Yesterday (19 Mar), a federal jury in San Francisco found Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer was a substantial factor in causing cancer in a Californian man, Edwin Hardeman. Mr Hardeman was the first person to challenge Monsanto’s Roundup in a federal court.

During the trial, the 70-year-old testified that he had use the weed killer for a long period of time and at one time got it on his skin before he was diagnosed with cancer.

The Hardeman’s case is considered a landmark trial for hundreds of other plaintiffs in the US with similar claims, which means the verdict could affect future litigation and other cancer patients and families. Monsanto, now owned by the German pharmaceutical company Bayer, is facing more than 11,000 similar lawsuits across the US.

Yesterday’s ruling at a federal court followed a historic verdict last August in which a California state court ruled that Roundup caused the terminal cancer of Dewayne Johnson, a former school groundskeeper. In Mr Johnson’s case, the jury found Monsanto had “acted with malice or oppression” and awarded him US$289 million in damages. The verdict was later reduced by to US$78 million.

Monsanto has continued to argue that Roundup is safe to use and does not cause cancer.

In the next phase of the federal trial, Mr Hardeman’s lawyers will present evidence, including internal Monsanto documents, that could show the company knew the dangers of Roundup and glyphosate and attempted to cover them up. The jury will also weigh liability and damages.

Temasek invests 3 billion euros in Bayer to support its acquisition of Monsanto

After yesterday’s trial, the president of the NGO Environmental Working Group, Ken Cook, said, “Today’s verdict reinforces what another jury found last year, and what scientists with the state of California and the World Health Organization have concluded: Glyphosate causes cancer in people.”

“As similar lawsuits mount, the evidence will grow that Roundup is not safe, and that the company has tried to cover it up,” Mr Cook added.

“The decision by Bayer to purchase Monsanto, a company with a long history of environmental malfeasance, could go down as one of the worst business decisions ever made. The day of reckoning for Bayer and its cancer-causing weedkiller is getting closer.”

In fact, it was Singapore’s Temasek Holdings which helped Bayer to acquire Monsanto.

It was reported in Apr last year that Bayer sold 3.6 per cent stake to Temasek for 3 billion euros at 96.77 euros per share. The money is used as part of Bayer’s plan to takeover Monsanto. Together with its existing holding in Bayer, Temasek would then own about 4 percent in Bayer after the transaction. By Jun, with Temasek’s help, Bayer successfully acquired Monsanto to become the biggest seed and agricultural chemical maker in the world.

Since Bayer’s subsidiary, Monsanto, lost in last Aug’s trial, investors have been viewing Bayer shares as high-risk stocks which they don’t want to include in their portfolios. Bayer has shed more than 30 billion euros from its market capitalization since losing its case in the California state court. It has also cut huge numbers of jobs and sold off parts of the company.

As at yesterday’s closing, Bayer’s share price was 69.70 euros. Since Temasek bought 3 billion euros worth of shares at 96.77 euros in Apr last year, that means it has lost 27.07 euros per share or 28% of the 3 billion euros investment. So, in less than a year, Temasek has lost at least 840 million euros or S$1.3 billion.

Meanwhile, Bayer CEO Baumann who came to Singapore in Jan this year to meet up with Temasek has assured that his company would put up a more “rigorous defence” of the chemical glyphosate used in Monsanto’s weed killer in the impending lawsuits. He continued to deny that Monsanto’s weed killer causes cancer in those cancer sufferers, who are suing Monsanto in the more than 11,000 cases.

The next Roundup trial is scheduled to begin in California state court in Oakland on March 28 next week, involving a couple who claim Roundup has caused their non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Even as more cases are waiting to be heard in US courts, more cancer sufferers are also queuing to file suits against Monsanto.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

