In the latest development of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong versus Leong Sze Hian law suit, PM Lee had filed his Defence to Mr Leong’s counterclaim for abuse of process of the Court and chose not to reply to the Defence put forth by Mr Leong. Instead, he filed another application to strike out the counterclaim.

Mr Leong, financial consultant and veteran blogger, announced this development today on his Facebook page. He said the he “will also be applying to strike out the Prime Minister’s claim on the basis that it is an abuse of process”.

PM Lee had earlier sued Leong for defamation over a Facebook share he made with an article from TheCoverage.My. The article claimed that editor-in-chief of investigative journalism platform Sarawak Report Ms Clare Rewcastle said Singapore as “one of the key investigation targets, alongside Switzerland and United States” in the 1MDB scandal during an interview with Malaysian media.

Mr Leong retaliated this by filing a countersuit against PM Lee for the abuse of the process of the Court last month.

In his Defence and Counterclaim, Mr Leong pleads that he only had the post up for 3 days and removed it immediately upon receipt of an order from the IMDA. He challenges the Prime Minister’s case on meaning, on the extent of publication and re-publication and on malice. He does not assert that what the article said or is alleged to have said was true.

In the statement released by Carson Laws Chambers, it is stated that PM Lee chose not to challenge Mr Leong’s counterclaim as it “is not real and substantial tort” and “been brought for an improper purpose”.

Since PM Lee refused to reply to the counterclaim as there’s no grounds to it, Mr Leong “intends to request the Court of Appeal to look again at its decision” and “to hold that the abuse of process tort”.

 

Lim Tean, who is representing Mr Leong, shared this same news on his Facebook page and went on to condemn the state media saying that it is shocking that they are not reporting on this case as they once went around calling Mr Leong “fugitive evading justice” when PM Lee first filed a defamation suit again Mr Leong.

“The State Media would have known of the latest development yesterday afternoon when Lee Hsien Loong’s Defence and Application were filed. When Leong Sze Hian filed his Defence and Counterclaim on 26 December, the news of it was conveniently tucked away in B9 of the Home Section of the Straits Times the next day,” he noted.

He went on further to say that he considers this non-reporting of relevant news a subset of Fake News.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】指武吉巴督工地缺乏防范措施 徐顺全:穆仁理在哪里?

新加坡民主党秘书长徐顺全博士日前指出,武吉巴督湿巴刹附近的建筑工地,未做任何防范措施,今天他重游旧地时,发现当地已设置路障和围栏,防止民众接近。 徐顺全今天(6月27日)在脸书发帖,分享有关事件,并对当局所采取的行动感到满意。 帖文中,他指出四天前发现该区154栋的建筑工地,并没有设置防止人们进入的路障,而该处又处于武吉巴督最拥挤地区内,附近还有湿巴刹和小贩中心,因此感到担忧。 据帖文中附上的照片中,可见该建筑工地周围有防水布料遮盖,但是布料已经破破烂烂,且无法阻止民众踏入工地,地上也铺满了石头。另一张图片中,只见有关的工地已经被红白网围起来,并设置了黄色路障,破烂的蓝色布料也已经被堆放在一旁,显得非常干净整齐。 “我四天前在武吉巴督拍下这张照片,可见现场一片凌乱;所幸今早回到现场,至少设置了安全警戒线。” 强调国会议员是全职工作 他指出,该工地并非一个隐蔽角落,是当地人潮最拥挤的地点之一,而出现有关情况,也不见武吉巴督议员穆仁理(Murali Pillai)出现或提及。因此,他认为单选区需要拥有自己的全职议员,否则的话,拥有其他工作在身的议员,无法全心全意为支持他的选民服务。 “这就是我说的,议员是全职工作。若你是兼职议员,你将所有时间花在个人日常工作上,无法做到100巴仙付出。” “人们透过选举让你来经营这个地区,你每月收到1万6000元薪金,工作却外包给代管人,然后由人民付费。请问这是什么逻辑。” 他补充道,身为国会议员,为选民服务是他的职责,是全职。 “随着赋予你的责任,你需要运营市议会、照顾选区,尤其关注居民的福祉和安全,在国会中代表他们发言,建立强大的社区并保护弱势群体,这是一份全职。这也是若成为武吉巴督国会议员后,需要执行的工作。”…

SPP’s Jose Raymond calls for support for his campaign website, introduces online shop selling merchandise

Singapore People’s Party (SPP) candidate for Potong Pasir SMC Jose Raymond took…

敦马贺马国新闻自由指数跃升22位

马国首相敦马哈迪在5月3日于instagram,祝贺马来西亚媒体在2019年新闻自由指数得到不俗进展。 而马来西亚在2019年新闻自由指数跃升22位,在亚洲排名中获得123名,从去年的36.74分降了10.67分,被评比为「部分自由」。 据无国界记者组织指出,马来西亚经历去年大选,前首相纳吉领导的国阵政权倒台后,其新闻自由指数有明显提升,而新闻自由指数也犹如耳目一新般,往更自由的方向前进。 新闻自由指数是每年由无国界記者组织在评估180个国家、地区或组织上一年的新闻自由狀況的记录之后推出的排名。 该排名反映了国家的记者、新闻组织群和网民分別在多大的程度上享有新闻自由,同時也反映了该国家的政府部門分別在多大的程度保护和促进新闻自由。分数越低者代表新闻自由度越多。 更包容多元媒体,提供全面与公平观点 马来西亚政府自1948年来便立法管制新闻自由,例如:1948年煽动法令、1972年官方機密法令以及1998年通讯与多媒体法令。 “政府基于以上法令,对出刊者和新闻记者进行严格管控。他们仍然可以利用该法令来不断威胁媒体人,限制他们的言论,并予以20年以上有期徒刑。” 无国界记者组织指出 然而,无国界记者组织也表示,马国政府废除前任政府所制定的防假新闻法。此举也证明了马来西亚的新闻自由在短时间内有了明显进步。 “在马来西亚被列入黑名单的记者与媒体如馬來西亞網絡政治漫畫家祖纳与独立网路媒体《砂拉越報告》已经恢复正常工作,无需惧怕政府的骚扰。” 马国整体能够更包容多元新闻媒体,如支持现任及前任政府的媒体,提供他们更轻松及低自我审视的环境,让他们提供更全面与公平的观点。…