Last Fri (5 Apr), a member of the public Dr Jeremy Teo Chin Ghee wrote on ST Forum asking the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to consider tightening regulations around the issue of perpetual securities and preference shares by companies in favour of the regular retail bonds.

His call came in the wake of the Hyflux debacle, which saw retail investors losing nearly all their investments in Hyflux’s perpetual securities and preference shares.

Dr Teo argued that retail bond offerings increase transparency on the financial health of a company as perpetual securities, even though they are permitted to be recognized as equity under current accounting standard, “are, for all intents and purposes, debt”. Hence, he said that the practice of recognizing perpetual securities as equity is “questionable”.

“Institutional investors can calculate the true gearing of a company, but the average investor is ill-equipped to do so and may be easily misled,” he added. And, he pointed out that bonds have a higher priority in liquidation than perpetual securities and preference shares and can help to “protect (retail bond) investors”.

“Coupon payments for bonds also cannot be deferred without defaulting and there is a fixed redemption date, providing additional protection for small investors,” he explained.

Temasek responds immediately

Then, out of the blue, Temasek’s Head of Public Affairs Stephen Forshaw, responded on ST Forum today (8 Apr) disagreeing with Dr Teo’s call for tighter regulations on riskier bond-like product offers.

“Dr Jeremy Teo Chin Ghee raised interesting points in his letter,” Mr Forshaw wrote. “We believe retail investors should have access to a wider range of risk-reward products, rather than be cut from riskier products through tighter regulations – the current regulations already require comprehensive disclosures of risks.”

Mr Forshaw said that the key is to ensure the risk disclosures of a financial product be made accessible and understandable to “a lay reader”.

He added that such information can be made into a “more accessible format” via a gatefold, which is actually a foldout.

“Our research led us to a different approach in respect of our first Temasek Retail Bond,” he said. “We took a leaf from the issue of Astrea IV Private Equity Bonds, and made a special effort to provide a more accessible format of risk disclosures via a gatefold.”

“The gatefold supplemented the offering documents, and was intended to be retail-friendly and easy to understand,” Mr Forshaw further explained.

“In particular, the gatefold highlighted the associated risks in an accessible manner. Feedback was very positive on the presentation of pictorials, flowcharts of fund flows, credit ratios and FAQs for both the Astrea IV and Temasek gatefolds.”

Mr Forshaw encouraged others to follow Temasek’s footsteps by also using gatefolds in their offering documents so as to “highlight the key credit risks of their businesses”, and hence, ensuring retail investors would know about the risks before investing in riskier bond-like products.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Anthony Yeo, the lion content to be only a little mouse

“I am going to learn so I can come back to help people’.” Yeo Toon Joo pays tribute to his brother.

CocoLuscious recalls products due to presence of undeclared allergen

The Food Standards Australia New Zealand had earlier issued an alert that…

Massive jam on KJE caused by fatal accident between a car and a motorcycle

A fatal accident between a car and a motorcycle occured on Kranji…

抵触《公共秩序法》被禁两周 行动艺术家施兰今获释

经历两周监禁,艺术家和社运分子施兰(Seelan Palay)于今日获释。在脸书上,他宣称他的艺术表演:“32年:镜子的审问”随着他的监禁划下总结。 在本月3日,新加坡法院判处施兰因在未获许可证下进行表演活动,触犯《公共秩序法》罪名成立,罚款2千500元,或监禁两周。而施兰选择了监禁的惩处。 他在未有代表律师的情况下,出席9月26日的法庭审讯。面对主控官的审问,施兰坚称其艺术表演全程以平和的方式进行,且没有告知、直到任何人追随他,从原表演地点国家艺术馆走到国会。 他也强调,表演他全程沉默,仅靠镜子来表达含义,以及针对警方的询问才作礼貌答复。 当主控官质问,其表演具有目的、是否影射政府当年监禁谢太宝的决策是错误的,施兰则回应,艺术本身并不必然有任何目的。 在去年10月,施兰独自一人站在国会前,举着“一面画有图案的镜子,批判政府前国会议员谢太宝遭囚禁和软禁32年,进行无声抗议。在警方劝离不果而被当场逮捕。 谢太宝在1966年在内安法令下被逮捕,被政府指控从事亲共、颠覆政府活动。结果,这名议员在未经审讯和起诉下,被监禁至1998年才重获自由。 ‘网络公民’以视频记录下施兰的和平抗议,后者并无作出多大的威胁,为了控诉对前国会议员谢太宝的不当囚禁待遇,只是拿着一面镜子站在艺术馆和国会前和平抗议。 他不曾干扰民众,也不曾反抗警方,然而施兰最终还是被逮捕了。逮捕施兰的行动,显示当权者无法容忍异议与民众的批判,也延续了司法的不公义。