点评张志贤演说 梁文辉称外交政策也朝错误方向发展

昨日(11日),国务资政兼国家安全统筹部长张志贤,发表“冠病后时代保障新加坡未来”演说。对于国际局势,他认为冠病扰乱国际体系,中美竞争加剧、全球供应链中断。但他认为,各国不应因冠病渐行渐远;需要新的国际协议,逐步恢复跨境交流、往来,各国需维持合作与贸易关系。 但前进党秘书长梁文辉点评,除了我们的国内政策外,我们的外交政策也朝着错误的方向发展。 他指出,作为全球化超级推动者,我们政府实施很多异常政策。当其他国家因工业转移而蒙受失业,我们仍邀请外国人来接管我们的工作。 当其他国家正考虑如何对全球性资本征税的时候,我们却削减了税收(个人税,遗产税,利息收入免税等)还张开双臂吸引资本。这些政策都严重破坏了我们的社会经济结构和职业道德。 全球化“已消亡” 梁文辉认为,外交部门必须意识到,从苏联解体到现在的原始形式的全球化已经“死亡”。 还在维护全球化体系,终将徒劳无功。 全球化造成的社会和经济破坏至少需要一代人才能解决。关键的一环是对以牺牲国内就业为代价,在全球范围内自由流动获取暴利的全球性资本征税。这不会很快实现,因为国际金融家们的游说势力太大了。 也许外交部应该告诉世界,我们理解当前反全球化浪潮,并且提出有助纠正全球化问题的想法。 “我们还应该再迈出一步,摆脱我们的新重商主义国家形象 - 这是一个只关心贸易并从中牟利的国家。利润(黄金,贸易盈余或外汇储备)的积累是最终动机。亚当·史密斯(Adam…

评论:个人代步工具– 关于阶级和愚昧无知

Nicholas Tang: 我必须老实说,我讨厌个人代步工具。我认为他们对社会是有威胁的,落实针对电动滑板车的禁令是应该的。我们也有同样的不满:我们讨厌它们在行人道上快速移动,我们讨厌个人代步工具让我们在已经非常狭窄的行人道,让路人无法安全走路,但通常就是很反感电动滑板车大声播放令人难受的音乐(例如小苹果),我觉得应该要把这也列为“犯罪行为”。 尽管如此,我却认为政府不应该禁止个人代步工具。当然,禁令是最简单快速的解决方式,但却不是最佳方案。这不仅仅是交通安全法规的问题,个人代步工具更像是揭露了社会的裂痕,而我们需要对这些裂痕加以修复,避免社会基础崩裂。我将聚焦在三种不同的要素,他们互相交织与连结,不能仅单独讨论:阶级、政府政策与社会责任。 阶级问题 其中阶级可分为两种问题:首先,他们被视为实用实惠,大众均负担得起;再者,个人代步工具开启了送餐行业新景象,让过去无法负担昂贵高效交通工具的人,找到另一种工作机会。 第一点,在颁布禁令后,网友何益豪(Kelvin Ho)将自己对禁令的不满发布到网上,其中已可明显看见阶级主义的效应。在Reddit中,所有的评论大部分聚焦在嘲笑他作为送餐员与新加坡口音。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czuM9-uxnJ4 嘲笑他人口音缺同理心 当然或许他的送餐经验相对缺乏,但他确实提出几点值得讨论。此外,新加坡确实有一部分人的口音如同何益豪,尽管不能理解他的论点,但也不能成为攻击他个人品行的原因,这显示社会不同阶层的人对彼此缺乏同理心的一种表现。 何益豪提出了观点:不是每个拥有个人代步工具的人,都能够负担摩托车,或是其他交通工具。…

My neighbourhood… after dark.

By zyberzitizen In the heartlands of Singapore – and away from the…

在越南遇车祸 30新大学生全员已回国

30名新加坡管理大学(SMU)的学生于周末到越南国家公园游玩时,其中一辆载着学生的巴士在下山途中突然撞向路旁的路缘石,导致车上的20名学生受到冲击,从座位上跌落受伤。今天,所有学生已经回国,包括其中四名受伤学生是乘坐医疗专机返狮城。 其中,髋部骨折的学生和另一名腿部骨折的学生,于今天(5月14日)回到狮城。而另外两名分别是颈部受伤和腿部骨折的学生,则于昨日抵达新加坡。庆幸的是,四人皆保持清醒,且情况稳定。他们在回国后,就在医院接受治疗。 该大学昨日发出文告指出,之前派出30名大学生参与由该大学扶轮青年服务团举办,在越南中部城市顺华进行的第四届海外社区服务项目“Project Phoniksa”。 他们在当地幼儿园担任志愿工作者,包括在校园内建设混凝土围墙,并且教导英语会话。 结束服务后到国家公园游玩 他们是于4月28日开始该国的社区服务项目,并于上周四结束服务。 事发时,30名大学生分别乘搭两辆小型巴士到顺华附近的巴马国家公园(Bach Ma National Park)游玩。 岂知在回程路上,其中一辆载有20名大学生的巴士在沿着山路下坡时,在转弯处失控撞向左边山坡的路缘石,导致车上的学生因为撞击力而从座位上跌落受伤。巴士车头陷入山坡旁的树丛中,车窗破损,车内一片凌乱。…