In July 2017, the Ministry of Home Affair (MHA) put out a tender for a shipbuilding project for the Police Coast Guard (PCG).

The tender called for a firm order of the construction of 12 patrol boats with the option to supply and deliver a further five boats. It also called for maintenance of the boats for a firm period of 15 years with the options to extend for another three years.

MHA decided to award the tender to a company called ST Marine, the marine arm of defence and engineering group Singapore Technologies Engineering (STE). Temasek Holdings is the controlling shareholder of STE.

The GeBiz document that TOC obtained showed that ST Marine was competing against at least five other shipbuilders – Damen Shipyards, Lung Teh Shipbuilding, Naval Group Far East, Odyssey Marine, and Strategic Marine. GeBiz is the government’s e-procurement portal where suppliers bid on tenders posted by the government.

According to Business Times, this tender is ST Marine’s most significant shipbuilding contract win in months. Back in December 2016, ST Marine won a contract via joint bid with Penguin International to supply three reserve vessels, two small aluminium boats and one heavy marine fire vessel for the Civil Defence Force. Penguin International undertook the construction of the aluminium boats while ST Marine handled the steel vessels.

For this project with the Police Coast Guard, TOC understands that Penguin International had intended to participate in the tender process but they were dropped due to late submission.

BT’s source noted that this new contract with the PCG will see ST Marine build aluminium boats for the first time in years.

The tender process for this new contract begun in July 2017 and closed in November that same year. The bidders were only notified that the contract had already been awarded when the automatic system notification from GeBiz emailed them about the closure of the tender bid.

Now, according to the Government Procurement Regulation 2014, a contracting authority – in this case, MHA – has to publish a notice to announce that the contract has been awarded no later than 72 days after the award was given.

But in this case, MHA took much longer than the required 72 day period to notify the other bidders that the contract had already been awarded. In fact, the other suppliers were only notified more than 120 later. So why did it take so long for MHA to make the announcement given that the contract was awarded in July last year?

Not only that, there is also the curious case of the contract being awarded to ST Marine in the first place.

The project was estimated to be S$203.7 million according to MHA’s 2018 budget. However, ST Marine’s was awarded the contract with their bid of S$312.7 million – about 55% more than the estimated. In fact, BT had said in their article that the amount awarded to ST was ‘up to S$400 mil’. According to industry experts whom TOC spoke with, this is likely due to MHA taking up the option to purchase additional boats and extension of maintenance period.

Still, this begs the question of why MHA chose to award the contract to the Temasek-held company which has no recent experience in supplying aluminium boats and at an amount significantly higher than the original tender?

Damen Shipyards, Lung Teh Shipbuilding and Naval Group Far East are all established international shipbuilding companies with strong experience backing them up. Strategic Marine, a local shipyard, is also a well-established aluminium boat yard that has built a significant number of boats for PCGs before. Why were they passed over for ST Marine?

TOC has written to MHA for their comment on the tender award and to seek clarification on the progress of the project. As according to the project timeline, ST Marine should be well underway with construction. It’s possible that the significantly higher cost quoted by ST Marine is based on their ability to fulfill the order faster than the other suppliers said they could. But if that is not the case, then the basis for this tender award to ST Marine seems dubitable.

We have also reached out to the Auditor General’s Office and the Defence Science and Technology Agency which oversees GeBiz for their comments regarding the lapse of the 72-day time limit for the notice of award of contract.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Mixed reactions from public over increase of monthly NS allowance for all NSFs and NSmen

While speaking in Parliament on Monday (2 March), Senior Minister of State…

Sheng Siong CEO Lim Hock Chee’s philosophy of care proves successful and sustainable

When you think about success stories in Singapore, you cannot miss the…

街访被质问水电费调涨? 英兰妮部长亲自驳斥“传言”

