According to the government’s feedback unit REACH, 60% Singaporeans surveyed were aware of the government’s ban on Swedish metal band WATAIN last month and of those, two in three or 66.66% agreed with the decision.

According to a poll conducted by REACH via computer-assisted random telephone interviews, of the 680 people surveyed – including those of different ages and religions – younger respondents in their 20s were most likely (67%) to disagree with the decision to disallow the concert. The same applied to those who identified as Free Thinkers (51%).

(Image by REACH)

Of these 680 people surveyed, 25% said they performances which may impact religious sensitivities in Singapore should be banned while about two in three feel that they could be allowed with specific conditions to prevent offensive content.

Across agree groups, respondents were more likely to feel that performances which may impact religious sensitivities should be allowed with certain preconditions, however this number decreased going up the age range – 89% of respondents in their 20s felt this way versus only 47% of respondents over 60.

In reviewing the poll’s findings, REACH chairman Sam Tan said: “It is heartening that the majority of Singaporeans appreciate the importance of respecting religious sensitivities in our multi-racial and multi-religious environment.”

He added, “In light of recent events in New Zealand and other parts of the world, I hope younger Singaporeans understand the delicate balance needed to maintain this place we call home and cherish the peace and harmony that has been built up over the decades,”

The response to the poll on CNA’s Facebook page has been largely skeptical. Netizens question the reach of REACH’s poll, with many questioning where they found their respondents:

Others commented on the small samples size of 680 respondents which isn’t a representation of Singapore, a country of 5.6 million people:

Still others commented on the poll itself, noting a majority of Singaporeans have never heard of it before today:

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Don’t look left or right

Dr Wong Wee Nam/ There is a Chinese saying which goes like…

NTUC Income should not call itself a cooperative because its main objective is to profit shareholders, esp the Govt

By Philip Ang Our Singapore government has unique powers to redefine just…

Why do teachers stop wanting to be teachers?

By Choenix If I were as highly acclaimed as Steven Levitt, I’ll…

非议毕丹星声援亚菲言 陈有明反遭网民挞伐

裕廊集选区议员陈有明医生,在人民行动党官网发文,非议工人党秘书长毕丹星声援亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at),也翻旧账指亚菲言并非爱国的“友善批评者”,过去曾袒护马来西亚和马哈迪。孰不知此举反遭网民挞伐,并列举出选举局守则:候选人对待选举过程应负责任和庄严,避免以仇恨或诋毁对手的方式竞选。 毕丹星则转发了陈有明刊载在行动党官网的评论。只轻描淡写道“友爱批评者,也是新加坡的儿子。就如陈医生您和我一样,人非圣贤。” 事缘在6月5日,毕丹星参与“坚毅向前”预算案辩论,曾提及我们应庆幸友爱的批判者( loving critics)的存在;且政府也应意识到,民间的批评乃是因为他们关注议题。 相信毕丹星是响应去年巡回大使许通美教授,后者劝谕第四代领导班子,理应能欢迎和接纳异议分子的批评;也强调新加坡需要的不是阿谀奉承者(sycophants),而是友爱的批判者和乐于接受批评的人。 不过,陈有明则在评论中,翻出陈年旧账一一列举亚菲言过去的留言,也指后者尽管在新加坡成长,但是却嘲讽新加坡,也“受到马哈迪的吸引”,希望新加坡能像马来西亚一样。 亚菲言:也针对种族政治议题批评马国 孰不知陈有明借亚菲言抨击毕丹星的做法,却为亚菲言获得不少“同情票”。亚菲言则很遗憾自己把反对党“拉下水”,他表示很乐意和陈有明医生讨论有关新马关系、已故李光耀和马哈迪的观点。而亚菲言更多的是对爱国情操作出反思,也表示自己有时也会批评马国,例如写了一部剧控诉马国的种族政治。 也有网民则分享选举局的竞选指南,指竞选者都应保持负责任和庄严的态度,避免用仇恨或拉低对手等方式博宣传。也有者认为,先是许通美提出友善批评者的说法,陈有明应该先去与许通美辩论。 一些支持者也非议陈有明使用这种攻击对手的方式。…