Yesterday (19 Mar), a federal jury in San Francisco found Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer was a substantial factor in causing cancer in a Californian man, Edwin Hardeman. Mr Hardeman was the first person to challenge Monsanto’s Roundup in a federal court.

During the trial, the 70-year-old testified that he had use the weed killer for a long period of time and at one time got it on his skin before he was diagnosed with cancer.

The Hardeman’s case is considered a landmark trial for hundreds of other plaintiffs in the US with similar claims, which means the verdict could affect future litigation and other cancer patients and families. Monsanto, now owned by the German pharmaceutical company Bayer, is facing more than 11,000 similar lawsuits across the US.

Yesterday’s ruling at a federal court followed a historic verdict last August in which a California state court ruled that Roundup caused the terminal cancer of Dewayne Johnson, a former school groundskeeper. In Mr Johnson’s case, the jury found Monsanto had “acted with malice or oppression” and awarded him US$289 million in damages. The verdict was later reduced by to US$78 million.

Monsanto has continued to argue that Roundup is safe to use and does not cause cancer.

In the next phase of the federal trial, Mr Hardeman’s lawyers will present evidence, including internal Monsanto documents, that could show the company knew the dangers of Roundup and glyphosate and attempted to cover them up. The jury will also weigh liability and damages.

Temasek invests 3 billion euros in Bayer to support its acquisition of Monsanto

After yesterday’s trial, the president of the NGO Environmental Working Group, Ken Cook, said, “Today’s verdict reinforces what another jury found last year, and what scientists with the state of California and the World Health Organization have concluded: Glyphosate causes cancer in people.”

“As similar lawsuits mount, the evidence will grow that Roundup is not safe, and that the company has tried to cover it up,” Mr Cook added.

“The decision by Bayer to purchase Monsanto, a company with a long history of environmental malfeasance, could go down as one of the worst business decisions ever made. The day of reckoning for Bayer and its cancer-causing weedkiller is getting closer.”

In fact, it was Singapore’s Temasek Holdings which helped Bayer to acquire Monsanto.

It was reported in Apr last year that Bayer sold 3.6 per cent stake to Temasek for 3 billion euros at 96.77 euros per share. The money is used as part of Bayer’s plan to takeover Monsanto. Together with its existing holding in Bayer, Temasek would then own about 4 percent in Bayer after the transaction. By Jun, with Temasek’s help, Bayer successfully acquired Monsanto to become the biggest seed and agricultural chemical maker in the world.

Since Bayer’s subsidiary, Monsanto, lost in last Aug’s trial, investors have been viewing Bayer shares as high-risk stocks which they don’t want to include in their portfolios. Bayer has shed more than 30 billion euros from its market capitalization since losing its case in the California state court. It has also cut huge numbers of jobs and sold off parts of the company.

As at yesterday’s closing, Bayer’s share price was 69.70 euros. Since Temasek bought 3 billion euros worth of shares at 96.77 euros in Apr last year, that means it has lost 27.07 euros per share or 28% of the 3 billion euros investment. So, in less than a year, Temasek has lost at least 840 million euros or S$1.3 billion.

Meanwhile, Bayer CEO Baumann who came to Singapore in Jan this year to meet up with Temasek has assured that his company would put up a more “rigorous defence” of the chemical glyphosate used in Monsanto’s weed killer in the impending lawsuits. He continued to deny that Monsanto’s weed killer causes cancer in those cancer sufferers, who are suing Monsanto in the more than 11,000 cases.

The next Roundup trial is scheduled to begin in California state court in Oakland on March 28 next week, involving a couple who claim Roundup has caused their non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Even as more cases are waiting to be heard in US courts, more cancer sufferers are also queuing to file suits against Monsanto.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

