遭人举报而引来执法人员取缔,非法小贩和食客皆鸟兽散。 城市购物中心外草地,也是女佣在周日的聚集地,他们惯在地上铺垫野餐、聊天。相信有人看准商机,向女佣们兜售印尼美食牛肉丸。 不过,三名执法人员突然到场扫荡,非法小贩落荒而逃,只留下一地的碗盘、锅具和便携灶炉。 相信是印尼籍的网民季涵在本周日(16日)上传脸书,记录非法小贩被取缔后的情形。 录制视频的女子似乎对被取缔的小贩感到同情,并表示新加坡是个法治严明国家,随意兜售肉丸汤也会被取缔,呼吁同胞必须小心,避免触法。 印尼同胞提醒务必遵守本地法律 一些印尼客工则留言表示,其实执法人员已经提醒了他们几次,不过非法小贩的问题还是存在。 他们提醒在新加坡的同胞,必须遵守本地法律,因为这里有别于可自由兜售的印尼,在新加坡,他们领的是工作准证,就意味着他们不应从事其他活动,例如小贩或网购。 根据环境局条例,非法小贩的货物可被充公,初犯者可被罚款300元,此后罚款将提升至400元和500元,甚至是被控上庭。 根据《联合早报》报导,环境局去年取缔340名非法小贩,其中因售卖食品而遭取缔的超过200人。 根据环境局公布的数据,当局于2017年取缔了340名售卖食品或是家庭用品,以及手机配件等的非法小贩。 当中大部分都是售卖食品的非法小贩,他们所售卖的食物包括水果、乌打和咖喱角等。…

Attempts to smuggle 1,080 e-vaporiser refill pods and 10 e-vaporiser modules foiled by ICA

A total of 1,080 e-vaporiser refill pods and 10 e-vaporiser modules were…

TPE一带路旁发生泥石倾泻! 陆交局称已修复草坡

上周六(2日),交通资讯媒体SG Road Vigilante分享,在淡滨尼快速公路(TPE)一带路旁的草坡,出现泥石倾泻事件!   受影响路段这个位于TPE往泛岛快速公路(PIE)方向,罗央道(Loyang Avenue)出口,相信是连日豪雨,导致草坡泥石倾泻,从短片可见,滑落的泥石甚至冲坏路旁围栏。   不过,据陆路交通管理局于今日(4日)在官方脸书发文,澄清目前草坡已修复,但仍建议驾驶者改用其他道路,前往罗央工业区,建议使用巴西立12通道出口;前往淡滨尼或白沙一带,可使用巴西立8通道/淡滨尼12道出口。   若前往弗洛拉(Flora Estate),则可使用樟宜北路上段。  …