一则网络贴文声称总理公署部长英兰妮,在街坊中峇鲁巴刹时,被一名老者斥责,最后灰头土脸离开。此事真伪引起网民热议,甚至英兰妮本身也出面驳斥,有关贴文扭曲事实。 该帖文称,英兰妮拜访该巴刹群众,靠近一堆老夫妇时,主动伸出手作自我介绍,说她是部长暨国会议员。但是老者没有站起来,告诉她:“你是谁我不在乎,我吃饭的时候不想被打扰。” 英兰妮再问老先生,是本地人还是马来西亚人,这时老者回答:“我是土生土长新加坡人,而且我对于今天开始第二次调涨水费至15巴仙和电费6.9巴仙,非常有意见。” 帖文称,在附近观众的围观下,英兰妮没有和老人继续对话,灰溜溜地走了。 英拉妮:未和老者深谈 不过,丹绒巴戈集选区国会议员的英兰妮,则在其个人脸书驳斥,该传言扭曲了他与老者之间的对话,因为老者说不愿被打扰后,她就转而拜访其他民众,根本没有时间再继续进行对话。 英兰妮在其脸书如是阐述: 我到中峇鲁巴刹进行长约探访,借此聆听基层民声,也方便有需要的民众可在现场直接与我沟通。 聚集在此的多是附近邻里,也有来自其他地方的访客。我一般都会询问他们来自哪里,略微了解下他们的身份背景。 当然,在探访过程选民给我的反应不一,有些感到惊讶,有者很热情欢迎,或要求一起合照。有些选民愿意与我分享早餐,非常亲和。 也有少部分民众不愿倍打扰。当时我接触一对老夫妇,也自我介绍我是议员,老太太很友善,只是他的丈夫不想被打扰,我也尊重他们并离开。 奇怪的是,不久后网络流传一则文章,为我和老先生的对话加油添醋。事实上当老先生说不愿被打扰,就没机会在有进一步对话了。…

前女佣被指偷窃终得平反 法官质疑廖文良一家指控存“不当意图”

46岁的印尼籍女佣巴蒂·莉雅妮(Parti Liyani),为樟宜机场集团主席廖文良工作近九年,不幸在2016年10月28日被裁退。 巴蒂被裁后,当天就返回印尼。不料雇主廖文良父子却在两日后报警,指控巴蒂偷走5万元财物,包括价值2.5万元名表、Prada的名牌包和Gucci墨镜等。 这也导致巴蒂在2016年12月返回新加坡时,在樟宜机场被逮捕。2019年3月,巴蒂被国家法院判罪名成立,并判坐牢两年两个月,前者选择上诉。 根据2018年8月的《新明日报》报导,当时廖文良在法庭供证时,甚至指出家里东西一再不见,家里当时只有他、妻子以及女佣,如果东西不是他和妻子偷的,女佣嫌疑最大。 廖文良声称不想继续冒险,所以妻子才辞退了巴蒂。廖自称除非出问题,否则自己不轻易开除员工,也指秘书和司机都已和他共事多年。 然而,今年9月4日,高庭推翻了国家法院的判决,改判巴蒂无罪。高庭法官陈成安甚至表示,有理由相信廖文良为了阻止女佣到人力部投诉,所以廖家父子先发制人,突然解雇女佣,不让后者有时间去人力部,并指控后者偷窃。 廖启龙自称有“穿女装习惯”? 至于廖文良儿子廖启龙,还被法官点名“不诚实的控方证人”,例如,廖启龙称失窃的女性衣物属于他的,而不是女佣的,甚至自称有穿女性衣物的习惯,说辞令人难以相信。 根据《联合早报》报导,所谓“赃物”移交警局过程也存在疑点,特别是廖家声称开箱检查女佣留下的三大箱子,并报警后,警方未立即取走证物。五周后女佣被捕,警方才上门再拍摄证物照片,廖家人才把失窃物品放回箱里。法官认为整个过程都出现混肴,甚至无法凭这些证物定罪巴蒂。 随着巴蒂上诉得直,使得包括总检察署、人力部和警方等各造,才表示将研讨是否采取进一步行动。 巴蒂申诉被非法调他处工作…