全面最低薪金制“不仅为道义” 毕丹星:渐进薪金制八年仅涵盖三行业

人力部长杨莉明和职总秘书长黄志明昨日(11日)傍晚在脸书上发文,宣布将扩大渐进式薪金模式(Progressive Wage Model,简称PWM),以涵盖更多员工,同时还需维持他们的受雇能力。 清洁、园景和保安领域的近8万名员工。在渐进式薪金模式下,规定每年加薪幅度,使他们收入有所增加。为了让更多员工受益,职总向政府建议,在垃圾管理领域推出渐进式薪金模式。 不过,国会反对党领袖、阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,也对此表达看法。他认为,尽管政府增强版的最低薪资制度,纳入职业升迁和生产力的考量,但是这种在特定领域落实的模式,实施起来还是太慢了,也过了八年时间。对于其他领域的新加坡工友显得更久。 “这些工友可以等多久?”对此,毕丹星则建议政府,落实不同行业的渐进式薪金模式同时,也实施落实以1千300元为基薪、普及化的最低薪资制,并定时检讨两者的效率。 他也重申,最低薪金制普及化,让所有国内工友受惠,不仅仅是道义上的责任,更关乎国民团结,且符合现今的经济大环境。 “这也是阐述何为新加坡人的立场,以及我们社会的真正尺度,在于我们如何对待最弱势的群体。” 毕丹星也重申,在近期《商业时报》的一篇报导, 也显示不少雇主实则愿意支持合理的全国性最低薪资制。 “我希望雇主、企业、职总和政府,对这议题的考量应超越金钱的价值,而是作为国家团结的基础。” Minimum…

缩短车程达55分钟 地铁跨岛线直穿自然保护区

自2013年宣布兴建跨岛线,经咨询公众与自然爱好组织,陆交局决定沿着自然保护区底下“直接”跨岛。 交通部宣布,有关跨岛路线的研究方案将于明年开始,可能会需要两年的时间完成研究。该项决策已权衡各项因素,包括不同利益相关者,以及对破坏环境的评估,决定采用直达的方式。 但相较其他方案,该决策直达的方式能让新加坡人减少至少六分钟的通勤时间。目前从白沙到裕廊,搭地铁和巴士需约90分钟,有了跨岛线,可缩短到约55分钟。 此外,由于路线较短,民众也可以支付较低的票价,也为纳税人的建筑成本减少约20亿元。 “就长期而言,这是一项更具环保的选择,因为其能耗更低”,陆交局表示。 在地底穿过自然保护区建造的直透路线全长约四公里,经过新加坡乡村俱乐部、中央积水自然保护区、以及泛岛高速公路。其中两公里隧道将建在麦里芝保护区底下。 然而针对自然保护区的建设,新加坡基础设施统筹部长兼交通部长许文远表示,调整路线时曾一度陷入胶着状况,因为自然保护区是新加坡较特殊的部分,他感谢自然团体的建议和理解,并承诺在项目研究与建设时,持续与他们合作。 据悉,其绕道路线沿着自然保护区边缘建造,全长九公里,深45米,其中更需避开主要设施如环线隧道、汤申东海岸线地下隧道、深隧道阴沟系统及高压电缆隧道等。 其隧道最深达70米左右,犹如25层楼组屋,并全程以花岗岩石层挖掘,减少施工造成的震动,以及避免土壤移动。 许文远表示,跨岛线对于需要经常通勤至跨岛的民众而言是非常重要的,大大提升了他们的生活质量。 “跨岛线也会对其他地铁枢纽线如裕廊湖区,以及盛港、榜鹅与后港的按单建屋新地区都有着重大影响,至少能够满足一百万人次通勤需求。” 据了解,在咨询期间,若干自然组织针对建设所带来的影响提出异议,并表示若未能采取缓解措施,其动植物的生态环境将会遭受破坏。…

本社总编许渊臣已提交答辩书

本社总编许渊臣日前因拒绝遵从指示撤下文章而遭总理李显龙以诽谤罪起诉,上周五(27日)已提交答辩书。 日前本社上载一篇《总理夫人何晶奇怪地分享了一篇与家人断绝关系的文章》,于9月1日被总理办公室要求无条件道歉与撤下文章遭婉拒。而本月5日收到代表总理李显龙的达文星律师楼( Davinder Singh Chambers LLC)寄来的原告诉状和法庭传票。 根据诉状针对文章内容提出异议,指内容含有不实与毫无根据的指控,有诋毁和指责总理之意。 而许渊臣最初的回应坚称,内容是复述李总理弟妹的话,并不具诽谤性质。 他表示,“我认为文章内容并不具备诽谤性质”,他还特别声明,“内容是根据可能对事件知情的总理家人此前发表的公开声明,也有鉴于涉及公共利益问题” 然而,他也对于文章可能产生的任何误解而致歉,针对不再将李总理列为遗嘱受托人一事,让人对总理被移除遗嘱执行人的时间点上,可能产生误解,惟这并非他的本意,他针对此事致歉。 而两人之间的诉讼,许渊臣将出庭自辩,他表示,“总理已通过新闻秘书向媒体表示,他愿意与弟妹出庭作证,因此也期待于法庭与总理见面。” 案件将于下月15日早上9点半举行审前会议。