The purpose of a Meet the People session is for the people of a Group Representation Constituency (GRC) to have a chance to raise their personal issues – or any issue, really – to their MP. It’s supposed to make the MP more accessible to the people, create a direct line between citizens and their government.

But that didn’t quite work out for one citizen, Mr Edward Foo, a volunteer from the online Ready4Repeal movement. Just to remind you, the Ready4Repeal movement is a petition to repeal Section 377A of the Penal Code that criminalises homosexuality, specifically it criminalises sex between two mutually consenting adult men.

Mr Edward has turned up for the Meet the People Session at Yishun as he wanted to personally hand over the petition – containing 859 names of people within that specific GRC – to his MP, Er Dr Lee Bee Wah.

Mr Foo recounted that he had arrived at the session with a few friends and they had told the registrant that they were there to discuss a personal matter with the MP. The registrant has also asked to see his IC, place of residence, and confirmed that he was indeed a Singaporean.

Once inside, he was met with a letter writer – letter writers volunteers who were there to help people write letters to the relevant ministries about their issues. When asked what they were there to discuss, Mr Foo again said it was a personal matter and he wanted to speak to the MP directly.

The follow description of the encounter give off all kinds of hostile vibes:

The MP walks over, shakes our hands one by one, and immediately asks if we are related. The other resident of the GRC replies that we are not, but we have come together as we were there to discuss the same topic. The MP then immediately asked them to leave as she only wanted to talk to her residents. At this point the other resident of the GRC replies, telling the MP that she does live here, and is a resident of the GRC. The MP then asks her to leave as well, and take a seperate queue number. The MP then stated that “she thinks she knows what this is about”, as her other MPs have “mentioned this before”. She waited for all three of my friends to leave, and I was left alone. She then asked me to “say what I wanted to say”. I then said: “This is regarding section 377a, and I was wondering what your views on this matter are.” The MP then said: “I have other residents with real problems”, and exited the room.

Mr Foo was left there on his own now waiting for the letter writer to return, and she did after fifteen minutes. The letter writer had apparently ‘actively avoided’ Mr Foo the entire time, speaking to other residents around him instead. Eventually as the MP was walking away, Mr Foo has called out to her and said, “If you don’t want to talk to me, can I at least pass you this” while holding out the Ready4Repeal petition addressed to her. Instead of accepting it, she simply gestured her hand away and asked him to pass it to one of the volunteers instead.

The letter writer accepted the petition and assured Mr Foo that it would be delivered to the MP.

At first read and I’d argue at every subsequent read as well, the MP’s attitude towards Mr Foo and his companions were cold, dismissive and bordering on hostile. Mr Foo and his friends were there as members of that GRC to speak to their representative in Parliament to hand her a petition over an issue that they hold close to their heart. They weren’t aggressive or hostile. They simply wanted to hand deliver their petition to their MP directly but they were essentially shooed away.

That is not how any parliamentarian should behave toward their own constituency. Even if Dr Lee disagrees with the petition and what it calls for, she still should have been respectful of her own residents and be open to at least accepting the petition.

She didn’t even bother giving them time to lay out their case nor did she give them the courtesy of accepting the petition herself. There really is no other word for it than rude.

Wading through the rampant homophobic comments in the comments section of Mr Foo’s post, you will find many who are equally appalled at the MP’s dismissive attitude:

But some netizens reflected that perhaps the GRC wasn’t the best avenue to bring up such an issue since the GRC was reserved for issues of a more ‘personal’ and ‘individual’ nature:

While others disagreed:

Whether or not you agree with the petition, I think we can all agree that the MP’s attitude was inexcusable:

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

WhatsApp now permits user to decide who can add them in group chats

On Wednesday (3 April), Facebook introduced a new feature on its WhatsApp…

Singapore falls heavily on COVID-19 pandemic due to three flaws, says M’sia Sinchew Daily’s Tay Tian Yan

There are three flaws in the measures taken by Singapore government when…

淡马锡旗下子公司 出资救太平船务

据国际海事媒体报导,淡马锡全资子公司海丽凯资本(Heliconia Capital Management)据称有意对深陷财务困境的太平船务(PIL),注资至少4亿美元(约5.65亿新元)。 知情人士指出,海丽凯资本可能通过收购股权和债务向处于困境中的太平船务注资。不过目前仅在初步阶段,相信未来几周才会商定细节。 知情人士分析,海丽凯资本迫切入股太平船务,有可能是为了保障新加坡在冠病疫情下的食品供应物流。 据《华尔街邮报》早前曾指,太平船务最大债权人,包括星展集团和盘谷银行,曝险分别约为2.6亿美元和2.2亿美元。两年前,太平船务也通过淡马锡旗下的狮诚控股(SeaTown Holdings)获得贷款。同时,还有一笔6千万元在今年11月到期的债券。 据称,太平船务正与15家债权人就债务问题进行磋商,并已和绝大多数债权人达成一致,将本金和利息的支付时间,推迟至年底。同时,与尚未同意解决债务问题的债权人,进行进一步沟通。 今年3月,太平船务完成最后一次跨太平航线运营后,正式退出跨太平洋航线市场,转而将业务重心放在中东/红海、印度次大陆、非洲、拉丁美洲和大洋洲等南北贸易航线上。 由前官委议员领导 太平船务由张松声领导,后者在2009年至2014期间担任官委议员,2009年至2013年担任中华总商会会长。 2010年获颁公共服务奖章,2019年则获颁公共服务星章(BBM)。…

人力部动用“泼马”发出更正指示 民主党驳资料参考《海峡时报》

政府第三度援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),这次是向新加坡民主党发出指示,要求更正两则脸书贴文和一则文章。不过尽管民主党已遵循指示,惟仍表示会上诉,以移除有关更正指示。 相关脸书贴文分别发布于11月30日以及12月2日,贴文分享该党官网誌期6月8日的文章,其中的图表提及本地PMET(专业人士、经理、执行人员以及技师)的失业率上升,以及外籍PMET逐步增长。 对此,人力部昨日(14日)透过《防假消息法》办事处,向该党发出要求更正指示,指内容含有不实信息。 在人力部发出的文告,则反驳本地PMET的就业率自2015年实则逐步增长;且并没有出现本地PMET裁员增加的趋势。 该部澄清,2018年本地PMET的裁员率,是自2014年以来的新低。该部也驳斥民主党试图误导国人,激发本地PMET的恐惧。“尽管经济遇到阻力,但本地PMET人数一直都增长,不论是PMET还是其他职业,裁员都未有增加趋势。” 据了解,民主党有遵循指示,在相关贴文附上更正指示,附上政府的更正事实链接: 官方管控报纸   “理应不会发假新闻” 不过,该党副主席陈两裕,则在今日发布声明,指民主党上述发表于今年6月8日的文章,也是参考自《海峡时报》3月15日的报导。 报导提及在去年(2018)被裁员新加坡人和永久居民中,PMET占了四分之三,即76巴仙,是十年来最高,比起2017年的72巴仙有所增长,远远高于PMET在常驻劳动力中的比例(57巴仙)。 民主党在声明中反驳,该党相信作为官方管控的报纸,《海峡时报》没有理由会制造有关政府的假新闻。故此,民主党也呼吁人力部理应针对此事向《海峡时报》追究。 另一方面,…