Source: Singapore Police Force.

10 liquor outlets, out of 18 outlets, in Little India were caught selling alcohol during restricted hours in Little India during the enforcement operation which took place between 5 and 27 January.

The police said on Monday (28 January) that three of those outlets were repeat offenders, and some had allowed customers to consume alcohol within their premises during restricted hours.

Investigations into the errant outlets are ongoing.

According to the police, advisory stickers were also issued to liquor outlets in Little India to remind owners and members of the public that the sale of liquor is prohibited during restricted hours and that actions will be taken against the operators for flouting the rules and regulations under the Liquor Control Act,” police added.

The Liquor Control (Supply and Consumption) Act, which came into force in 2015, is a statute of the Parliament of Singapore that regulates the supply and consumption of liquor at public places, and to make consequential and related amendments to certain other written laws. The law is designed specifically to deter recurrences of the 2013 Little India riot that took place with mobs under the influence of alcohol.

The Act prohibits the sale of liquor at retail outlets and consumption of liquor in public places between 10.30 pm and 7 am daily and there are also stricter rules for Geylang and Little India, which are designated Liquor Control Zones, where retailers cannot sell alcohol from 7 pm on Saturday to 7 am on Monday.

Delivery of liquor must also be made in accordance with the trading hours specified in the liquor licence. Offences committed within the liquor control zones (LCZs) will result in a penalty of one and a half times that in non-designated areas.

Violators that are caught drinking may be fined up to S$1,000, while repeat offenders may be fined up to S$2,000 including three months of imprisonment. Retailers that sell alcohol during the curfew hours may be fined up to S$10,000.

Some netizens went to mainstream media comment section, criticising the law that was put in place after the Little India Riot.

Peter See wrote, “One riot in singapore whole Singapore cannot drink after 10.30 pm. Another Police scholars decision?”

Ronnie Ronnie wrote, “One incident, handled badly by the authorities, followed by usual overreaction, banning of alcohol with little regard for small businesses.
Coupled with rising business cost, how are these shops to survive without flouting the rules?
The authorities should look into helping them find a solution instead of just fining them.”

Ken Han wrote, “Personally not a fan of this knee-jerk reaction from the government in 2013. After nearly 6yrs, I curious if there is enough data to show reduction of alcohol fuelled crimes to justify the disruption to the small businesses and the reduction in the quality of Singaporean lives. The data needs to be properly analysed to demonstrate that this restriction has not simply shifted alcohol fuelled crimes to earlier in the night. Or even worse, the time restriction has modified comsumer behaviours, resulting in higher rate of alcohol fuelled crimes.”

 

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

ISA – the irrelevant law?

~by: Ravi Philemon~ “Generally the power to extend detention will shift from…

南海捕非法渔民 印尼军舰与越南海警船相撞

本月26日,印尼军方在南海抓捕非法捕鱼的越南渔民时,遭两艘越南海警船拦截,其中一艘越方海警船撞向印尼护卫舰。 据法新社29日报导,本周一印尼方面已专门就此召见越南驻印尼大使。印尼外交部之厄泽越南海警的做法,威胁双方公务人员生命安全,不符国际法,有违东盟精神。 印尼方面声称,本次事件发生在印尼专属经济区海域。碰撞发生前,印尼护卫舰拦截了一搜越南渔船,该渔船涉非法捕鱼,随后该舰遭到越南海岸警卫队船只的撞击。 冲突造成涉事渔船沉没,印尼方面则扣留12名渔民,据称目前被关押在一个海军基地,“等待进一步法律程序”。 另有两名渔民跳水逃跑,被越南海警船救走。值得注意的是,双方发生碰撞的视频在社交媒体上传开。视频显示,越南海警船主动撞上印尼海军护卫舰。随后,印尼海军士兵持枪与越南海员进行对峙,并使用木棍等工具击打越南海警船。印尼海军军人怒飙脏话。 美联社则援引印尼海军第一舰队司令部司令马戈诺的声明称,事发地为印尼“北纳土纳海”水域,(2017年后,印尼为声索主权,给南海最南端海域更改的名称)。他同时说,越南也对该水域声讨主权。 据法新社报道,2014年以来,印尼一度采用清空非法捕鱼船再将其炸沉的办法遏制非法捕鱼。不过近几个月则上述措施遭暂停。 不过印尼渔业部长29日宣布,该国本周末就将恢复这种做法,具体计划为在5月4日炸沉51搜被捕获的非法捕鱼船,其中大多数为越南籍渔船。 以下为源自法新社的剪接视频:

黄循财:需在居民立场取得平衡 黄国光称不放弃争取组屋合法养猫

义顺集选区议员黄国光昨日(7日)表示,不会放弃争取组屋内合法养猫。 国家发展部长黄循财在本月6日透过书面答复议员提问,指政府必须在养宠物的居民与拒养宠物的居民之间取得平衡,不负责任放养宠物可能有碍社区整洁,严重可能造成邻里不睦。 他指可能“有碍整洁”的情况,包括宠物脱毛、宠物在公共场所随意大小便、以及喂养流浪猫等。 黄循财也指出,尽管这些不负责任行为很有可能会出现,但也不排除组屋内仍有爱猫、且愿意为居民居住环境着想的居民。因此建屋局将会与国家公园管理局,以及兽医服务持续检讨和改善宠物所有权政策。 随后,黄国光于脸书上发文表示,尽管此次争取不成功,但仍未能阻止他持续推行组屋内养猫的想法。 “看起来,对于建屋局而言,组屋内养猫仍然不行,但我会持续坚持下去,为组屋养猫持续发声。” 义顺集选区议员黄国光多年来关注动物相关议题,也是动保团体Animal Concerns Research and Education Society(简称ACRES)的创始人兼首席执行官。…

Auditor General slams civil servants for being sloppy with public funds

Approving authorities failed to be more rigorous in their scrutiny, says AG Lim Soo Ping.